• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Would you consider switching parties if...?

What would it take to switch parties in a Federal election?

  • Depends on candidate's view of Religious Right

    Votes: 1 2.8%
  • Depends on candidate's view of Social Programs

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Depends on candidate's view of Tax Structure

    Votes: 1 2.8%
  • Depends on candidate's view of Military

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Depends on candidate's view of Environment

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Depends on candidate's view of World Affairs

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • It would take more than 1 big issue to sway me from my normal vote

    Votes: 17 47.2%
  • I only vote for my party

    Votes: 1 2.8%
  • I don't vote

    Votes: 2 5.6%
  • You left a necessary choice out for me - I'll explain.

    Votes: 14 38.9%

  • Total voters
    36
  • Poll closed .
I vote for whomever I think is best for the job. That said, it's extremely unlikely I could support a Republican presidential candidate. The party has gotten far, far too extreme to have any sort of chance with me. It's frustrating because the Democrats have done plenty to make me mad. For me to vote for another party, honestly, it would have to be a third party that actually has a chance to win.
 
You left out a necessary choice: Hell freezes over.

Every post so far sounds like the beating of the chest of a true independent. I gauge this as not wanting to be called a partisan on a political board. Mostly BS.

Honest enough. Ok, so as "Very Liberal" you'll vote Democrat regardless? Is there anything that could make you jump ship for one candidate? What if a Republican demonstrated him/herself to you to be non-interested in all religious topics - wanted things left as/is or even more liberally (regarding typical religious topics). Or, what if a Republican demonstrated him/herself to be in favor of higher taxes on corporations or the wealthy? Etc. Do you have a reason or 2 that you're "Very Liberal" politically?

For example, I've admitted to being partisan, but also that Obama had been for smaller Federal Government, I would have liked to vote for him as the first black President. So, given specific circumstances, I'd give someone a 4 year chance.
 
I pretty much switch from my party of choice every time there's an election. I vote for moderate conservatives (democrats) instead of any actual progressives. I have the disadvantage of beginning my interest in politics during the Bush era, which pushed left and right wing politics farther away from each other. Both sides are financially on the side of wealthy business interests, so no vote will actually push my position on that, and both sides keep tearing apart our civil rights with illegal surveillance and expansion of power under the pretext of fighting terrorism. But the social ideas between the two parties are so extreme that I couldn't imagine supporting a really right wing candidate. It's hard enough getting a democrat to treat minorities like equal citizens, getting that from a republican seems impossible right now.
 
I vote for whomever I think is best for the job. That said, it's extremely unlikely I could support a Republican presidential candidate. The party has gotten far, far too extreme to have any sort of chance with me. It's frustrating because the Democrats have done plenty to make me mad. For me to vote for another party, honestly, it would have to be a third party that actually has a chance to win.

Thanks, Luna. When you say "far too extreme" - is there an area or 2 that you have in mind? I mean, I'm sure you'd readily admit there are extremists on both sides, but what topic or 2 is your hot button? You say you'd maybe vote 3rd party to jump ship, so is it the establishment in general you don't like (ie: don't trust the individual because of the pressure)?
 
I don't really belong to a party. I vote for who I think is best. I am displeased with the Democrats and how they have led the nation so I am leaning more so towards the Republicans this election cycle. However, if the election is Ron Paul vs. Obama I would vote for Obama.
 
I pretty much switch from my party of choice every time there's an election. I vote for moderate conservatives (democrats) instead of any actual progressives. I have the disadvantage of beginning my interest in politics during the Bush era, which pushed left and right wing politics farther away from each other. Both sides are financially on the side of wealthy business interests, so no vote will actually push my position on that, and both sides keep tearing apart our civil rights with illegal surveillance and expansion of power under the pretext of fighting terrorism. But the social ideas between the two parties are so extreme that I couldn't imagine supporting a really right wing candidate. It's hard enough getting a democrat to treat minorities like equal citizens, getting that from a republican seems impossible right now.

So, Alex, er - I mean, Pashendale - your primary issue is one of Social Equality; Social Programs; or both? Meaning, if a Republican outlined a more progressive social program (and you believed he was sincere and able), then would you vote Republican - or, did I read you wrong?
 
Last edited:
Would you consider voting for someone in a different party than you normally support during a Federal election? If so, what would it take?

I do vote based on Party Line. I'll never vote a Republican into office under any circumstance whatsoever. That is a golden promise.

If for some reason I feel the Democratic candidate is completely incompitent and incapable of holding office, I'll simply opt-out of voting. Which I may do this year in lueu of Obama's 2nd term.
 
Thanks, Luna. When you say "far too extreme" - is there an area or 2 that you have in mind? I mean, I'm sure you'd readily admit there are extremists on both sides, but what topic or 2 is your hot button? You say you'd maybe vote 3rd party to jump ship, so is it the establishment in general you don't like (ie: don't trust the individual because of the pressure)?

I think the Republicans' position on health care is far, far extremist right. Their position is not everyone deserves it. It differs from previous Republicans who supported universal health care, but did so differently than the Democrats would have done it. In the 70s, the Democrats were for single-payer like they have in Canada, but Richard Nixon wanted a combination of a public insurance system coexisting with private insurance companies. It was sensible and would have worked. It was more progressive than the Obama plan that did pass. Nixon wasn't a liberal. He was the arch conservative foe of the left of that era. Now we've gone so far right, even Nixon looks like a liberal. I don't think it's certain Republicans who have gone extreme. I think it's the entire party, as they were opposed to universal health insurance in any way, shape, or form, even a plan that uses no socialism. The entire spectrum has shifted far to the right. The Democrats are the right and the Republicans are the far right, with the only liberal being Dennis Kucinich and the only socialist Bernie Sanders. If you took someone from the conservative party in Canada or England and plopped them into our system, he or she would be considered liberal.

I want the health insurance system that Nixon was for. I don't think that makes me a far leftist. I think that's centrist or slightly right of center, at least it would be measured by our 70s political spectrum. I object to the country moving far, far to the extremist right. I think the climate is as dangerous as that of Germany following World War I.
 
I think the Republicans' position on health care is far, far extremist right. Their position is not everyone deserves it. It differs from previous Republicans who supported universal health care, but did so differently than the Democrats would have done it. In the 70s, the Democrats were for single-payer like they have in Canada, but Richard Nixon wanted a combination of a public insurance system coexisting with private insurance companies. It was sensible and would have worked. It was more progressive than the Obama plan that did pass. Nixon wasn't a liberal. He was the arch conservative foe of the left of that era. Now we've gone so far right, even Nixon looks like a liberal. I don't think it's certain Republicans who have gone extreme. I think it's the entire party, as they were opposed to universal health insurance in any way, shape, or form, even a plan that uses no socialism. The entire spectrum has shifted far to the right. The Democrats are the right and the Republicans are the far right, with the only liberal being Dennis Kucinich and the only socialist Bernie Sanders. If you took someone from the conservative party in Canada or England and plopped them into our system, he or she would be considered liberal.

I want the health insurance system that Nixon was for. I don't think that makes me a far leftist. I think that's centrist or slightly right of center, at least it would be measured by our 70s political spectrum. I object to the country moving far, far to the extremist right. I think the climate is as dangerous as that of Germany following World War I.
What you describe is a big part of why, I believe, so many people are now choosing to not be affiliated with any party whatsoever. They feel pushed out and unrepresented. This leaves only the extremes in charge of the parties, which in turn encourages them to be even more extreme. Nobody's opposing them within the party.

Goes for both parties, but the Reps even more so currently.
 
Ive never voted for a Republican on the federal leve. I have state-wide and locally, where I'm more familiar with the candidates.

I'll vote for Obama again. Although, I'd have been happier if he were more liberal than he has been.

I think Romney isn't as bad as the other Republican candidates, but don't like the flips he's made to appease the Tea Party. I think Rand Paul as President would be a disaster.
 
What you describe is a big part of why, I believe, so many people are now choosing to not be affiliated with any party whatsoever. They feel pushed out and unrepresented. This leaves only the extremes in charge of the parties, which in turn encourages them to be even more extreme. Nobody's opposing them within the party.

Goes for both parties, but the Reps even more so currently.

Which I find interesting, because my lack of a (R) next to my name is because they are NOT EXTREME ENOUGH for my tastes.
 
What you describe is a big part of why, I believe, so many people are now choosing to not be affiliated with any party whatsoever. They feel pushed out and unrepresented. This leaves only the extremes in charge of the parties, which in turn encourages them to be even more extreme. Nobody's opposing them within the party.

Goes for both parties, but the Reps even more so currently.

Absolutely no party out there represents me. The problem with the parties is inherent, they are *ALL* extremist in some fashion. Can't stand the Democrats. Can't stand the Republicans. Detest all the rest of the parties. If I had a legitimate choice, I'd ignore them all.

The problem is, I don't. They all suck.
 
I do vote based on Party Line. I'll never vote a Republican into office under any circumstance whatsoever. That is a golden promise.

If for some reason I feel the Democratic candidate is completely incompitent and incapable of holding office, I'll simply opt-out of voting. Which I may do this year in lueu of Obama's 2nd term.
Ok. And, I see you're a libertarian and "pro-choice on everything". But, the pro-choice label and your pic makes it look like your biggest issue has to do with religious agenda in the right. If a truly non-religious Republican ran, what else would he have to prove to you in the way of issues?
 
