- Joined
- Jun 10, 2009
- Messages
- 27,254
- Reaction score
- 9,350
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
If Bush hadn't done his tax cut thing, he might have found a way to harness the housing bubble and reduce the deficit even further/more consistently, if not even had a few years of true surplus even despite the dot-com bust. But you know what? The point isn't that Bush shouldn't have cut taxes. The point is that you can't simply credit tax policies for deficit reduction when a credit bubble was driving the economic boom (and hence inflating tax revenues) in the first place.
Sorry the financial experts, including his own economists, say the revenues would have been bigger without the Bush tax cuts, which translates into smaller deficits.
Times were undeniably different then. The ability to do business elsewhere (sheltered from our tax rates) was much more restricted back then than it is now (with the advent of all our internet and communications technology).
That's what conservatives have said each of the few times Democrats have eliminated tax cuts for the wealthy, and it has never ever been the bad thing they try to make it out to be. In fact in every case the economy has improved after the elimination of tax cuts for the wealthy.