• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is Obama a Socialist or a Communist?

Which is he


  • Total voters
    31
I think Obama is a capitalist moderate with a slight liberalism in him. Wanting 100% equal rights for all and insurance and healthcare to not suck a little less doesn't make you a liberal or any of those other tags, it just means you're not an asshole.
 
Of course in most of the 1st world countries he'd probably be considered a conservative. It's all relative really.

Well, we aren't in most 1st world countries and in the U.S., he is most definitely a liberal...and most definitely not a conservative.
 
Sorry I can't vote... There's no option for Kenyan marxist revolutionary on here.
 
Well, we aren't in most 1st world countries and in the U.S., he is most definitely a liberal...and most definitely not a conservative.
He spent his formative years surrounded by Marxists, Communists, socialists, Progressives, and liberals. He even managed to find time to hang around with radicals and terrorists. He grew up in Indonesia, an Islamic nation. He is anti-American. He is a foreigner in many ways.

He needs to go.

We need to defeat him so he and the impeached president "Slick willie" can hang around together.
 
I do not see:

[x] Angelfood Cake
[x] Mosealong -or-
[X] Ninja

Therefore I cannot vote.
 
That is it for me. I am leaving for a while. One of the mods has taken a liking to me and I cannot shake him. Just look for all the places I have been thread banned and you will understand.

I will be back in a few weeks.
 
He spent his formative years surrounded by Marxists, Communists, socialists, Progressives, and liberals. He even managed to find time to hang around with radicals and terrorists. He grew up in Indonesia, an Islamic nation. He is anti-American. He is a foreigner in many ways.

He needs to go.

We need to defeat him so he and the impeached president "Slick willie" can hang around together.

I think you are looking for the conspiracy forum lol
 
He spent his formative years surrounded by Marxists, Communists, socialists, Progressives, and liberals. He even managed to find time to hang around with radicals and terrorists. He grew up in Indonesia, an Islamic nation. He is anti-American. He is a foreigner in many ways.

He needs to go.

We need to defeat him so he and the impeached president "Slick willie" can hang around together.

While I agree he needs to go, I don't agree with your over-the-top rhetoric on why. For me, it's enough that he wants to implement the liberal agenda and grow the government.
 
He spent his formative years surrounded by Marxists, Communists, socialists, Progressives, and liberals. He even managed to find time to hang around with radicals and terrorists. He grew up in Indonesia, an Islamic nation. He is anti-American. He is a foreigner in many ways.

He needs to go.

We need to defeat him so he and the impeached president "Slick willie" can hang around together.

Lol wut. Btw bush and the bin laden family used to be tight. What about Rumsfeld and Saddam sitting in the parlor smokin' cigars?
 
While I agree he needs to go, I don't agree with your over-the-top rhetoric on why. For me, it's enough that he wants to implement the liberal agenda and grow the government.

Your and I aren't so different. The difference is where we believe government shouldn't grow. Where we're you when the PATRIOT Act along with homeland was created? What about the unnecessary warring when all it took was a president to make an executive order that the CIA use all of its resources to find squealers and use a team of navy seals?
 
Recent evidence has surfaced that Obama is, in fact, a communist.


Marx_with_Empty_Chair.jpg
 
He spent his formative years surrounded by Marxists, Communists, socialists, Progressives, and liberals. He even managed to find time to hang around with radicals and terrorists.
Care to name some of them?

He grew up in Indonesia, an Islamic nation.

He lived there for four years. Do you consider that 'growing up' there?

He is anti-American. He is a foreigner in many ways.

Do you mind elaborating? How is he anti-American and a foreigner?
 
Your and I aren't so different. The difference is where we believe government shouldn't grow. Where we're you when the PATRIOT Act along with homeland was created? What about the unnecessary warring when all it took was a president to make an executive order that the CIA use all of its resources to find squealers and use a team of navy seals?

I don't think I said anything about WHERE the government shouldn't grow, so don't imply that I want the government to grow in certain areas and not others. The fact is...I want the government to be reduced in ALL areas. I also want certain Departments and Agencies removed altogether.

But let's talk about the issues you brought up, eh"

Patriot Act: I think it is useful and necessary.

Homeland Security: Again, useful and necessary.

The problem I have with these two issues isn't that they were created, but that they've been used to increase the size, scope and power of the government. Homeland Security, for example, was designed to consolidate all our intelligence agencies under one roof. It's gone beyond that to the point that we have TSA agents doing their thing at sporting events and even on the sidewalks of our streets.

Unnecessary warring: Not sure exactly what you are referring to here, but you seem to have a very simplistic attitude toward violent conflict in the world. Let's take killing bin Laden for example...Do you think it would have been possible to find him and kill him without the resources of established U.S. installations in the area?
 
Since so many right wingers describe Obama as a "Socialist/Communist/", or some variation thereof, I figure by now they'll have made up their minds about which one of these mutually exclusive political philosophies he is.

Remember though, as Socialist believes in sharing wealth, to many different degrees depending on which flavour they are, a Communist, on the other hand, believes in a classless, stateless society where the means of production are evenly distributed. And if he's a Marxist (as is often claimed), then he wants to attain this through violent revolution.

Neither he is a pro-market social democrat.
 
He's a left leaning populist.
 
I don't think I said anything about WHERE the government shouldn't grow, so don't imply that I want the government to grow in certain areas and not others. The fact is...I want the government to be reduced in ALL areas. I also want certain Departments and Agencies removed altogether.

But let's talk about the issues you brought up, eh"

Patriot Act: I think it is useful and necessary.

Homeland Security: Again, useful and necessary.

The problem I have with these two issues isn't that they were created, but that they've been used to increase the size, scope and power of the government. Homeland Security, for example, was designed to consolidate all our intelligence agencies under one roof. It's gone beyond that to the point that we have TSA agents doing their thing at sporting events and even on the sidewalks of our streets.

Unnecessary warring: Not sure exactly what you are referring to here, but you seem to have a very simplistic attitude toward violent conflict in the world. Let's take killing bin Laden for example...Do you think it would have been possible to find him and kill him without the resources of established U.S. installations in the area?

Right, so you believe the government should grow in regards to national defense, while others believe government should grow with regards to social policy. Which is more invasive, health care reform or the Patriot Act?
 
Since so many right wingers describe Obama as a "Socialist/Communist/", or some variation thereof, I figure by now they'll have made up their minds about which one of these mutually exclusive political philosophies he is.

Remember though, as Socialist believes in sharing wealth, to many different degrees depending on which flavour they are, a Communist, on the other hand, believes in a classless, stateless society where the means of production are evenly distributed. And if he's a Marxist (as is often claimed), then he wants to attain this through violent revolution.

A point of refernce would help here. Bernie Sanders is a socialist. In what way does Obama differ from him. France has a socialist party that I believe is in power right now. How does that party and its leaders differ from Obama?
 
He spent his formative years surrounded by Marxists, Communists, socialists, Progressives, and liberals. He even managed to find time to hang around with radicals and terrorists. He grew up in Indonesia, an Islamic nation. He is anti-American. He is a foreigner in many ways.

He needs to go.

We need to defeat him so he and the impeached president "Slick willie" can hang around together.

So, he's a Communist, in addition to being an ant-American Islamic fundamentalist, foreigner? Wow.

You might as well just call him Satan.
 
A point of refernce would help here. Bernie Sanders is a socialist. In what way does Obama differ from him. France has a socialist party that I believe is in power right now. How does that party and its leaders differ from Obama?

Consider the way Bernie Sanders would have approached the bank bailout as an example. He would likely do wide scale nationalization as well as some very direct wealth transfers. Obama did not do this, but tried to find more (not completely mind you) market oriented solutions similar to what the top government economists at the time were suggesting.
 
Back
Top Bottom