• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Who is more ridiculous?

Who is more ridiculous?

  • Nancy Pelosi

    Votes: 14 32.6%

  • Sarah Palin

    Votes: 17 39.5%

  • They are both equally ridiculous.

    Votes: 12 27.9%

  • Neither of them are ridiculous.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Total voters
    43
  • Poll closed .
celticwar17

celticwar17

DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 17, 2011
Messages
6,540
Reaction score
2,524
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
nancy-pelosi.jpg Or sarah_palin2.jpg
 
Last edited:
Im not enamored with either...but Pelosi has the edge on nuts
 
They're both insane. Neither belongs anywhere that their particular insanity csn harm others.
 
As far as physical appearance ... despite your cherry picked images both are feminine and attractive. Keep in mind Nancy is 72 years of age. Sarah is mid forties and very pretty no doubt. Your pictures were hyperbole and misrepresent each of them!

Both women in their own way are patriotic and believe they are doing what is best for the United States of America despite their obvious blunders.

They are different types of ridiculous ...

Nancy is probably high IQ and driven albeit very partisan. She has made some good moves and foolish ones.

Sarah is an average to low IQ who enjoys the spotlight and although not well read or versed on issues ... she believes her folksy pov is good for America and she has a charm. She is very athletic and attractive ... she was in over her head and was outwitted quickly.

I will say both parties have many intellectual and phenomenal women as public servants and neither of these women represent their respective parties in the best light.

I can think of so many women in each party I admire ... neither of these women make my list!

Both are marginalized imho ...
 
Last edited:
Palin is more ridiculous, but hot.

Pelosi isn't ridiculous. She's extremely intelligent, which makes her duplicitous traits even more dangerous.
 
the media takes things Palin says and puts their left wing spin on to make it sound like she said something stupid when actually that wasnt the case.......with Nancy however, the media doesnt report or quote things she says because they are some of the most idiotic things to come out of a human beings mouth
 
fishinRod said:
the media takes things Palin says and puts their left wing spin on to make it sound like she said something stupid when actually that wasnt the case.......with Nancy however, the media doesnt report or quote things she says because they are some of the most idiotic things to come out of a human beings mouth
Click to expand...

Well, Palin says plenty of stupid things to begin with without the spin.
 
Dion said:
As far as physical appearance ... despite your cherry picked images both are feminine and attractive. Keep in mind Nancy is 72 years of age. Sarah is mid forties and very pretty no doubt. Your pictures were hyperbole and misrepresent each of them!

Both women in their own way are patriotic and believe they are doing what is best for the United States of America despite their obvious blunders.

They are different types of ridiculous ...

Nancy is probably high IQ and driven albeit very partisan. She has made some good moves and foolish ones.

Sarah is an average to low IQ who enjoys the spotlight and although not well read or versed on issues ... she believes her folksy pov is good for America and she has a charm. She is very athletic and attractive ... she was in over her head and was outwitted quickly.

I will say both parties have many intellectual and phenomenal women as public servants and neither of these women represent their respective parties in the best light.

I can think of so many women in each party I admire ... neither of these women make my list!

Both are marginalized imho ...
Click to expand...
The images are no hyperbole... If it was ... you would have assume I would choose that both are ridiculous... but I actually think one is and o0ne isnt....
I just wanted to throw in some humor and make it bad pictures of both of them to be fair.
 
fishinRod said:
whats your favorite?
Click to expand...

I like when she just left a history refresher about Paul Revere, and then displayed that she was paying zero attention by saying he rang bells, shot his gun, and warned the British we were coming. Then, when given the chance to say it was a gaffe, she defended it on TV by rewriting history (as usual). Or actually when she said she has foreign policy experience because she lived near Russia. But my all time favorite? Right here:

 
no vote
Note that the more intelligent woman is a liberal.
Why is this ?
 
Dion said:
As far as physical appearance ... despite your cherry picked images both are feminine and attractive. Keep in mind Nancy is 72 years of age. Sarah is mid forties and very pretty no doubt. Your pictures were hyperbole and misrepresent each of them!

Both women in their own way are patriotic and believe they are doing what is best for the United States of America despite their obvious blunders.

They are different types of ridiculous ...

Nancy is probably high IQ and driven albeit very partisan. She has made some good moves and foolish ones.

Sarah is an average to low IQ who enjoys the spotlight and although not well read or versed on issues ... she believes her folksy pov is good for America and she has a charm. She is very athletic and attractive ... she was in over her head and was outwitted quickly.

I will say both parties have many intellectual and phenomenal women as public servants and neither of these women represent their respective parties in the best light.

I can think of so many women in each party I admire ... neither of these women make my list!

Both are marginalized imho ...
Click to expand...
\

lol nancy has had many thousands of dollars in plasticology put her near a heat source and her face will melt along with joan rivers
 
Nancy Pelosi.
 
Sarah Palin obviously.
 
Palin makes Herman Cain look like a Rhodes Scholar.
 
Both are horrible for the nation. Palin is crafty, devious and very much part of the machine that is destroying America. Palin is simply stupid. Neither one wins in my opinion.
 
I voted for Palin. I think Pelosi has more disciple than Palin, and she handles pressure better. I think Palin became governor and VP because she was simply in the right place, at the right time.
 
fishinRod said:
the media takes things Palin says and puts their left wing spin on to make it sound like she said something stupid when actually that wasnt the case.......with Nancy however, the media doesnt report or quote things she says because they are some of the most idiotic things to come out of a human beings mouth
Click to expand...

Oh be serious now... Palin says plenty of stupid things without any spin needed.
 
About as ridiculous as the question.
 
It's a slam dunk that Palin is ridiculous. She's shown definite Republican bonafides by profiting handsomely at our expense. Ya' gotta admire her money making talents and give her a pat on the back for capitalizing on an unusual opportunity. Republicans love to maintain the "perception" that she is a qualified candidate. Ain't it grand?
 
Nancy Pelosi:

Has an entire website that explains that the commerce clause gives the federal government complete control over commerce. Which perhaps the dumbest thing you could believe.

Fact: It allows to settle trade disputes among states. It does not give the fed control over commerce. Saying it does is perhaps the dumbest thing you can manage as it goes against the entire purpose of the balance of powers of the states and fed.

Sarah Palin:

"As Putin rears his head and comes into the air space of the United States of America, where– where do they go? It's Alaska. It's just right over the border." --Sarah Palin. She was explaining how Alaska's proximity to Russia gave her foreign policy experience. I don't think I have to go into how that is retarded.

Both seem pretty ridiculous to me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom