- Joined
- Feb 1, 2010
- Messages
- 88,719
- Reaction score
- 39,675
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Irrelevant? The entire premise of the 'war on women' is that thems rights is being denied. But thats simply not the case. So NOW we are at..."Yeah...but if they WERE...that would suck!" But...they ARENT.Tell that to the Supreme Court.
I didn't miss it the first time around. I haven't addressed it because it's irrelevant.
Medically indicated contraceptives are not being denied. I know women that are on oral contraceptives because of skin conditions. I know when that are on contraceptives because their doctor recommends it and they arent engaging in sex. Medical needs contraceptives dont appear to be at risk. Therefore the entire Fluke argument is...whats the word you used...'irrelevant'. Oh...theres another word...a 'lie'. Its nothing but a liberal talking point.
Tell it to the administration that backed off.