• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The new definition of "Racist".

What do you think of the new definition?

  • Total voters
    34
Efforts to better this race are like forcing a coach to spend all his time training the boys who didn't make the team. The key point in this analogy that everyone is overlooking is that we are neglecting those with talent. We only have so much money to go around and must spend it where it will eventually pay off, not waste it on evolution's losers. Blacks themselves are dependent on America concentrating solely on tested superiority, the pre-Civil Rights development of which is the only reason they have always been better off than their cousins left in Africa. Unfair means they fare better.
 
Blackdog said:
It's like turning on a light and watching the cockroaches scatter. Anytime you hit em with the tough questions based on fact, they scurry away to hide.
Click to expand...
And the references are obvious. Instead, he should have asked, "How is it weak to stand up for our national ideals?" , "Whose fault is it that they act like savages?" instead of pretending he didn't understand the references. If we followed the Liberals' definition of our ideals, we'd turn the country back over to the Indians and let them keep everything we built here. We'd wimp out like Reginald Denney and feel all touchy-feely and morally superior about letting a wild herd of Africans trample us down. Liberals have a secret desire to be raped or to cheer at the rape of civilization.
 
Thunder said:
disgusting strawman.
Click to expand...
Only if you respect the self-appointed expertise of our sociologists. Historically, such intellectual authorities have often pushed superstitions, but that doesn't mean that today's multiculturalism can't be irrational. I respect only what I see and my own ability to compare it to other eras and societies. The intelligent view in the past was that such races are inferior. There is nothing wrong with turning back the clock if it is connected to a time bomb.
 
PrometheusBound said:
...We'd wimp out like Reginald Denney and feel all touchy-feely and morally superior about letting a wild herd of Africans trample us down. Liberals have a secret desire to be raped or to cheer at the rape of civilization.
Click to expand...

your racism is disgusting, ignorant, and pathetic.
 
Thunder said:
your racism is disgusting, ignorant, and pathetic.
Click to expand...

Your racism is worse. You hide it under an umbrella of respectability. Your racism is labeled as "caring", when it fact it's dishonest, boot licking, and evil.
 
PrometheusBound said:
Also, the Liberals' cognitive dissonance in saying that Rednecks are stupid but dismissing Blacks' low IQ scores by saying that there is no way to measure or judge intelligence. The point is that we can't judge other races the way we normally judge people in our own race. Leave your brains at the door when you enter the multicultie fantasyland.
Click to expand...

And this will totally help the "not racist" defense. "It's not racism to say blacks aren't as smart as whites."

Umm...yes it is.
 
rocket88 said:
And this will totally help the "not racist" defense. "It's not racism to say blacks aren't as smart as whites."

Umm...yes it is.
Click to expand...

Yep, I agree. It's also racist to keep claiming Black Americans are being denied equal rights and justice.
 
Neal N. Bloeme said:
Your racism is worse. You hide it under an umbrella of respectability. Your racism is labeled as "caring", when it fact it's dishonest, boot licking, and evil.
Click to expand...


So actually saying that one race is inferior is somehow better???

You just want to paint everyone to your left as the worst people ever to exist, and in your desperation to prove it you can't look at an actual racist statement if it doesn't come from "the big Evil Left."

BTW, your sig is offensive. Michelle Obama's ass is not an issue.
 
rocket88 said:
So actually saying that one race is inferior is somehow better???

You just want to paint everyone to your left as the worst people ever to exist, and in your desperation to prove it you can't look at an actual racist statement if it doesn't come from "the big Evil Left."

BTW, your sig is offensive. Michelle Obama's ass is not an issue.
Click to expand...

Nope. YOU are the one who said "So actually saying that one race is inferior is somehow better". Not me.

I don't care if you find my sig offensive.
 
PrometheusBound said:
"The White devil made them do it"? No, it is the devil inside them that drives their unfit behavior. Turning these people loose on society is no more humanitarian than turning other wild creatures loose. Their behavior in Africa and Haiti, where they have escaped from White domination, proves that it is nature rather than nurture and not the multiculturalists' dangerous and self-assured theory of outside rather than inside forces driving the whole plague.
Click to expand...

That is a completely and utterly ignorant statement. Do you know anything about the history of Haiti or Africa? I mean anything at all? Now you call blacks the equivalent of wild animals and expect to be taken seriously? LMAO!
 
PrometheusBound said:
And the references are obvious. Instead, he should have asked, "How is it weak to stand up for our national ideals?" , "Whose fault is it that they act like savages?" instead of pretending he didn't understand the references. If we followed the Liberals' definition of our ideals, we'd turn the country back over to the Indians and let them keep everything we built here. We'd wimp out like Reginald Denney and feel all touchy-feely and morally superior about letting a wild herd of Africans trample us down. Liberals have a secret desire to be raped or to cheer at the rape of civilization.
Click to expand...

He is me, and I was pointing out your cowardice and ignorance, nothing more. I mean you have no real argument and no evidence to back any of it up. It's just Storm Front hyperbole at it's best. That is why you ignored it.
 
Last edited:
Now lets talk about the real misinformation you are spouting...

A national report released this week by financial aid guru Mark Kantrowitz finds minority students are less likely to win private scholarships or receive merit-based institutional grants than Caucasian students – a pattern that also holds true in CA
Click to expand...


Less likely to WIN or receive MERIT-BASED....

And that just HAS to be due to racism. It couldn't possibly be because they are less qualified. Always has to be because of racism. Always have to blame someone else. :roll:
 
OscarB63 said:
Less likely to WIN or receive MERIT-BASED....

And that just HAS to be due to racism. It couldn't possibly be because they are less qualified. Always has to be because of racism. Always have to blame someone else. :roll:
Click to expand...

Yea ignore the rest, got ya! :2wave:

No the article says nothing about racism being the cause or being less qualified. You have been wrong so many times at this point why don't you just shut it and try and learn something. It is simple if you would actually read the article before showing your ignorance of the subject matter yet again...

This does not appear to be due to deliberate discrimination, but rather as a natural result of the personal interests of the scholarship sponsors. Scholarship sponsors tend to establish scholarships that select for characteristics, activities and talents of interest to them. These factors, in turn, tend to resonate with students of the same racial background as the sponsor. For example, African-American students are much less likely to participate in equestrian sports (horseback riding, polo, rodeo), water sports (scuba diving, sailing, surfing, swimming, crew, water polo) and winter sports (ice hockey, skiing, snowboarding, figure skating) than Caucasian students.

Has nothing to do with racism.
 
Last edited:
OscarB63 said:
Less likely to WIN or receive MERIT-BASED....

And that just HAS to be due to racism. It couldn't possibly be because they are less qualified. Always has to be because of racism. Always have to blame someone else. :roll:
Click to expand...

Once again: the notion that -- in the absence of remedial measures (like affirmative action) the previous and/or otherwise dominant hiring and admissions systems would be meritocratic...is a deeply racist notion, because the material facts of privilege (the fact that "white" people are disproportionately represented among the wealthy and the well-connected) would -- IF one was under the delusion of believing that we are (for the most part) living under a meritocracy -- lead one inevitably to the conclusion that "white" folks are just better/smarter/harder-working than everyone else (or else how could they have accumulated their privilege?!?).

Of course, in reality, hiring and admissions isn't meritocratic even on a good day. There is an artificially scarce number of feasible job opportunities and an artificially scarce number of admissions slots for college education. As such, employers and colleges necessarily engage in all kinds of filtering and discrimination to figure out who will and who will not be offered a position or admission. The question is not IF such institutions will discriminate -- as they're currently set up, they HAVE to -- rather the question is to who extent are the bases of that discrimination grounded in some kind of substantive assessment of applicants.

Specific institutions may have conscientious -- and even well-designed and implemented -- systems for not *adding onto* the "normal"/ "background radiation" level of unjust discrimination, but they cannot possibly fully cancel out the already-manifest forms of discrimination applicants have been living with before they apply. All the usual disparities -- attached to the usual bases of discrimination -- affect applicants' chances by impacting their lives long before any of them fills out an application. Furthermore, job opportunities are based upon a combination of connections (access to/knowledge of opportunities) and bargaining power, which is NOT the same thing as competence in the job/work role itself. Academic admissions is heavily tilted in favor of compliance with authority and high grades, which also do NOT reliably measure competence in a subject (rather, they measure competence in complying with external demands imposed upon them by authority figures).

A REAL meritocracy would be very messy, time consuming to switch to, and most of all it would be revolutionary, as it would inevitably force a resolution of the conflict between merit-based full employment (damn near everyone can do something well enough to warrant making a living...IF merit is truly the basis of recognition and hire...vs. the artificial scarcity of gainful employment imposed by capitalism (no substantial surplus labor pool = loss of the primary means of forcing people to accept underpayment for their work).

So these issues cut much deeper than superficial (and rarely examined) notions of merit.
 
Neal N. Bloeme said:
I don't care if you find my sig offensive.
Click to expand...

And that is the point of it is it not?

Race baiting posts are suppose to be offensive are they not?

Repeatedly repeating extremist right wing talking points about race and people of other races are suppose to be offensive are they not?

Starting threads for the purpose of bashing other races or getting out the extremist message on race are suppose to be offensive are they not?

That is fundamental and basic to the role of the provocateur.
 
Thunder said:
your racism is disgusting, ignorant, and pathetic.
Click to expand...
Also banned. Except in the phony sites owned by anti-semites, the Internet has no place for the common opinions of the common people.
 
rocket88 said:
And this will totally help the "not racist" defense. "It's not racism to say blacks aren't as smart as whites."

Umm...yes it is.
Click to expand...
You just flunked the IQ test. No wonder you want them discredited!
 
PrometheusBound said:
Also banned. Except in the phony sites owned by anti-semites, the Internet has no place for the common opinions of the common people.
Click to expand...

:lol: :lol:

You see that's the problem. You are the minority, not the common man or people. You are the outcast that needs to belittle others so you don't sink and drown in your own ****.
 
The problem with racism is it's built upon the word race. All of the races that I've been to have produced a winner. No such luck here. I'd like to find out who the idiot was that determined that a word used for speed competition should also be used to describe groups of homo-sapiens (Latin for wise man).

He was probably a racist.

Welcome back Oscar.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom