• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Food Stamp President

Is it a racist remark?


  • Total voters
    52
why don't you explain to us why the blacks have really been helped by dem policies. why their rates of illegitimacy have gone through the roof. why black males make up more than 50% of those doing time or awaiting execution for murder. why blacks of all socioeconomic groups are way behind similarly situated whites in terms of education

we have spent trillions on dem inspired poverty programs-why haven't things changed

did it ever occur to you that telling people-directly and indirectly-that they really aren't capable might be what is really holding them back. That excusing social pathologies only allows those problems to continue

When you pay people to be on government assistance, they tend to stay on government assistance.
 
No. Stop trying to change the subject.



90+ percent of black voters seem to disagree with you. Or maybe they don't, but they're so repulsed by the Republican Party that they vote Democrat anyway. Either way, it doesn't speak well of the GOP.

I guess when every authority figure around them tells them that white people are racist, it becomes the big lie. The one that you tell big enough, and often enough that it becomes the truth...

like the truths they will never hear, that the democrat party started the KKK, or that Jim Crow laws we built and enacted by democrats, that king was a republican, and that it was republican support, not democrat that got the ERA passed. southern democrats fought HARD against the ERA. That the democrats had the only senator in modern times who created a new chapter of the clan... (Robert "Sheets" Byrd as tip o'neal used to call him.)

but no, the parties dropped everything they fought for, for a 100 years and "Swapped sides"

Yeah, that seems legit to me.
 


Yeah, it's the Republicans... they are the haters.
 
I guess when every authority figure around them tells them that white people are racist, it becomes the big lie. The one that you tell big enough, and often enough that it becomes the truth...

This doesn't make any sense for two reasons:
1) If they believed that all white people were racist, then how do you explain their regular habit of voting for white Democratic politicians?
2) If they're so easily misled by some "authority figure," then why haven't the evil Democrats just applied the same technique to other voting blocs? Are the other groups just smarter than blacks?
 


Oops, is that the VP? no way he could be racist...



and not the Secretary of State... not her...
 
This doesn't make any sense for two reasons:
1) If they believed that all white people were racist, then how do you explain their regular habit of voting for white Democratic politicians?
2) If they're so easily misled by some "authority figure," then why haven't the evil Democrats just applied the same technique to other voting blocs? Are the other groups just smarter than blacks?

1) Because they are told the that the Democrat party isnt the party of the whites...

2) Definitely not smarter, maybe just less indoctrinated, ask the likes of Alfonzo Rachel, or C.L. Bryant ( a former local head of the NAACP) what happens when you don't toe the line...
 
Yes of course that`s the case Empirica.

Why don`t you tell us all about how intelligence is based on race.
Actually, the research concluded that intelligence is the result of genetics which is the primary factor of all racial characteristics_

The truth is often unkind__The asian mongoloids beat the euro caucasoids out on the Bell Curve__Oh well, you can't win them all_

I hope this information is what you were looking for J-boo and I'm happy to have been of service to you_ :thumbs:
 
Μολὼν λαβέ;1060848311 said:
When you pay people to be on government assistance, they tend to stay on government assistance.
Yeah, put those lazy starving children out on the street to beg for their food. That'll teach em.
 
Definitely not smarter, maybe just less indoctrinated,

Well, then why do you suppose that blacks have been "indoctrinated" by the evil Democrats to a greater extent than other voting blocs, if they're just as smart? Why don't the Democrats just indoctrinate everyone? :roll:
 
Well, then why do you suppose that blacks have been "indoctrinated" by the evil Democrats to a greater extent than other voting blocs, if they're just as smart? Why don't the Democrats just indoctrinate everyone? :roll:

I am not going to go down this road with you. Just try to be a black man or woman who isnt a democrat, you will be called an "Uncle Tom" you will be shunned by other members of the community... I witnessed
this kind of thing first hand, That anyone trying to better themselves with education was a "Sell Out" or just trying to be "White"

I don't believe for a moment that any one race is more or less intelligent than another... but peer pressure, and your friends can have a major impact on what you do, and what you see.
 
omg!! please forgive my ignorance .... but I thought food stamps went away with World War II .... do they still give food stamps in USA today? :shock:
 
1) Because they are told the that the Democrat party isnt the party of the whites...

And you don't think that black voters are able to turn on their television or computer and notice that most Democratic politicians, like most Republican politicians, are white? For someone who takes great umbrage at accusations of racism, you sure don't seem to have much faith in the intelligence of black people.
 
And you don't think that black voters are able to turn on their television or computer and notice that most Democratic politicians, like most Republican politicians, are white? For someone who takes great umbrage at accusations of racism, you sure don't seem to have much faith in the intelligence of black people.

No sir, I have great faith in them, but they see almost all of the politicians from all sides are white, and that the few blacks they do see are dems... well except for "Uncle Toms" like Herman Cain, and Allen West...

It is you, not I that keeps wanting me to say that blacks are somehow less intelligent... I have now said repeatedly that I think nothing of the sort.

when those around you in leadership continue the big lie ... you believe it.. it doesnt matter who you are, what race you are... it has happened with people of every race and creed... so please let's not attribute to malice, what is a simple disagreement in the reasons why.
 
