Should there be any restrictions to the freedom of speech? Why or why not? If there should be restrictions, what restrictions should there be?
They're out there, they're just not allowed to talk about it.Darn, I was hoping I could find a free speech absolutist.
Only a 17 year old Ron Paul fan would believe that there should be rights without certain limitations.
Should there be any restrictions to the freedom of speech? Why or why not? If there should be restrictions, what restrictions should there be?
Should there be any restrictions to the freedom of speech? Why or why not? If there should be restrictions, what restrictions should there be?
Darn, I was hoping I could find a free speech absolutist.
Before we go any further, can we please get the fire in a crowded theater analogy RIGHT?
It's "shouting fire in a CROWDED theater when THERE IS NO fire" *
*Of course, seeing smoke pour out, you see no fire, but would have reason to believe one may be going on
Very very important distinction.
The overwhelming majority of people, except apparently, you, don't specify because it's assumed that most people don't go around screaming FIRE in empty theaters.
Should there be any restrictions to the freedom of speech? Why or why not? If there should be restrictions, what restrictions should there be?