• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Will the Libya scandal lose the election for Obama?

Will the Libya scandal lose the election for Obama?


  • Total voters
    71
Doesn't matter. Voices in the wilderness. Absent evidence, it will not advance.

Must be some sort of evidence to have the Demo Chair of the Senate Arms and Intelligence Committees to Call for hearings. Do you think it had to do with the mixed messages that Team Obama had put out?

Also lets not forget Issa and the house, who now have even more of reason to go after the issue full tilt. So who will Obama throw under the bus first. That is the real question. Think the Re-tread can use EP this time round?
 
Must be some sort of evidence to have the Demo Chair of the Senate Arms and Intelligence Committees to Call for hearings. Do you think it had to do with the mixed messages that Team Obama had put out?

Also lets not forget Issa and the house, who now have even more of reason to go after the issue full tilt. So who will Obama throw under the bus first. That is the real question. This the Re-tread can use EP this time round?

Sorry, any speculation is not equal to evidence. Again, absent evidence, IT WILL NOT ADVANCE.
 
Sorry, any speculation is not equal to evidence. Again, absent evidence, IT WILL NOT ADVANCE.

Again, the problem is.....the issue has already Advanced. From the House to now with the Senate. As well as more Newpapers and Radio Stations picking up on it. As well as more Republicans climbing on board to go after the issue. Looks like it will be set forth and made to Advance despite the lefts efforts to duck and dodge.

Do you think the Autopsy on Stevens Body should given to the public? Or do you think they need more than the 45 days they have already used up in delaying on that report?
 
Again, the problem is.....the issue has already Advanced. From the House to now with the Senate. As well as more Newpapers and Radio Stations picking up on it. As well as more Republicans climbing on board to go after the issue. Looks like it will be set forth and made to Advance despite the lefts efforts to duck and dodge.

Do you think the Autopsy on Stevens Body should given to the public? Or do you think they need more than the 45 days they have already used up in delaying on that report?

We'll see, but you've already been wrong. Doubling down won't make you right. YOu need actual evidence.
 
of course ,no..........obama will win.
 
We'll see, but you've already been wrong. Doubling down won't make you right. YOu need actual evidence.


How was I wrong.....considering it has progressed and the issue wasn't able to be dropped like the MSM and the left wants. Seems I have been calling it down as to all the way where it was and from the beginning wherein the left was playing games over the mixed messages by Team Obama, and said it was going to be dropped back then. U know after the 23 Muslim Countries rioted our Embassies, Military Posts, overseas corporations/buisnesses and Schools.

We will definitely see.....that is a given! As Fienstein said those hearings would take place Starting with the next session and I doubt the MSM will be able to avoid the coverage. Seems Fienstein validates just how wrong I am.....huh? :roll:
 
How was I wrong.....considering it has progressed and the issue wasn't able to be dropped like the MSM and the left wants. Seems I have been calling it down as to all the way where it was and from the beginning wherein the left was playing games over the mixed messages by Team Obama, and said it was going to be dropped back then. U know after the 23 Muslim Countries rioted our Embassies, Military Posts, overseas corporations/buisnesses and Schools.

We will definitely see.....that is a given! As Fienstein said those hearings would take place Starting with the next session and I doubt the MSM will be able to avoid the coverage. Seems Fienstein validates just how wrong I am.....huh? :roll:

No, it really hasn't progressed. You may be very disappointed.
 
No, it really hasn't progressed. You may be very disappointed.

Really hasn't? But then has since it was only being questioned at first in the House. If it would have ended it's progression then it would not be going to the Senate. Moreover no other reports would be coming out and the matter would be over with.
 
Really hasn't? But then has since it was only being questioned at first in the House. If it would have ended it's progression then it would not be going to the Senate. Moreover no other reports would be coming out and the matter would be over with.

Questioning what happened is not going after a cover up. You're jumping beyond what has really happened. The house likely acted fro political reasons. But anything on what happened, cover up or anything else, depends on evidence and not you're wanting it to be true.
 
The scandal is the coverup in progress. We the people are concerned about three areas of this incident:

1) Before the attack, why was security reduced in spite of the increasing violence and concern by those on the ground?
2) During the attack, who was watching/aware, what requests were made, what response was made, and who made the decisions?
3) After the attack, why did the administration sock puppets (like Rice and Carney) insist on the YouTube fairy tale for so long, and at whose orders?

The scandal can go away when we have our answers.
 
The scandal is the coverup in progress. We the people are concerned about three areas of this incident:

1) Before the attack, why was security reduced in spite of the increasing violence and concern by those on the ground?
2) During the attack, who was watching/aware, what requests were made, what response was made, and who made the decisions?
3) After the attack, why did the administration sock puppets (like Rice and Carney) insist on the YouTube fairy tale for so long, and at whose orders?

The scandal can go away when we have our answers.

Most of you have done a lot of mind reading and wild speculation on those those things. In most cases we have answer, and they seem plausible. At some point you have to quit wildly throwing stuff up and produce evidence. In today's world, secrets are nearly impossible to keep. Don't you remember the Bush presidency? Secrets are uncovered rather quickly today.
 
Most of you have done a lot of mind reading and wild speculation on those those things. In most cases we have answer, and they seem plausible. At some point you have to quit wildly throwing stuff up and produce evidence. In today's world, secrets are nearly impossible to keep. Don't you remember the Bush presidency? Secrets are uncovered rather quickly today.

Yeah I think those cellphones, vidos and cam corders the Libyans confiscated and gave to the FBI in Tripoli with the pictures on them count as evidence. Also the Libyan Security Commander of the Battalion and the TNC of Libya has confirmed they told US Diplomats 3 days prior to the attack it was to dangerous to go in. Moreover we now have video footage of the road blocks that were set up by the local militia and authority in the Region. Moreover they even have documents copied that were sent to the Libyans both local and government Forces.

Plus we have Rice, Clinton and Obama faces all on footage blaming the attack on a film. So far the evidence just keeps mounting against them. Lets not forget those WH leaks either. As well as Panetta now stating General Ham and Him decided not to take any other action.
 
Yeah I think those cellphones, vidos and cam corders the Libyans confiscated and gave to the FBI in Tripoli with the pictures on them count as evidence. Also the Libyan Security Commander of the Battalion and the TNC of Libya has confirmed they told US Diplomats 3 days prior to the attack it was to dangerous to go in. Moreover we now have video footage of the road blocks that were set up by the local militia and authority in the Region. Moreover they even have documents copied that were sent to the Libyans both local and government Forces.

Plus we have Rice, Clinton and Obama faces all on footage blaming the attack on a film. So far the evidence just keeps mounting against them. Lets not forget those WH leaks either. As well as Panetta now stating General Ham and Him decided not to take any other action.

They have to show what you claim they show. Nothing you present so far backs what you claim. Remove your prejudgement and you'll see what I mean.
 
They have to show what you claim they show. Nothing you present so far backs what you claim. Remove your prejudgement and you'll see what I mean.

The only thing it backs is the new sources that have identified such. Which has also helped to progress the matter. Well that and alluding to the fact that Team Obama dropped the ball. ;)
 
The only thing it backs is the new sources that have identified such. Which has also helped to progress the matter. Well that and alluding to the fact that Team Obama dropped the ball. ;)

Doesn't mean it will progress the way you want. Again, you may be very disappointed.
 
Will the Libya scandal lose the election for Obama?


I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say, "Nope!" :lol:
 
:lamo.....:doh Looks like the light bulbs are finally being turned on!
 
Will the Libya scandal lose the election for Obama?


I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say, "Nope!" :lol:


Maybe the question should be "Will Republican/conservatives try and keep the Libya tragedy alive and twisted?"
 
Maybe the question should be "Will Republican/conservatives try and keep the Libya tragedy alive and twisted?"

Perhaps you should ask the Democratic Chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee who called for hearings. Diane Fienstein is the Name.....do you think she is keeping it alive and twisted for snits and giggles? :roll:
 
Perhaps you should ask the Democratic Chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee who called for hearings. Diane Fienstein is the Name.....do you think she is keeping it alive and twisted for snits and giggles? :roll:

There is nothing wrong in asking for a hearing. A full investigation is necessary and appropriate. To try and make accusations before the truth comes out is not. The right already had all the answers before any of the facts started coming out. Tsk, tsk.
 
The right already had all the answers before any of the facts started coming out. Tsk, tsk.

Not true. The right had facts that contradicted the administration's fairy tale, and we still don't have answers.
 
There is nothing wrong in asking for a hearing. A full investigation is necessary and appropriate. To try and make accusations before the truth comes out is not. The right already had all the answers before any of the facts started coming out. Tsk, tsk.

No of course not.....especially after Hillary ordered an independent investigation. Then Kerry of the Senate Arms Committee stated questions had to be answered. Which then Issa and the House Started up their committees. Course it was the Demos themselves that were asking questions concerning classified info in the first hearing. Did you think it was appropriate of those Demos making accusations against the CIA, were doing so because the WH didn't want anything out until Clintons Independent investigation was done? Lets hope they weren't twisting anything over what Team Obama's people already had put out.....huh?
 
Not true. The right had facts that contradicted the administration's fairy tale, and we still don't have answers.
The right was going with the different and often contradicting details that were coming out, seemingly wanting to pin it on Obama just to make him look bad. They hoped it would hurt him in the election, but they failed.

It will be interesting to see how many of their "facts" actually turn out to be true when the real facts of this tragedy are revealed.
 
A meteor could not have stopped that guy from winning the election. As a country....we are officially nuts..
 
A meteor could not have stopped that guy from winning the election. As a country....we are officially nuts..

No. You just choose a poor candidate, and oddly the one closet to Obama himself. It's bad enough that there is no real difference between the parties; having to candidates so close to one another is what was nuts.

:coffeepap
 
Back
Top Bottom