Can somebody explain please why people need food stamps if we are not in a World Wide War?

why?
 
Can somebody explain please why people need food stamps if we are not in a World Wide War?

why?

Not rationing, that ended after WWII... "Food Stamps" are a supplimental nutrition program set up to provide vouchers for the purchase of food for those who have incomes of 130% of the poverty level or less.
 
Newt said that calling Obama the "food stamp president' was part of his "southern strategy" to win the confederate southern states during the last primary. It must have worked because he won S. Carolina and Georgia. In fact, he got a standing ovation when he said it in S. Carolina. But Newt wasn't the first to use racial coded buzzwords. Goldwater did it, Nixon did it, Reagan did it, GHW Bush did it, GWBush did it ....so nowadays it almost seems natural for the GOP to use blacks as scapegoats to get elected. And why not since they know they aren't going to get the black vote anyway and using coded buzzwords and dog whistle rhetoric helps to shore up the white conservative base....as evidenced by that poll.


****



Lee Atwater: You start out in 1954 by saying, "Nigger, nigger, nigger." By 1968 you can't say "nigger"—that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states' rights and all that stuff. You're getting so abstract now that you're talking about cutting taxes, [foodstamps, unemployment, healthcare, etc.], and all these things you're talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is that blacks get hurt worse than whites.

And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I'm not saying that. But I'm saying that if it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. You follow me—because obviously sitting around saying, "We want to cut this," is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than "Nigger, nigger".

Southern strategy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Not rationing, that ended after WWII... "Food Stamps" are a supplimental nutrition program set up to provide vouchers for the purchase of food for those who have incomes of 130% of the poverty level or less.


oh ok... thank you ... it's all too complicated to me! for me the connotation of food stamps is WW2 ....

TY Schutzengel :)
 
Yes. And is one of the most useful programs. I mean, it's food. If they're poor, it's cool to help them eat better. We all wish there were less fraudsters in the system but I'll guess most of it accomplishes its purpose and uses domestic products for the most part.

Now, if I were asked to come up with a list of MUCH less useful programs.......:)


Not rationing, that ended after WWII... "Food Stamps" are a supplimental nutrition program set up to provide vouchers for the purchase of food for those who have incomes of 130% of the poverty level or less.
 
Newt said that calling Obama the "food stamp president' was part of his "southern strategy" to win the confederate southern states during the last primary.



Please cite this... I have never heard that and if so it is disgusting, if it is what you say it is...
 
I suspect the same people calling Obama the "Food stamp President" are also upset about class warfare. Ironic.
 
Can somebody explain please why people need food stamps if we are not in a World Wide War?

why?
People need foodstamps because they got too many kids they can't feed working for minimum wage.
 
Yes. And is one of the most useful programs. I mean, it's food. If they're poor, it's cool to help them eat better. We all wish there were less fraudsters in the system but I'll guess most of it accomplishes its purpose and uses domestic products for the most part.

Now, if I were asked to come up with a list of MUCH less useful programs.......:)


Wow! that's interesting .... like very socialist isn't it?
 
People need foodstamps because they got too many kids they can't feed working for minimum wage.


ahhhhh ok thank you :)

and why do they have so many kids if they can not feed them?
 
Newt said that calling Obama the "food stamp president' was part of his "southern strategy" to win the confederate southern states during the last primary. It must have worked because he won S. Carolina and Georgia. In fact, he got a standing ovation when he said it in S. Carolina. But Newt wasn't the first to use racial coded buzzwords. Goldwater did it, Nixon did it, Reagan did it, GHW Bush did it, GWBush did it ....so nowadays it almost seems natural for the GOP to use blacks as scapegoats to get elected. And why not since they know they aren't going to get the black vote anyway and using coded buzzwords and dog whistle rhetoric helps to shore up the white conservative base....as evidenced by that poll.


****



Lee Atwater: You start out in 1954 by saying, "Nigger, nigger, nigger." By 1968 you can't say "nigger"—that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states' rights and all that stuff. You're getting so abstract now that you're talking about cutting taxes, [foodstamps, unemployment, healthcare, etc.], and all these things you're talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is that blacks get hurt worse than whites.

And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I'm not saying that. But I'm saying that if it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. You follow me—because obviously sitting around saying, "We want to cut this," is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than "Nigger, nigger".

Southern strategy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I guess POLITICALLY I could see why one would continue a "Southern Strategy" if it worked... but it doesn't

history said:
By winning only in Georgia and South Carolina, and focusing his current efforts on Mississippi and Alabama, Gingrich is following in the footsteps of a half-dozen Republicans and Dixiecrats before him, from Strom Thurmond and George Wallace to Barry Goldwater and Mike Huckabee, who all swept the Deep South but lost their nationwide contests—primaries and general elections—based on marginal organizations, regional appeal, limited messages, or all of the above

I still havent found where Newt said that he was going for a "Southern Strategy" ... but I will keep looking.

Also, Reagan won a heck of a lot more states than just the south,

in 1980,

350px-ElectoralCollege1980_svg.jpg

and he won 49 states in 1984


350px-ElectoralCollege1984_svg.jpg

... I dont think for a moment you can accuse him of a "Southern Strategy"
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom