• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is polling skewed?

Is polling skewed?


  • Total voters
    17

Anagram

DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 10, 2011
Messages
9,216
Reaction score
5,859
Location
St. Louis MO
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Conservative
As happens every election, there have been accusations lately that the polling for the Presidential election has been skewed toward Obama. I saw a website recently pop up claiming the real values for the latest polling, all of them showing a large Romney lead. UnSkewed Polls -- erasing the bias to show an accurate picture of politics Much of the complaints have been due to the Party affiliation numbers that polls have been putting up, most of them showing a larger Democratic affiliation than there actually is.

So what do you think? Is polling in general being purposely skewed one way to drive an agenda?
 
As happens every election, there have been accusations lately that the polling for the Presidential election has been skewed toward Obama. I saw a website recently pop up claiming the real values for the latest polling, all of them showing a large Romney lead. UnSkewed Polls -- erasing the bias to show an accurate picture of politics Much of the complaints have been due to the Party affiliation numbers that polls have been putting up, most of them showing a larger Democratic affiliation than there actually is.

So what do you think? Is polling in general being purposely skewed one way to drive an agenda?

Depends how they do the polling. Land line heavy tends to lean Republican. And how they get cell phone numbers for polling is something I'd like to know.
 
Depends how they do the polling. Land line heavy tends to lean Republican. And how they get cell phone numbers for polling is something I'd like to know.

Most cellphone pollsters use Random Digit Dialers to reach them.
 
Where did you hear that from? Furthermore, how do you ensure a proper geographical sample? Especially in this day and age where area code doesn't mean anything.

That's just what PPP and AP-GFK write about their methodology. I assume that's how most of the others do it. As for the Geographic sample, I think they ask in the questions where they live if they weight for geography.
 
That's just what PPP and AP-GFK write about their methodology. I assume that's how most of the others do it. As for the Geographic sample, I think they ask in the questions where they live if they weight for geography.

Got a link? Seems like a poor way of polling. Especially given the required time frames.
 
I say yes most polls are...
 
This poll is totally skewed.
 
Care to elaborate? Which way are they slanted and why do you think so?


Depending on who does the polling...the way questions are worded and sometimes outright not reporting the true results
 
As an engineer that has taken many data samples of various things that are hardware and/or software, I've found that it is difficult to resolve differences of 5% or so accurately. I think therefore, that expecting polls to resolve 5% differences in political polls is silly. What polls can show is trends. A few of them are good enough and unbiased enough to show trends. Most of the time trends can be related to events. I didn't vote in this poll, no point in it.
 
Depends on the poll. Loaded/fixed selections are the most obvious, then there's the selection of people who are contacted. I can't imagine it would be too damn difficult to primarily target a specific demographic who is most likely to vote the way one wants in order to get their numbers up. For all we know, there's probably a room somewhere in Virginia full of chimps trained to write random numbers on dry erase boards, and whatever they come up with is that weeks poll results.
 
Last edited:
In most cases I say no. In some cases I wonder if they are while trying the give the pollster the benefit of the doubt. Its really odd, for example when one pollster out of numerous ones consistently give one candidate higher numbers. Or when a website that gives the averages of all polls waits about a week to include one poll from a hugely significant media outlet seemingly waiting for other polls to drop a little so that their average doesn't bring up one side's numbers too much.

I also think if its happening, they're only hurting their own credibility when the election occurs and setting both themselves and the audience their trying to give false hope for disappointment.

Now that I'm thinking of it I recall there was some deliberate shenanigans going on on election day 2000 in one state. A dishonest activist pollster reported to the media that one side was doing better than expected in the exit polls in that state. Then when that candidate lost that state big time later that night, they had egg all over their faces and were very disappointed.
 
I find it best to just ignore polls as they are always inaccurate.
 
As happens every election, there have been accusations lately that the polling for the Presidential election has been skewed toward Obama. I saw a website recently pop up claiming the real values for the latest polling, all of them showing a large Romney lead. UnSkewed Polls -- erasing the bias to show an accurate picture of politics Much of the complaints have been due to the Party affiliation numbers that polls have been putting up, most of them showing a larger Democratic affiliation than there actually is.

So what do you think? Is polling in general being purposely skewed one way to drive an agenda?
Purposely? I doubt it.

We went from a historic shift in turnout and voting demographics in 2008 to a complete turnaround in 2010. The fact is, nobody knows what the demographics and turnout are going to look like this year. The various polling companies are making their best guesses in creating samples, and yes the liberal ones are probably estimating a little liberal, and conservative ones conservative. As always, the most accurate polls are probably the ones that aggregate those from several different companies.

But I don't think any of them are trying to push an agenda. A polling company that is inaccurate doesn't seem likely to last very long. I don't think polls effect momentum as much as they simply start a conversation going. But in presidential campaigns, the conversation is already going, and the stakes are high. I don't think presidential polling has much of an effect on election outcomes.
 
Last edited:
As happens every election, there have been accusations lately that the polling for the Presidential election has been skewed toward Obama. I saw a website recently pop up claiming the real values for the latest polling, all of them showing a large Romney lead. UnSkewed Polls -- erasing the bias to show an accurate picture of politics Much of the complaints have been due to the Party affiliation numbers that polls have been putting up, most of them showing a larger Democratic affiliation than there actually is.

So what do you think? Is polling in general being purposely skewed one way to drive an agenda?
Consciously or subconsciously the stats will always reflect the person or organization that is doing the poll.
 
This poll is most definitely skewed.

I think far more problematic is the electoral college and the media that reports the election over the minute the polls close. Takes the fun and legitimacy right out of the whole thing.
 
Back
Top Bottom