OhIsee.Then
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2011
- Messages
- 1,581
- Reaction score
- 277
- Location
- MI and AZ
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
As was pointed out to me earlier, this is probably connected to Obama Care and therefore would be incremental cost. I mean, if women's BC would be covered at no cost, I would think that the addition of men counciling and doctors visits would add incremental cost to the healthcare system since that would also be covered at no cost to the patient.
It's not a testing procedure (or maybe it is), the function actually is a requirement (as was done in the Oklahoma law) for the mother to listen and hear the baby's heart beat before the abortion takes place. I'm not sure what process does that whether it's an ultrasound or some other method... but yes, that would also be an additional cost just like men's viagra counseling.
Oh my gosh! You think the bill is intended to pass? The woman proposing the law wouldn't vote for it's passage?
I thought you were just considering the cost of having it run through the process in their legislature.
If one is consistent, you should vote for both or neither. This is obvious, right?