• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Should Romney Advocate the Sale of California to Mexico?

Should Romney advocate the sale of California to Mexico?

  • It's totally bonkers, but I don't know why.

    Votes: 6 54.5%
  • I dunno. It seems risky.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • It could work.

    Votes: 5 45.5%

  • Total voters
    11
I think we should annex Mexico instead.
 
It seems practicality no longer exists in political thought.
 
What's practical to you isn't automatically practical to someone else.

Supposing practicality is projection. Therefore, anti-social in denying another's faculty of judgment.
 
Only in the daktoria alternate reality does such an idea make any sense at all.
 
I thought Bain is going to buy California for a dollar after the November election.
 
A lot of people have been wondering how Romney can get the Hispanic vote. Well this is how.

He can deport all Hispanic illegal immigrants to California, and then sell California to Mexico. Immigrants get to live in the wealthiest state of the union, Democrats get to say we paid war reparations for the Mexican-American War, and Republicans get rid of the bluest state of the union from Congress as well as Hollywood's liberal celebrity influence.

It's a win-win-win situation. What's the problem?
Good luck balancing the budget without the help of our most populous state and the the state with the highest GDP in the country. Although if it means an electoral advantage, I guess the party probably would happily give up that part of its platform.
 
Good luck balancing the budget without the help of our most populous state and the the state with the highest GDP in the country. Although if it means an electoral advantage, I guess the party probably would happily give up that part of its platform.

California operates at a deficit. Selling would relieve debt, not add onto it.
 
I like the idea.California is attracting as many illegals as possible and most of those illegals are Mexican citizens .But we would have to sell California at a discount or barter some land to Mexico seeing how California is billions of dollars in debt, and Mexico is broke.After we sell California to Mexico we impose a high tariff on Mexican goods.
This from a man where "common sense" exists.
What is scary is that many men do "think" like this...
Hey!
We conquered these lands, unfair and un-square, but that is the way things were.
Now, we must learn to be tolerant.
 
A lot of people have been wondering how Romney can get the Hispanic vote. Well this is how.

He can deport all Hispanic illegal immigrants to California, and then sell California to Mexico. Immigrants get to live in the wealthiest state of the union, Democrats get to say we paid war reparations for the Mexican-American War, and Republicans get rid of the bluest state of the union from Congress as well as Hollywood's liberal celebrity influence.

It's a win-win-win situation. What's the problem?

Whats the problem? Hmmmmmm. I live here. Problem one. I dont like Mexicans. Problem two. I am very well armed. Problem three. My friends and neighbors are very well armed. Problem four. California is not for sale. Problem five. Mexico don't want us. Problem six.
I could go on ad infinitem but I think I've illustrated point.:roll:
 
How could Mexico pay for it?
 
Who cares. Some numbnut douchebag aint gona sell MY state to a third world POS country.:bs

LMAO...it wasn't a serious question.

But, I will always say this about California: California is one of the most beautiful areas of the world, but it is made absolutely intolerable by the governing body.
 
Whats the problem? Hmmmmmm. I live here. Problem one. I dont like Mexicans. Problem two. I am very well armed. Problem three. My friends and neighbors are very well armed. Problem four. California is not for sale. Problem five. Mexico don't want us. Problem six.
I could go on ad infinitem but I think I've illustrated point.:roll:

you are right about five of your six points... there are plenty in mexico who want "THEIR" land back...
 
LMAO...it wasn't a serious question.

But, I will always say this about California: California is one of the most beautiful areas of the world, but it is made absolutely intolerable by the governing body.

I know. :2razz: You are so very right. At least state goverment wise. It gets a bit more complicated. But big picture wise you be right.
 
I know. :2razz: You are so very right. At least state goverment wise. It gets a bit more complicated. But big picture wise you be right.

I forgot to mention: AND THEY CAN'T COOK A HAMBURGER TO SAVE THEIR ASS....PLEASE COME TAKE BACK THAT CHITTY CHITTY IN AND OUT BURGER...FOR THE LOVE OF GOD PLEASE TAKE IT BACK!!!
 
I forgot to mention: AND THEY CAN'T COOK A HAMBURGER TO SAVE THEIR ASS....PLEASE COME TAKE BACK THAT CHITTY CHITTY IN AND OUT BURGER...FOR THE LOVE OF GOD PLEASE TAKE IT BACK!!!

THIS MEANS WAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! IN and OUT Hamburgers are what a hamburger should be, TASTY GOODNESS!!!!!!!!!!. YOU FOUL FIEND insulting the best hamburgers in the world. :shoot :lamo
 
Using the premise, why not trade Arizona for Mexico's oil. Oceanfront property is valuable and we really don't need the price of Chinese goods going up because of increased Panamanian tolls.
 
Back
Top Bottom