• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Who is more offensive, Obama or Rush?

Which is more offensive?

  • Rush using a naughty word

    Votes: 30 68.2%
  • Obama forcing institutions to either cover abortion pills or close their doors

    Votes: 7 15.9%
  • Obama forcing religious institutions to cover abortion while he cuts military health benefits

    Votes: 7 15.9%

  • Total voters
    44
May they scrape moss and leaves from the rocks to get by.
 
If a church has employees it's not a church but a business. Hospitals, orphanages, and schools are businesses or public services and thus can be regulated as such.




I will believe that religion advocates really advocate the religious convictions of people who don't want to pay for birth control when those advocates also lobby for the decriminalization of marijuana because of Rastafarians and lobby for polyandrous marriage because of fundamentalist Mormons. Besides, a universal health care system would make all these points rather moot.


So Rush is, by far, more offensive.

What about Obama doesn't have the power to force people and businesses to do things they don't believe in, don't you understand. You believe in fascist dictatorships as long as they meet your political objectives, don't you?
 
What about Obama doesn't have the power to force people and businesses to do things they don't believe in, don't you understand. You believe in fascist dictatorships as long as they meet your political objectives, don't you?


Why don't YOU go work in a sweat shop making **** for pay with no benefits? That's what your side of the aisle is shooting for isn't it?


....AND the horse you rode in on.
 
What about Obama doesn't have the power to force people and businesses to do things they don't believe in, don't you understand. You believe in fascist dictatorships as long as they meet your political objectives, don't you?

No, I don't.
 
Why don't YOU go work in a sweat shop making **** for pay with no benefits? That's what your side of the aisle is shooting for isn't it?


....AND the horse you rode in on.
Stop with the hyperbole, it's nauseating.
 
No, I don't.

Then stop defending that ****ing socialist and come to your senses. Just because Harvard graduate Constitution professor Barack Obama is a huge ****ing moron on the 1st Amendment, doesn't mean you have to defend him beyond reason. You are smarter than Obama, almost anyone is. So Limbaugh ****ed up, Obama has power which makes him dangerous. Limbaugh can't hurt you, Obama can.
 
I'm shaking in my little space boots.
 
Then stop defending that ****ing socialist and come to your senses. Just because Harvard graduate Constitution professor Barack Obama is a huge ****ing moron on the 1st Amendment, doesn't mean you have to defend him beyond reason. You are smarter than Obama, almost anyone is. So Limbaugh ****ed up, Obama has power which makes him dangerous. Limbaugh can't hurt you, Obama can.

:roll: - You should wear a crown and call yourself the King of Inflated Egos. I'd love to find out your education and line of work. Maybe then we could take you up on your claim that "almost everyone" is smarter than Obama. I assume you included yourself in that "almost everyone".
 
Then stop defending that ****ing socialist and come to your senses. Just because Harvard graduate Constitution professor Barack Obama is a huge ****ing moron on the 1st Amendment, doesn't mean you have to defend him beyond reason. You are smarter than Obama, almost anyone is. So Limbaugh ****ed up, Obama has power which makes him dangerous. Limbaugh can't hurt you, Obama can.

Governments have power to regulate businesses, especially for the public good in relation to consumer protections, safety compliance, and environmental well-being. If a church doesn't want to be regulated as a business then they should not be a business. Instead they should stick to being a church.

It's really that simple.
 
Governments have power to regulate businesses, especially for the public good in relation to consumer protections, safety compliance, and environmental well-being. If a church doesn't want to be regulated as a business then they should not be a business. Instead they should stick to being a church.

It's really that simple.

I thought I already told you this is not based on anything not long ago? Did you find out something new or is it just your personal belief like it was the last time?
 
I thought I already told you this is not based on anything not long ago? Did you find out something new or is it just your personal belief like it was the last time?

Actually, it's common sense. It's not my fault if judges lack any.
 
Actually, it's common sense. It's not my fault if judges lack any.

Well that is a problem. You are basically saying they should extend the commerce clause that they already extended beyond reason and WAY past its intention and not even they are going that far. That should tell you something.
 
Well that is a problem. You are basically saying they should extend the commerce clause that they already extended beyond reason and WAY past its intention and not even they are going that far. That should tell you something.

No. I'm saying that if churches don't want to be regulated as businesses then they should not perform services as a business.
 
Ahh a partisan hack poll.. How interesting...

Whats more idiotic? A.) This poll. or B.) This poll.
 
No. I'm saying that if churches don't want to be regulated as businesses then they should not perform services as a business.

I know your position. We have been over this already.
 
Obama weakens our nation, encourages class warfare, lies about the wealthy and generally is one sorry assed president. Rush is an entertainer. If I don't turn him on he has absolutely no relevance to my life nor costs me any money, liberty or freedom
 
Obama weakens our nation,
Even tho he has increased military spending

encourages class warfare,
So do republicans now i guess....

lies about the wealthy
He has?
How do you lie about a group of people?

and generally is one sorry assed president.
Lame

Rush is an entertainer. If I don't turn him on he has absolutely no relevance to my life nor costs me any money, liberty or freedom
But Obama does.. Right?
 
claiming the rich don't pay their fair share of taxes is a bald faced lie. Obama's a turd pure and simple

the fat man is just an entertainer-no different or less polite than left wing counterparts like "John Stewart" and Bill Maher
 
Obama rocks!

Neener, neener.

LOL!
 
Rush isn't offensive because he's conservative.

Rush is offensive because he's a dickhead and wants attention.

Well of course that's the real truth. In reality Obama's not my Lord and Savior either. Just trying to trick out the real point of the thread without having to go through 280 replies before he finally got to say what he wanted.
 
Back
Top Bottom