pdog
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2011
- Messages
- 1,969
- Reaction score
- 1,226
- Location
- Searching for answers.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Re: Should someone who earns $1 billion a year be taxed more than someone who makes $
Get a clue. Despite his cherry picking of 1 out of a half dozen arguments from my original post, my first response is a direct response to both his first and second statement. I didn't ignore or sidestep his point at all. Strawman, my ...
My second was an attempt at the tactic used by so many others here - to skate the burden of proof by asking another question. Myself, and probably a lot of others are tired, tired of posting long thought out arguments only to have somebody ignore all but 1% to make an over simplified argument.
And you want to say marginal income isn't relevant in an argument about fair share? I'm sorry but to call 20% of income made by doing absolutely nothing (interest) is the "same" or "more" as 20% of an hourly wage is a gross oversimplification of our world. If you truly believe that you are 100% in control of your own destiny then I have no chance of convincing you otherwise. But if you're a realist and understand the chaos involved of every outcome of the real world, then you'd also understand that the value of a buck varies from individual to individual.
If I'm wrong and this is about straight up value, then why is the counter answer to progressive taxes not a flat dollar amount instead of a flat rate. How about every american should pay $10K to be a citizen.
I think you like strawmen more than Frank Baum. Marginal income has absolutely no basis in this argument.
Get a clue. Despite his cherry picking of 1 out of a half dozen arguments from my original post, my first response is a direct response to both his first and second statement. I didn't ignore or sidestep his point at all. Strawman, my ...
My second was an attempt at the tactic used by so many others here - to skate the burden of proof by asking another question. Myself, and probably a lot of others are tired, tired of posting long thought out arguments only to have somebody ignore all but 1% to make an over simplified argument.
And you want to say marginal income isn't relevant in an argument about fair share? I'm sorry but to call 20% of income made by doing absolutely nothing (interest) is the "same" or "more" as 20% of an hourly wage is a gross oversimplification of our world. If you truly believe that you are 100% in control of your own destiny then I have no chance of convincing you otherwise. But if you're a realist and understand the chaos involved of every outcome of the real world, then you'd also understand that the value of a buck varies from individual to individual.
If I'm wrong and this is about straight up value, then why is the counter answer to progressive taxes not a flat dollar amount instead of a flat rate. How about every american should pay $10K to be a citizen.