- Joined
- Jun 7, 2011
- Messages
- 1,405
- Reaction score
- 355
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
My friend at another forum brought this up
Would it be better if there wasn't an audience at these debates? See how there position comes out without a applause or boo. No "oooowww, no he didn't" meaninglessness instigation or the applaud "oh, he is probably correct" when watching on tv.
Has such a debate happen and do you think this is worth experimenting?
(an* on poll)
This is why I haven't watched the debates. They REALLY need to get rid of the audience. There doesn't need to be an audience at Presidential debates. Why? Because it loses the purpose. Instead of saying logical and sound things, they just try to gain a round of applause from the audience. Unfortunately, there's psychological advantages with that. As soon as an audience claps, most people automatically think what was said was a good thing. OR, people don't even hear what was initially said.
Would it be better if there wasn't an audience at these debates? See how there position comes out without a applause or boo. No "oooowww, no he didn't" meaninglessness instigation or the applaud "oh, he is probably correct" when watching on tv.
Has such a debate happen and do you think this is worth experimenting?
(an* on poll)
Last edited: