• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Next sexual taboo to be lifted?

What will be next sexual taboo to be lifted?

  • Incest

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Zoophillia

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Ephebophilia

    Votes: 1 4.5%

  • Necrophilia

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Polygamy

    Votes: 12 54.5%

  • Other (explain)

    Votes: 9 40.9%
  • Total voters
    22
Cyrillic

Cyrillic

Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2012
Messages
187
Reaction score
22
Location
Serb in Slovenia
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
Fornication, miscegenation, adultery and homosexuality were all in past unmoral things today normal 100%.
What is going to be next big thing?

Necrophilia - who really cares they are dead they won't mind
Ephebophilia - there is party in Holland that is fighting for this Partij voor Naastenliefde, Vrijheid & Diversiteit
Zoophillia - animals are getting rights really fast today; also support from PNDV
Incest - use condom and everything is going to be alright

Don't say nothing! If someone asked 50 years ago about gays they would tell to you not to support sick people.
Don't say this isn't provocative I am serious.
 
We can logically say that there are negative aspects with being okay with that type of behavior, and adultery is still not okay today. And the other 3 have nothing to do with your list below, and you can't logically say that there are negative aspects of them as well.
 
Why try to regulate this type f social behavior and why is there a regulation of this type of social behavior in a free society. I find it quite clear and plain. If they want to do it they will, whether openly or in secret. Saying it's against the rules to cheat, obviously, does not really stop cheating and if the person did cheat then it's a clear signal to end the relationship...or do whatever you will. There should be no legislation at all regarding these kinds of things. They might as well make a law determining which hand I should wash with.
 
Cyrillic said:
Fornication, miscegenation, adultery and homosexuality were all in past unmoral things today normal 100%.
What is going to be next big thing?

Necrophilia - who really cares they are dead they won't mind
Ephebophilia - there is party in Holland that is fighting for this Partij voor Naastenliefde, Vrijheid & Diversiteit
Zoophillia - animals are getting rights really fast today; also support from PNDV
Incest - use condom and everything is going to be alright

Don't say nothing! If someone asked 50 years ago about gays they would tell to you not to support sick people.
Don't say this isn't provocative I am serious.
Click to expand...

Necrophilia- illegal and immoral because one party cannot given consent.
Ephebophilia- illegal and immoral because children cannot be used sexually nor can they legally give consent.
Zoophillia- illegal and immoral because one party cannot give consent.
Incest- some states have laws regarding incest between children and parents, but often adult family members having sex with each other is not really illegal.
 
Navy Pride said:
Is this a poll?
Click to expand...

Now it is!

RadicalModerate said:
Necrophilia- illegal and immoral because one party cannot given consent.
Click to expand...
Moral is thing of agreement. And as I said so were gays immoral 50 years ago. What if dead person agrees?

RadicalModerate said:
Ephebophilia- illegal and immoral because children cannot be used sexually nor can they legally give consent.
Click to expand...
They can be asked what they want to be when they grow up and with what parent are they going to live(if divorced) but not sex? I think these other 2 are far more important. Let me remind you that this was normal in ancient Greece and Rome and Far Eastern cultures. Leonardo da Vinci was probably practicing this with his male students. Also they are allowed to have sex among each other.

RadicalModerate said:
Zoophillia- illegal and immoral because one party cannot give consent.
Click to expand...
Wrong! You must have saw at least once in your life dog humping some leg. Also read this Heavy Petting, by Peter Singer It was written by famous Australian philosopher.
 
Cyrillic said:
Now it is!


Moral is thing of agreement. And as I said so were gays immoral 50 years ago. What if dead person agrees?


They can be asked what they want to be when they grow up and with what parent are they going to live(if divorced) but not sex? I think these other 2 are far more important. Let me remind you that this was normal in ancient Greece and Rome and Far Eastern cultures. Leonardo da Vinci was probably practicing this with his male students. Also they are allowed to have sex among each other.


Wrong! You must have saw at least once in your life dog humping some leg. Also read this Heavy Petting, by Peter Singer It was written by famous Australian philosopher.
Click to expand...

a animal can not give consent, a dead person certainly can not ( try and ask one if they agree to do anything, if they answer, they probably are not dead, if they try to eat while engaged in sex, run as they probably are part of the zombie horde

Childern, due to their immaturity can not give legal consent, the age in which they can varies
 
Cyrillic said:
Now it is!


Moral is thing of agreement. And as I said so were gays immoral 50 years ago. What if dead person agrees?
Click to expand...

Fine, if the person gives consent while they are dead, you can bang 'em. :roll:

They can be asked what they want to be when they grow up and with what parent are they going to live(if divorced) but not sex?
Click to expand...

Yes, exactly.

I think these other 2 are far more important. Let me remind you that this was normal in ancient Greece and Rome and Far Eastern cultures. Leonardo da Vinci was probably practicing this with his male students. Also they are allowed to have sex among each other.
Click to expand...

And let me remind you that slaves used to be killed in public for entertainment.

Wrong! You must have saw at least once in your life dog humping some leg. Also read this Heavy Petting, by Peter Singer It was written by famous Australian philosopher.
Click to expand...

So a dog humping a leg means it wants a human sized penis in it???
Click to expand...
 
Cyrillic said:
Fornication, miscegenation, adultery and homosexuality were all in past unmoral things today normal 100%.
What is going to be next big thing?

Necrophilia - who really cares they are dead they won't mind
Ephebophilia - there is party in Holland that is fighting for this Partij voor Naastenliefde, Vrijheid & Diversiteit
Zoophillia - animals are getting rights really fast today; also support from PNDV
Incest - use condom and everything is going to be alright

Don't say nothing! If someone asked 50 years ago about gays they would tell to you not to support sick people.
Don't say this isn't provocative I am serious.
Click to expand...

I thinks it will be a toss up between polygamy and Ephebophilia (the sexual preference of adults for mid-to-late adolescents, generally ages 15 to 19.). But since I can only pick one I picked Polygamy. These are not as vile as zoophilia,necrophilia or Incest.
 
What will be next sexual taboo to be lifted?
Click to expand...
other ..... age of consent.
im not referring to pedophelia.
just the outdated idea that anyone under 18 isnt supposed to have sex.
its already next to impossible to enforce.
 
rocket boy said:
other ..... age of consent.
im not referring to pedophelia.
just the outdated idea that anyone under 18 isnt supposed to have sex.
its already next to impossible to enforce.
Click to expand...

which now that i read the previous posts
i realize what 'ephebophilia' is.
so i guess thats what i meant instead of 'other'.
i suck.
 
Cyrillic said:
Fornication, miscegenation, adultery and homosexuality were all in past unmoral things today normal 100%.
What is going to be next big thing?

Necrophilia - who really cares they are dead they won't mind
Ephebophilia - there is party in Holland that is fighting for this Partij voor Naastenliefde, Vrijheid & Diversiteit
Zoophillia - animals are getting rights really fast today; also support from PNDV
Incest - use condom and everything is going to be alright

Don't say nothing! If someone asked 50 years ago about gays they would tell to you not to support sick people.
Don't say this isn't provocative I am serious.
Click to expand...

I don't see anything wrong with polygamy. I'm a serial monogamist, and I love my wife, and would never want anything more. But I don't see a social imperative to condemn a group of people wanting a social union together.
 
maybe polygamy, because it is usually a mutual relationship whereas others are just the abuse of the ones who are not strong enough to resist .
 
Honestly...I am uncomfortable with any gov't interference in sex life...it does not get more personal than this.

If you wish to slip down a slippery slope, go here, as it is as slippery as it gets.

One of the few reasons I would become violent.
 
I had to vote none...as the list is rather stupid.
 
The premise of this thread is flawed, because it presumes that homosexual behavior is abnormal and should be illegal. Homosexual behavior is not abnormal for homosexuals. Heterosexual behavior would be abnormal for homosexuals because they are not sexually attracted to the opposite sex.

Sex with dead bodies, animals and children all involve having non-consentual sex, otherwise known as rape, with someone or something that cannot consent to the encounter. It is obvious that the suggestion that these activities would ever be made legal and comparing them to homosexuality is ludicrous. (Unless you live in Egypt, where I understand it's okay to have sex with a deceased spouse, so long as the sex occurs before the spouse has been dead for 6 hours... :lol:)

Polygamy and incest between two consenting adults is not necessarily illegal in all states. I don't think it should be illegal in any states, so long as everyone involved is a consenting, uncoerced adult.
 
Polygamy I guess. I don't necessarily have a problem with consenting adults doing as they please.

I am offended that miscegenation was on the list. People of differing races having sex should never have even been a taboo.
 
Sex with the Donal Trump. As disgusting as it may be it's only a matter of time.
 
DiAnna said:
The premise of this thread is flawed, because it presumes that homosexual behavior is abnormal and should be illegal
Click to expand...


Homosexuality is abnormal. It is not average,typical or usual and it deviates from the standard.

Abnormal | Define Abnormal at Dictionary.com

not normal, average, typical, or usual; deviating from a standard: abnormal powers of concentration; an abnormal amount of snow; abnormal behavior.

Homosexual behavior is not abnormal for homosexuals. Heterosexual behavior would be abnormal for homosexuals because they are not sexually attracted to the opposite sex.
Click to expand...

I am sure that to necrophiliacs necrophilia is not abnormal, polygamy is not abnormal to polygamist, Sex with 15-19 year olds is not abnormal to ephebophiles

It is obvious that the suggestion that these activities would ever be made legal and comparing them to homosexuality is ludicrous.
Click to expand...

Homosexuality is considered taboo behavior in many parts of the world and even in this country,So the comparison or what will be the next allowed taboo is valid
 
jamesrage said:
Homosexuality is abnormal. It is not average,typical or usual and it deviates from the standard.

Abnormal | Define Abnormal at Dictionary.com

not normal, average, typical, or usual; deviating from a standard: abnormal powers of concentration; an abnormal amount of snow; abnormal behavior.



I am sure that to necrophiliacs necrophilia is not abnormal, polygamy is not abnormal to polygamist, Sex with 15-19 year olds is not abnormal to ephebophiles



Homosexuality is considered taboo behavior in many parts of the world and even in this country,So the comparison or what will be the next allowed taboo is valid
Click to expand...

And? Does it have to be normal to be allowed?
 
RabidAlpaca said:
And? Does it have to be normal to be allowed?
Click to expand...

Of course not.There are other factors like harm or cost to others, harm to society and other issues in whether or not something should be legal or illegal.
 
jamesrage said:
Of course not.There are other factors like harm or cost to others, harm to society and other issues in whether or not something should be legal or illegal.
Click to expand...

And what harm or cost is it that a union of individuals decide to dedicate themselves to each other for life?
 
Last edited:
I can't even... I just... This has got to be the most extreme slippery slope argument on this issue I've yet seen.

Somebody already summed up the reason why most "taboos" won't be legalized.

But lets think about the whole "immoral" and "unacceptable" argument for gay sex and adultery "in the past".

Historical records indicate that promiscuity, adultery, swinging, and homosexual sex were acceptable and common practices in several cultures at different points in time over the last few thousand years. Historically speaking, it is not as though the modern mentality of acceptance is new, unique, or all that outrageous. But by all means, let's not let historical record and fact distract us.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom