• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Guns

What do you think gun control should be like?

  • Let everyone have a gun

    Votes: 19 22.4%
  • Quick background check to purchase and carry

    Votes: 25 29.4%
  • Quick background check to purchase, but more difficult to carry

    Votes: 11 12.9%
  • Background check, waiting period for purchase and carrying.

    Votes: 17 20.0%
  • Background check, waiting period, no carrying

    Votes: 5 5.9%
  • No guns at all

    Votes: 8 9.4%

  • Total voters
    85
Status
Not open for further replies.
please name a left-wing oriented Militia in the USA.

thanks.
Already told you Black Panthers. You don't even realize you're mistake, sad.

EDIT - Also the KKK, betcha didn't know that they were organized by the Democrat party in the 1800s as a terrorist militia group.
 
Already told you Black Panthers. You don't even realize you're mistake, sad.

they were not a Militia.

their descendants, the New Black Panther Party, are Muslim Black-nationalist.

now, let's try again: please name a left-wing Militia in the USA.

thanks.
 
they were not a Militia.

their descendants, the New Black Panther Party, are Muslim Black-nationalist.

now, let's try again: please name a left-wing Militia in the USA.

thanks.
They are militias, they drill as such. You want to admit your mistake or continue into failure? I don't care being you've lost this already, your choice.
 
by what cockamaimee, half-assed, bull**** definition of "Militia", do you consider the Black Panthers to have been a Militia?

:lamo
They meet regularly, train in tactics, organize, oh and have you forgotten about the weapons they brandished at the polling place in '08? They are a militia and you don't have a single chance at credibility if you continue this asinine tactic of trying to act like you think you've accomplished a "gotcha" moment. You've been nailed here and there really isn't much left to say except. Here are a few more, ELF, ALF, The Hutaree, Greenpeace, etc. And yes they are considered militias by standard definition. So quit trying to deflect, I've already shown you the definition of such and the true explanation, everyone has shown you aren't qualified to make further assessments here. Deal with it.
 
You have already admitted in this very thread that you view the Second Amendment as a pure good. You are so far out there on that extremist limb that you cannot even see any negative or bad that comes from it even when I admit that the good far outweighs that negative small part. That puts you in the hopelessly irrational category. There is simply no rational discussion with such an extremist.

how can a right be anything but good? if someone misuses the right that does not tarnish it in the least because we know damn well that in areas where the second amendment does not exist, guns are obtained and used for ill. You are the extremist because you pretend you support the right which is a bald faced lie

Your flushed thread about calling innocent slain children "heroes of the second amendment" was one of the most pathetic threads in terms of dishonesty and trolling I have ever seen on this board in almost 7 years
 
by what cockamaimee, half-assed, bull**** definition of "Militia", do you consider the Black Panthers to have been a Militia?

:lamo

I strongly object to those views as being characterized as "half assed". In the spirit of FAST TIMES AS RIDGEMENT HIGH they are most certainly fully assed.
 
how can a right be anything but good? if someone misuses the right that does not tarnish it in the least because we know damn well that in areas where the second amendment does not exist, guns are obtained and used for ill. You are the extremist because you pretend you support the right which is a bald faced lie

Your flushed thread about calling innocent slain children "heroes of the second amendment" was one of the most pathetic threads in terms of dishonesty and trolling I have ever seen on this board in almost 7 years

But that WAS NOT THE QUESTION YOU ANSWERED.
 
I strongly object to those views as being characterized as "half assed". In the spirit of FAST TIMES AS RIDGEMENT HIGH they are most certainly fully assed.
The term both of you are looking for is correct, there is no other term to use. Neither of you know the first thing about this subject and come at the debates with an anti-gun pamphlet view of the subject. That being said both of you are out of your league here and don't have the slightest chance against people who literally have a lifetime of experience with the subject, such as Goshin, TD, myself, and others. The first two having much more knowledge than myself.
 
But that WAS NOT THE QUESTION YOU ANSWERED.


enough of the silly games. Rights are good. especially ones that are as fundamental as the second
 
enough of the silly games. Rights are good. especially ones that are as fundamental as the second
Well TD, you know that when their arguments got dusted, their insufficient knowledge exposed, and their asses handed to them all they have left are silly games.
 
The term both of you are looking for is correct, there is no other term to use. Neither of you know the first thing about this subject and come at the debates with an anti-gun pamphlet view of the subject. That being said both of you are out of your league here and don't have the slightest chance against people who literally have a lifetime of experience with the subject, such as Goshin, TD, myself, and others. The first two having much more knowledge than myself.

Please be a decent chap with enough intellectual and moral integrity - not to mention debating skills - to quote me as being anti-gun owner rights.

btw - Goshin agreed with me earlier today on the subject and I agreed with his post as well. Your list of allies grows thin.
 
enough of the silly games. Rights are good. especially ones that are as fundamental as the second

Your position is your position. If you wish to characterize it as a "silly game" that is on you and nobody else. If you are impotent to defend your own stated position - that is also on you and nobody else and is hardly a "silly game" that anyone is engaged in except yourself.
 
Well TD, you know that when their arguments got dusted, their insufficient knowledge exposed, and their asses handed to them all they have left are silly games.
agreed, the "heroes of the second amendment" was one of the most idiotic things I ever have seen on this board compound by the claim that the originator was pro second amendment. Heck, even thunder napalmed that nonsense
 
Your position is your position. If you wish to characterize it as a "silly game" that is on you and nobody else. If you are impotent to defend your own stated position - that is also on you and nobody else and is hardly a "silly game" that anyone is engaged in except yourself.

Impotent my ass, You are getting filleted like a carp on this subject. You pretend you are second amendment and not one poster-Left right or undetermined believed that fertilizer
 
agreed, the "heroes of the second amendment" was one of the most idiotic things I ever have seen on this board compound by the claim that the originator was pro second amendment. Heck, even thunder napalmed that nonsense

You were impotent then and are impotent now to find one factual thing wrong with any position I took in that thread. I never advocated any laws regarding guns, gun owners, gun rights or the Second Amendment.

Instead of engaging in ad hominem attacks upon me because of your own twisted and false perceptions of my opinions, why don't you have the intellectual integrity to use them in a quote and engage in honest debate?
 
Impotent my ass, You are getting filleted like a carp on this subject. You pretend you are second amendment and not one poster-Left right or undetermined believed that fertilizer

Not one person including you has found a single thing I said that was not factually correct nor any statement against fun rights or the Second Amendment. How is that filleting me like a carp?
 
Please be a decent chap with enough intellectual and moral integrity - not to mention debating skills - to quote me as being anti-gun owner rights.

btw - Goshin agreed with me earlier today on the subject and I agreed with his post as well. Your list of allies grows thin.
A broken clock is right twice a day. Don't read too much into it. For a person who claims to be pro-2nd you sure don't demonstrate a very good grasp of it. If you don't want to be called out bring something better than the hackery I've seen. I don't care what you "think" about the subject, I care about what the more informed know.
 
Not one person including you has found a single thing I said that was not factually correct nor any statement against fun rights or the Second Amendment. How is that filleting me like a carp?
You're right, there wasn't "one" thing you've said that was factually incorrect, it's the entire body of work.
 
A broken clock is right twice a day. Don't read too much into it. For a person who claims to be pro-2nd you sure don't demonstrate a very good grasp of it. If you don't want to be called out bring something better than the hackery I've seen. I don't care what you "think" about the subject, I care about what the more informed know.

You have been utterly impotent to cite one single thing that I have been wrong about regarding the Second Amendment.

Are you now going to rise to the occasion? Or will you continue to engage is silly personal attacks because you wrongly perceive me as the enemy?
 
You have been utterly impotent to cite one single thing that I have been wrong about regarding the Second Amendment.

Are you now going to rise to the occasion? Or will you continue to engage is silly personal attacks because you wrongly perceive me as the enemy?
Don't take things the wrong way. I've been skipping over your posts because I know you are wrong. I just don't feel like dealing with the headache of getting into the dance again. You are wrong.
 
You were impotent then and are impotent now to find one factual thing wrong with any position I took in that thread. I never advocated any laws regarding guns, gun owners, gun rights or the Second Amendment.

Instead of engaging in ad hominem attacks upon me because of your own twisted and false perceptions of my opinions, why don't you have the intellectual integrity to use them in a quote and engage in honest debate?


the dishonesty was the idiotic claim that crime victims are the "heroes" of the second amendment. That claim will rank forever as one of the most putrid ever seen on this board
 
Don't take things the wrong way. I've been skipping over your posts because I know you are wrong. I just don't feel like dealing with the headache of getting into the dance again. You are wrong.

This is amazing watching you continue to post YOU ARE WRONG but are utterly impotent to find one thing that I am factually wrong about. You claim to be such a expert on this topic of the Second Amendment. So go and tell me what I am factually wrong about.

But you have been proven impotent to do so and even now you admit you cannot do it because you do not even have the good sense nor intellectual integrtity to read what you claim you are passing judgment upon. That is a pretty sorry excuse for debate.
 
This is amazing watching you continue to post YOU ARE WRONG but are utterly impotent to find one thing that I am factually wrong about. You claim to be such a expert on this topic of the Second Amendment. So go and tell me what I am factually wrong about.

But you have been proven impotent to do so and even now you admit you cannot do it because you do not even have the good sense nor intellectual integrtity to read what you claim you are passing judgment upon. That is a pretty sorry excuse for debate.


Wrong-lets see

1) claiming to be pro second amendment while trying to saddle upon everyone of us who supports the right, the blood of dead children

2) pretending that our rights are what cost those victims their lives

3) pretending that but for our right TKBA there would be less murders
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom