• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is there a "War on Women" in the United States?

Is there a War on Women?


  • Total voters
    118
What was factual? A picture? What is a "factual picture"? In any case, please return to the emotional appeals that surely bring up the intellectual discourse.

Or you could just answer my question instead of bitching about it.
 
And one is a bad term. Pro life has a huge scope. I take it to mean what it says. If they want to be called pro life they should be. If the want to be anti-choice that's different. The meaning of words is important.

Pro-Choice has a huge scope. I mean, if you truly see a difference it's only because you really want to see a difference. Functionally they are equivalent. They are both propaganda terms for the abortion debate.
 
No your not you twisted my words. If they die while murdering their unborn babies we are better off. Then we do not have to incarcerate them for MURDER. Saves the tax payers money that could be used to feed the children who may have been aborted. What comes around goes around.
So again, you want to outlaw abortion just so that unborn babies can grow up to be women that you'll just write off with "what goes around comes around". Mmmkay.
 
The point is the double standard
The point was responded to in a past post. I have been responded considerable time on here as I try and respond to every post directed my way. My answer is that right or left the term pisses me off. It should not be used when men get high fives and notches on their belts.
 
Or you could just answer my question instead of bitching about it.
I'm not bitching about it. I'm pointing out that it was an emotional appeal.
 
I'm not bitching about it. I'm pointing out that it was an emotional appeal.

I realize that abortion is an emotional topic. Posting a picture of a fetus at 26 weeks and asking "Is this life?" is merely another question in the debate of when life begins/what is life/etc.. If it appeals to your emotions, that's a good thing. It should.
 
It is a myth to say that all kinds of women died from iilegal abortions prior to Roe V Wade...Many more have died since then, around 42,000,000 to be exact.........
Only that many died in the heads that think that is actually more than unwanted cells. In the rest of the heads it was an abortion.
 
Let's recap. I said that when I was a child I lost a 14 yr old friend who died from an illegal abortion. You said:



So the answer is yes, you believe that any female regardless of age who choses to terminate a pregnancy should die. Got it.

If they do not die while murdering their child they should go to prison. When a guy walks into a store to rob it. Then shoots and kills the clerk and another clerk shoots the theif. Are we better off that a murderer is off the streets and we do not have to pay to incarcerate him? I say yes. Just as we are better off if a murderer dies while killing her unborn child. Simple logic, try it some time.
 
I realize that abortion is an emotional topic. Posting a picture of a fetus at 26 weeks and asking "Is this life?" is merely another question in the debate of when life begins/what is life/etc.. If it appeals to your emotions, that's a good thing. It should.
No, it's an emotional appeal not because of what it does to the person looking at the picture (and it actually did nothing btw). It's an emotional appeal because it tries to use emotion rather than logic to make an argument. If it wasn't an emotional appeal, then you would have just asked the question without the picture.
 
So again, you want to outlaw abortion just so that unborn babies can grow up to be women that you'll just write off with "what goes around comes around". Mmmkay.

how did you become so ****ing dense. Did mommy drop you on you head?
 
"War on Women" seems to be the popular buzz phrase lately. Do you believe there is a war against women in this country right now?

We don't have a problem with you women as long as you don't demand that we pay for your contraception drugs.

You have equal employment opportunities, get a job and pay for it with your own income.
 
how did you become so ****ing dense. Did mommy drop you on you head?
So you want to outlaw abortion so that unborn children can grow up into adults like me just so you talk to them like crap and be condescending. Mmmmkay.
 
No, it's an emotional appeal not because of what it does to the person looking at the picture (and it actually did nothing btw). It's an emotional appeal because it tries to use emotion rather than logic to make an argument. If it wasn't an emotional appeal, then you would have just asked the question without the picture.

Showing a picture of what a fetus looks like at 26 weeks isn't logical?
 
My daughter had an abortion at a planned parenthood murder mill 11 years ago. She has had to live with that since. She is now pro life. Jane Roe is also pro life now. You do know who she is right Roe v Wade
You probably really make her feel good about herself as well and were there when she needed you most. I hope.
 
Showing a picture of what a fetus looks like at 26 weeks isn't logical?
Not unless the debate is about the physiology of a 26 week old.

I feel like you're being intentionally obtuse like when you said you were interested in other peoples' opinions right after mocking other people's opinions.
 
"War on Women" seems to be the popular buzz phrase lately. Do you believe there is a war against women in this country right now?

Only unborn women :)
 
Is this life?

You know, there's a big part of me that says life begins at conception. Truthfully, I've yet to hear what's so magical about passing through a vagina that imparts life. If that were true, wouldn't my penis be alive?

But the libertarian in my says it should be legal. It shouldn't be for government to make moral decisions for you.
 
Wait a minute are you insinuating that liberal women are not dirty and skanky? Is it true that they don't shave their armpits or bath very often? I also here it said that they participate in orgies and don't brush their teeth afterwords.
When did it become a requirement for women to shave under their arms or there legs. Is this enforced by laws? When do men shave their legs and armpits?
 
You know, there's a big part of me that says life begins at conception. Truthfully, I've yet to hear what's so magical about passing through a vagina that imparts life. If that were true, wouldn't my penis be alive?

But the libertarian in my says it should be legal. It shouldn't be for government to make moral decisions for you.
There's nothing magical about it. There's just the fact that the child is now an individual no longer within the realm of the woman's body and privacy.
 
Back
Top Bottom