• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Who will you vote for in the 2012 presidential election...

Who will you vote for in the 2012 Presidential Election?


  • Total voters
    113
The choice is this election couldn't be more crystal clear:

Do you support the man who has a history of dismantling American companies and sending American jobs overseas in order to pad his own pocket and the pockets of corporate shareholders or the man who has been trying to protect the middle class?

Do you support the man who says "Corporations are people my friend" or the man who says "people are people"?

Do you support the man who believes that Big Government is the best one to make the most intimate decisions in your life or the man who believes that those choices are best left to the individual?

Do you support the man who believes that the biggest tax breaks should go to the wealthiest 1% of Americans or the man who believes that the middle class deserves a break and that it is time that the wealthiest 1% should pay their far share.


The choice is clear

Do we return to the policies that got us into this mess in the first place?
 
Anybody else find it hilarious that the Republican candidate is a guy who made his wealth by saddling sound, debt free companies with as much debt as they could possibly absorb, sell off any assets worth having, and then some, and then leave them to go bankrupt at the first, and inevitable, downturn to come along? Hiding behind lax corporate bankruptcy laws limiting their personal liability for failure to nothing, naturally. That's what 'private equity' companies do, and of course they get huge tax breaks to do that as well. But somehow, they'll magically solve the debt problem. lol ... and I'm the Pope. Want to kiss my ring?
 
Last edited:
The choice is this election couldn't be more crystal clear:

True, but the choice is 'None of the above', not a Democrat or a Republican. They're just competing factions of billionaires, both 'globalist' and both avid fans of selling the country out for personal gain.
 
I'm super surprised that this poll didn't get spammed to show a lopsided Romney victory. Always some immature right leaning poster logs off and spams the poll till it shows what they want it to show. It's pretty damn obvious with a public poll, but clearly after dozens of that **** happening, whoever is doing it isn't smart enough to figure out it's public.

That said, it's a choice between Bush's Fourth Term or Romney "I have no beliefs."

Urgh.
 
It's just a 'Good Cop- Bad Cop' racket, and the media, right or left, rakes in billions off of this, so don't look for them to be of any use or reliability. They have a huge financial stake in perpetuating the scam, even in off years.
 
Last edited:
Well, a lot of people don't beleive that because it's a fairy tale.

...And that backs up what I said.

I think this is very true:
"The free market is the only economic system that produces on a sustainable basis, and for the overwhelming majority of Americans, an abundance of food, housing, energy, and medicine--staples of human survival; it creates an astonishing array of consumer goods that add comfort, value, and security to the quality of life; and the free market recognizes that it is in man’s DNA to take risks, to innovate, to achieve, to compete, and to acquire--to not only survive but also improve his circumstance."
 
True, but the choice is 'None of the above', not a Democrat or a Republican. They're just competing factions of billionaires, both 'globalist' and both avid fans of selling the country out for personal gain.

"none of the above" should always be an option; but, with some reservations, I'll vote Obama.
Strange to the conservatives, but I find him to be too conservative...perhaps the problem is - I'm too liberal ???
 
It explains much that you don't know the difference between a libertarian and a liberal?

I see we are getting into the normal 'liberal' sort of responses. Since you do not recall, you said:

"Yes, the last one was in 2008. "

In response to being asked if you have ever voted for a conservative for president. In 2008, there was McCain, in some states Ron Paul, and then some unknown/unmemorable 3rd party people as well. You said the last one was not McCain, when asked if it was Ron Paul you give the above response?

A diversion and bad attempted at calling another person stupid. Wow, that's new.

How about since you said you had voted for a conservative in 2008, you just say who that conservative is?

Or do you not want to discredit yourself by saying it was Obama and having the world laugh at you?
 
You have to take into consideration that this forum leans heavily to rthe left they just don't like to identify themselves as such but their posts give them away as the liberals they are.........


I have noticed a lot of people that post things generally 'left' in concept, often have 'undisclosed' or anything other than 'left/liberal' in their lean. I commented before about this, and several lost their minds about it.
 
The choice is this election couldn't be more crystal clear:

Do you support the man who has a history of dismantling American companies and sending American jobs overseas in order to pad his own pocket and the pockets of corporate shareholders or the man who has been trying to protect the middle class?

Do you support the man who says "Corporations are people my friend" or the man who says "people are people"?

Do you support the man who believes that Big Government is the best one to make the most intimate decisions in your life or the man who believes that those choices are best left to the individual?

Do you support the man who believes that the biggest tax breaks should go to the wealthiest 1% of Americans or the man who believes that the middle class deserves a break and that it is time that the wealthiest 1% should pay their far share.

There's some talking points rhetoric right there.
 
Nobody, I repeat nobody can outspend your daddy Hussein Obama............He has spent more in 3 years then all the other Presidents combined........try again
What is your point in referring to him by his middle name? Yes, it is his middle name... so what? It's not like he chose it. It's not like he uses it in daily life. It's not like he was born after people like Saddam came to power, and his parents chose it for that reason. Hence, it doesn't mean anything.,.. AT ALL. I tend to immediately dismiss people's opinions out-of-hand when they pull juvenile crap like this, as it clearly and undeniably demonstrates a complete and utter lack of objectivity in their thinking. If I can't trust you to think logically on something as meaningless as their given name, then I certainly cannot trust you to put rational thought into anything that needs rational thought. Your failure is already demonstrated and proven. But I'll give you the chance to provide a reasonable and rationalization explanation as to why his middle name is relevant and meaningful in a political discussion.

Have at it.
 
I will not be voting for either of them. Two peas in the same Goldman Sachs pod as far as I'm concerned. I'll probably vote for Governor Johnson, or another third party candidate.
 
...And that backs up what I said.

I think this is very true:
"The free market is the only economic system that produces on a sustainable basis, and for the overwhelming majority of Americans, an abundance of food, housing, energy, and medicine--staples of human survival; it creates an astonishing array of consumer goods that add comfort, value, and security to the quality of life; and the free market recognizes that it is in man’s DNA to take risks, to innovate, to achieve, to compete, and to acquire--to not only survive but also improve his circumstance."

The free market is fine and dandy when properly regulated - due to the nature of man, this regulation is necessary.
There are two ways of doing this regulation.
One is stifling, layers and layers of rules, many contradictorily, and at multiple levels, international, national, state, county and local...and to treat all businessmen as if they are all criminals....in other words, getting carried away(the nature of man, again)
This, of course, we do not have...but, at times, it seems as if we do.
Two is zero regulation, no rules, let the buyer beware at all times, the way things were during our caveman days.
We need something in-between...a balance if you will....
I am saying that the free market has been abused....a problem with greed, for one.
 
I see we are getting into the normal 'liberal' sort of responses. Since you do not recall, you said:

"Yes, the last one was in 2008. "

In response to being asked if you have ever voted for a conservative for president. In 2008, there was McCain, in some states Ron Paul, and then some unknown/unmemorable 3rd party people as well. You said the last one was not McCain, when asked if it was Ron Paul you give the above response?

A diversion and bad attempted at calling another person stupid. Wow, that's new.

How about since you said you had voted for a conservative in 2008, you just say who that conservative is?

Or do you not want to discredit yourself by saying it was Obama and having the world laugh at you?

I voted for Obama in 2008, who is only slightly less conservative than McCain, because the liberal candidate, Dennis Kucinch, withdrew from the race.
 
I voted for Obama in 2008, who is only slightly less conservative than McCain, because the liberal candidate, Dennis Kucinch, withdrew from the race.

So when you say that yes, you have voted for a conservative, you are talking about Obama. Well, that explains the disconnect. Thanks.
 
i cant seem to tell the difference much between the two,so i will just vote third party.

Really? Really? Really? Our you joking? DOn't you know how evil Obama is?
 
So when you say that yes, you have voted for a conservative, you are talking about Obama. Well, that explains the disconnect. Thanks.

You may wish to bookmark this for future reference:

liberal Democrat - Dennis Kucinich

medium_dennis25.jpg




conservative Democrat - President Obama

220px-Official_portrait_of_Barack_Obama.jpg
 
I will not be voting for either of them. Two peas in the same Goldman Sachs pod as far as I'm concerned. I'll probably vote for Governor Johnson, or another third party candidate.

Hussein Obama thanks you.......
 
I'm super surprised that this poll didn't get spammed to show a lopsided Romney victory. Always some immature right leaning poster logs off and spams the poll till it shows what they want it to show. It's pretty damn obvious with a public poll, but clearly after dozens of that **** happening, whoever is doing it isn't smart enough to figure out it's public.

That said, it's a choice between Bush's Fourth Term or Romney "I have no beliefs."

Urgh.

Judging by the results of the poll spaming just might of happened favoring Hussein Obama
 
Judging by the results of the poll spaming just might of happened favoring Hussein Obama

Who is this Husseun Obam guy you are so fixated on?

If you would have bothered to check before making accusations you would see the vote among members is 35 Obama, 24 Romney with 7 extra votes each, probably from unregistered guests. Facts are actually important my left wing friend.
 
Who is this Husseun Obam guy you are so fixated on?

If you would have bothered to check before making accusations you would see the vote among members is 35 Obama, 24 Romney with 7 extra votes each, probably from unregistered guests. Facts are actually important my left wing friend.

We don't know that....They are probably from some of your left wing friends in DP voting 2 or 3 times...........
 
Don't tell me our rightwing friends are bussing in illegal voters from out of Debate Politics County to skew the poll in Romney's favor! Fraud, I say! Fraud! :shock:

But it doesn't surprise me. :cool:
 
We don't know that....They are probably from some of your left wing friends in DP voting 2 or 3 times...........

Then why is their only 7 extra votes per candidate? If left wingers are trying to stuff the ballot, why stop at only 7. Why is it those 7 are nefarious, but the 7 for Romney are not?
 
Then why is their only 7 extra votes per candidate? If left wingers are trying to stuff the ballot, why stop at only 7. Why is it those 7 are nefarious, but the 7 for Romney are not?

No one can explain that.............
 
Back
Top Bottom