In reality, neither really, but I'd prefer Obama over Romney. I wouldn't get too worked up if Romney won though.
Why isn't Ron Paul on the list he still may run as a independent, or maybe even a generic other. I will not be voting for either one of these guys.
sadly then you won't really matter when it comes to choosing a president. I suppose there is someone out there who really finds Romney and Obama the same but I find that idiotic
Why isn't Ron Paul on the list he still may run as a independent, or maybe even a generic other. I will not be voting for either one of these guys.
The list was not about the 2012 election or to dismiss those in the current race.In fact ... the republicans are still at a point that anything could happen ... it is only 4 states at this point in time.
It was more just to view which of these two men juxtaposed side by side were viewed more favorably. I was curious after Newt often remarked they are the same candidate.
If I was posting an election poll I would have included Paul. Yes ... I would like to see him run as an independent although at this point it does not seem like something he is seriously considering.
In reality, neither really, but I'd prefer Obama over Romney. I wouldn't get too worked up if Romney won though.
This. They won't do things that change America drastically. But for supreme court nomination, better to have Obama than someone religious any day (not that I think Romney is as religious as Bush II).
This. They won't do things that change America drastically. But for supreme court nomination, better to have Obama than someone religious any day (not that I think Romney is as religious as Bush II).
Over the long term the court swings back and forth, so I don't really think it'll make a huge difference in that department either. And to be fair, there isn't anyone on the court I would say allows religion to dictate his interpretation of the Constitution.
Over the long term the court swings back and forth, so I don't really think it'll make a huge difference in that department either. And to be fair, there isn't anyone on the court I would say allows religion to dictate his interpretation of the Constitution.
I prefer people like Roberts and ALito who understand what the term "shall not be infringed" mean over leftwing feminists who appear to think their duty is to end "paternalist oppression"
Kagan is a joke
I prefer people like Roberts and ALito who understand what the term "shall not be infringed" mean over leftwing feminists who appear to think their duty is to end "paternalist oppression"
Kagan is a joke
Jane Sullivan Roberts' Service to Women
Jane Sullivan Roberts currently serves as legal counsel to Feminists for Life of America (FFLA) on a pro bono basis. From 1995 to 1999 she served as Executive Vice President on the Board of Directors of FFL. Serrin Foster, President of FFL, said, “Jane is a brilliant attorney. We are very proud of her and appreciative of her service to Feminists for Life and women and children.” Ms. Roberts is married to John G. Roberts, Jr.
Its scary, our nation being the worlds military "superpower"..Romney's a slippery bastard and I don't think he stands for anything-- but one of the advantages of not standing for anything is not standing for anything I hate. Romney is never going to apologize for America being the world's sole economic and military superpower..... simply not true...The European union is the world's economic "superpower"..
Yeah, he has his Nobel Prize. For what? What did he do to earn his Nobel Prize?
President Obama has his Nobel Prize ; Romney, nor any of the conservatives will never have one.
Why ??
Humility