- Joined
- Mar 7, 2011
- Messages
- 3,851
- Reaction score
- 1,170
- Location
- EUSSR
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
...lower income consumers are more affected by it because they are less able to afford it.
Catawba, I don't buy this "socialised" fallacy. "Les able to afford it"? Give me a break!
Then let's price everything according to "affordability". The poor will pay cheaper than middle class for electricity, water, gasoline, bread, etc., etc. The rich will pay more, accordingly... Bumps have no income, so let's sell them everything for free. This is absurd, this is upside down!
Last edited: