• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Do think Sharia Law is a REAL possiblity in the US?

Do think Sharia Law is a REAL possiblity in the US?

  • Total voters
    120
Objective-J said:
thanks for liking this bodhi, i thought more people would like the humor in it but maybe it wasnt obvious enough. lol
Click to expand...

See above post, you are blatantly trying to trap people.

I like Mashed Potatoes.
 
David Watson said:
See above post, you are blatantly trying to trap people.

I like Mashed Potatoes.
Click to expand...

WRONG again, say it 15 more times, it will be just as false the first time you said it lol
 
Objective-J said:
WRONG again, say it 15 more times, it will be just as false the first time you said it lol
Click to expand...

Yeah, it's pretty obvious you are trapping people into liking mashed potatoes. I didn't fall for your evil plan. :2razz:
 
EagleAye said:
Yeah, it's pretty obvious you are trapping people into liking mashed potatoes. I didn't fall for your evil plan. :2razz:
Click to expand...

WTF!!!!!

there are people that DONT like mashed potatoes??????


those evil, anti-american, raciest, commie, Hitler praising, socialist, homophobic, misogynistic bastards!!!

What type of anti-freedom, war on woman, want to kill old people **** is that?
 
Objective-J said:
Im asking this question because of some of the people I have encountered that want extra laws made banning it and they say they would never vote for ANY Muslim politician because of it.

SO I ask, do you fear Sharia Law and think its a possibility here in the US.

I do not.
Click to expand...

If we're speaking about probabilities only, then a Christian theocracy is much more likely. But only if we're speaking in probabilities.
 
Objective-J said:
WTF!!!!!

there are people that DONT like mashed potatoes??????


those evil, anti-american, raciest, commie, Hitler praising, socialist, homophobic, misogynistic bastards!!!

What type of anti-freedom, war on woman, want to kill old people **** is that?
Click to expand...

It's gotta be garlic-mashed potatoes made with lots of sour cream and brown gravy on the top. Anything else is a clear case of Communists trying to take over and eat our babies.
 
Objective-J said:
Im asking this question because of some of the people I have encountered that want extra laws made banning it and they say they would never vote for ANY Muslim politician because of it.
Click to expand...

Those who hold this perspective most likely believe that use of a Ouija Board will have put them in contact with the "spirit" world.



SO I ask, do you fear Sharia Law and think its a possibility here in the US.

I do not.
Click to expand...
Sharia, like any religious law, is prohibited by the US Constitution. The US government is prohibited from interfering with religious activities. "Proposals to ban sharia raise a serious dilemma for legal scholars and jurists because the composition of sharia remains debated among various Islamic sects and scholars. Without an authoritative body of law with specific parameters, courts may find themselves faced with a need to determine the precise principles of sharia and thus offer judgment on the content of a religious doctrine, which is generally impermissible under the First Amendment."

"In 1872, the Court recognized that matters of religious doctrine should be determined within the authority of the particular church and should be separate from any secular legal interpretation: The law knows no heresy, and is committed to the support of no dogma, the establishment of no sect. … "

All who united themselves to such a body [the general church] do so with an implied consent to [its] government, and are bound to submit to it. But it would be a vain consent and would lead to total subversion of such religious bodies, if any one aggrieved by one of their decisions could appeal to the secular courts and have them [sic] reversed. It is of the essence of these religious unions, and of their right to establish tribunals for the decision of questions arising among themselves, that those decisions should be binding in all cases of ecclesiastical cognizance, subject only to such appeals as the organism itself provides for.​


Thus, the Court established the principle that determinations of church doctrine and practice were to be free of government control well before it had even developed other aspects of its First Amendment jurisprudence. That general principle has since been cited by the Court in a number of First Amendment cases involving challenges of government interference in internal church matters."

http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41824.pdf
 
Objective-J said:
Im asking this question because of some of the people I have encountered that want extra laws made banning it and they say they would never vote for ANY Muslim politician because of it.

SO I ask, do you fear Sharia Law and think its a possibility here in the US.

I do not.
Click to expand...

DO YOU FEAR SHARIA LAW

plain as day bro, can't hide the truth.
 
David Watson said:
DO YOU FEAR SHARIA LAW

plain as day bro, can't hide the truth.
Click to expand...

what truths have you posted?
and how do they matter to my question?

you failed on the trap issue plan and simple lol
 
Objective-J said:
what truths have you posted?
and how do they matter to my question?

you failed on the trap issue plan and simple lol
Click to expand...

You do not have to FEAR sharia law in order to believe it to be a possibility. You are instigating that anyone who thinks Sharia Law could be a possibility, is someone who fears it, and thereby implicating they fear Muslims.

That is plain and simple, Mr. Dodge and Twist.
 