I think the Republicans' position on health care is far, far extremist right. Their position is not everyone deserves it. It differs from previous Republicans who supported universal health care, but did so differently than the Democrats would have done it. In the 70s, the Democrats were for single-payer like they have in Canada, but Richard Nixon wanted a combination of a public insurance system coexisting with private insurance companies. It was sensible and would have worked. It was more progressive than the Obama plan that did pass. Nixon wasn't a liberal. He was the arch conservative foe of the left of that era. Now we've gone so far right, even Nixon looks like a liberal. I don't think it's certain Republicans who have gone extreme. I think it's the entire party, as they were opposed to universal health insurance in any way, shape, or form, even a plan that uses no socialism. The entire spectrum has shifted far to the right. The Democrats are the right and the Republicans are the far right, with the only liberal being Dennis Kucinich and the only socialist Bernie Sanders. If you took someone from the conservative party in Canada or England and plopped them into our system, he or she would be considered liberal.

I want the health insurance system that Nixon was for. I don't think that makes me a far leftist. I think that's centrist or slightly right of center, at least it would be measured by our 70s political spectrum. I object to the country moving far, far to the extremist right. I think the climate is as dangerous as that of Germany following World War I.

Is it possible this division is just more evident because all the extremists get so much coverage on the internet and in 24-hour news stations with nothing else to report? I mean, wouldn't the masses still be fairly similar?
 
My party (the Indepedence Party of Minnesota) probably won't endorse anybody for President, so I'm not switching parties either way. If they choose to endorse anybody, I may or may not vote that way. I'd consider their endorsement, but I wouldn't feel bound by it.
 
My party (the Indepedence Party of Minnesota) probably won't endorse anybody for President, so I'm not switching parties either way. If they choose to endorse anybody, I may or may not vote that way. I'd consider their endorsement, but I wouldn't feel bound by it.
Will you vote in the primary or just throw away your vote altogether?
 
Is it possible this division is just more evident because all the extremists get so much coverage on the internet and in 24-hour news stations with nothing else to report? I mean, wouldn't the masses still be fairly similar?

I don't think so. I think the entire Republican Party, at least at the Federal level, is extremist. They were united in their opposition to any form of universal health care whatsoever, even a non-socialist Swiss style system (which they incorrectly branded socialist). I think they have a scorched earth policy of opposing Obama's every move, no matter what it is. I think if Obama saved a child from choking by performing the heimlich, they would find a way to criticize him for it.
 
Which I find interesting, because my lack of a (R) next to my name is because they are NOT EXTREME ENOUGH for my tastes.
:lol: You, Mr Tigger, are hardly representative of the average person.



Absolutely no party out there represents me. The problem with the parties is inherent, they are *ALL* extremist in some fashion. Can't stand the Democrats. Can't stand the Republicans. Detest all the rest of the parties. If I had a legitimate choice, I'd ignore them all.

The problem is, I don't. They all suck.
I tend to agree. They all have become their own version of extreme.
 
Ok. And, I see you're a libertarian and "pro-choice on everything". But, the pro-choice label and your pic makes it look like your biggest issue has to do with religious agenda in the right. If a truly non-religious Republican ran, what else would he have to prove to you in the way of issues?

You make some good observations and yes, my biggest issue is with religion. I hate it more than Hitler hated the Jews. But my position still stands, they could put an Atheist on the bill, and I'd still never vote for him if he was Republican. I am very commited to a complete lack of support for the right.
 
I don't think so. I think the entire Republican Party, at least at the Federal level, is extremist.

Nowhere near extremist enough for some of us.

They were united in their opposition to any form of universal health care whatsoever, even a non-socialist Swiss style system (which they incorrectly branded socialist).

They were united against any form of Universal Health Care, because it's UNCONSTITUTIONAL, regardless of what form it takes.

I think they have a scorched earth policy of opposing Obama's every move, no matter what it is.

As they should, since I haven't actually seen him make any move that is anything other than Liberal/Socialist in nature.
 
You make some good observations and yes, my biggest issue is with religion. I hate it more than Hitler hated the Jews. But my position still stands, they could put an Atheist on the bill, and I'd still never vote for him if he was Republican. I am very commited to a complete lack of support for the right.

I like your avatar. LOL.
 
Nixon wasn't a liberal. He was the arch conservative foe of the left of that era. Now we've gone so far right, even Nixon looks like a liberal. I don't think it's certain Republicans who have gone extreme.

Not really. He was a conservative, but he was always more of a moderate. He just had incendiary commentary for the culture war, Communists, and fellow-travelers.
 
You make some good observations and yes, my biggest issue is with religion. I hate it more than Hitler hated the Jews. But my position still stands, they could put an Atheist on the bill, and I'd still never vote for him if he was Republican. I am very commited to a complete lack of support for the right.

And, as a member of the right, I sincerely thank you for not supporting us.
 
I agree. I will never vote for anyone who would wish to turn this secular nation into a theocracy. Religion and government do not mix.
 
Back
Top Bottom