David Watson said:
You do not have to FEAR sharia law in order to believe it to be a possibility. You are instigating that anyone who thinks Sharia Law could be a possibility, is someone who fears it, and thereby implicating they fear Muslims.

That is plain and simple, Mr. Dodge and Twist.
Click to expand...

instigating??? LMAO

wow you like to make stuff up dont you, no i didnt thats your biased dishonest mind made up.

Please point where i said they have to be the same?

you are dishonest and you TWISTED what is being asked unless of course you have proof, thats whats plain and simple.

Mr. Biased and Failure LMAO
 
Objective-J said:
Im asking this question because of some of the people I have encountered that want extra laws made banning it and they say they would never vote for ANY Muslim politician because of it.

SO I ask, do you fear Sharia Law and think its a possibility here in the US.

I do not.
Click to expand...

This is the THIRD TIME I am quoting your original post where you say "Do you fear sharia law and think its a possibility here in the US?" Thats not what the poll says, thats what the original post says. You even put the *AND* in Bold Face.

Who's Twisting?
 
David Watson said:
This is the THIRD TIME I am quoting your original post where you say "Do you fear sharia law and think its a possibility here in the US?" Thats not what the poll says, thats what the original post says. You even put the *AND* in Bold Face.

Who's Twisting?
Click to expand...

yes that is the QUESTION that was in the post :shrug:

its a question, it doesnt "insinuate" ANYTHING.LMAO

I asked you for proof of you LIE that you said I insinuated they have to exist together? that never happened, its a lie.

so again I ask for proof of your lie please?
 
Objective-J said:
yes that is the QUESTION that was in the post :shrug:

its a question, it doesnt "insinuate" ANYTHING.LMAO

I asked you for proof of you LIE that you said I insinuated they have to exist together? that never happened, its a lie.

so again I ask for proof of your lie please?
Click to expand...

The Poll asks whether you believe Sharia Law to be a possibility. The Original Post *ADDS* that if you think so, you fear Sharia Law. Trap.
 
David Watson said:
The Poll asks whether you believe Sharia Law to be a possibility. The Original Post *ADDS* that if you think so, you fear Sharia Law. Trap.
Click to expand...

wrong again, but nice try. Let me know when you have proof of your lie LOL
 
David Watson said:
I'd love to make a poll within a poll, but, this is your post, so have fun! :)
Click to expand...

i would love for you to do that to because that would also fail because you still have ZERO proof of your lie :shrug:
 
David Watson said:
How about Freedom of Speech? Yes, and let me attack the straw man called "Uneducated if you don't agree with me"

this is what was in the OP:
"Im asking this question because of some of the people I have encountered that want extra laws made banning it and they say they would never vote for ANY Muslim politician because of it.

SO I ask, do you fear Sharia Law and think its a possibility here in the US.

I do not."

He's not just asking if you think its a possibility, because if you do (which I believe almost everything to be POSSIBLE, plausible is another story) then you automatically agree to "fearing Sharia law". Its a trap, take off your blinders.
Click to expand...

Not, it's not. There can never be any greater freedom of religion for a Muslim than for anyone else in the US.
 
Pinkie said:
Not, it's not. There can never be any greater freedom of religion for a Muslim than for anyone else in the US.
Click to expand...

On the flip side, we cannot discriminate any more against Islam then we do for any other religion.

I'm still waiting for the Sky is Falling crowd to explain to me how it is Constitutional to allow Rabbinical in secular finance but not Sharia in secular finance. The fact that we are openly practicing Sharia in the US under limited circumstances suggests that those in charge realize what is legal and what is not.
 
obvious Child said:
On the flip side, we cannot discriminate any more against Islam then we do for any other religion.

I'm still waiting for the Sky is Falling crowd to explain to me how it is Constitutional to allow Rabbinical in secular finance but not Sharia in secular finance. The fact that we are openly practicing Sharia in the US under limited circumstances suggests that those in charge realize what is legal and what is not.
Click to expand...

Again, I did a Op some time ago, analyzing all the constitutional defects in these anti-Sharia laws. I agree with you completely, and the bigots who support these laws should hang their heads in shame.

Whose unpopular beliefs would they like us to outlaw next? I'd love to outlaw theirs -- but this is America, and they have the freedom to be wrong, to say wrong things, worship wrong ideas, vote for the wrong candidate, etc.

I'd love to see us amend the constitution so that any lawmaker who votes for a blatantly unconstitutional law has to repay his state and the federal government's costs in seeking its repeal.
 
all that is neccessary for evil to prevail is for good men to do nothing.
 
Pinkie said:
Fabulous quote -- but how did you mean it to be applied in this thread, dear?
Click to expand...

sharia law is possible if good people do nothing to prevent it. all i was trying to say. it's unlikely, but then again so are lightning strikes killing babies, doesnt mean it doesnt happen from time to time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom