• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

How long will you "blame Bush"?

How long will you blame Bush

  • Less than one more year

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Until this term is over

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    32
Status
Not open for further replies.
Moderator's Warning:
Any discussions of threats or problems between members ceases now. If you are having any issues with another member, report the post, or PM a moderator.
 
strawman. I am talking about clinton's performance and how it lead to 9-11. terror attacks under bush is another topic, one which i will be glad to discuss with you at another time.
Say what??? You said compare the number of terrorist attacks while Bush was president with the number of attacks while Clinton was president.

In which neighborhood in Crazytown is it a "strawman" to answer your question by showing there were more terrorist attacks while Bush was president than there were while Clinton was president?
 
Say what??? You said compare the number of terrorist attacks while Bush was president with the number of attacks while Clinton was president.

In which neighborhood in Crazytown is it a "strawman" to answer your question by showing there were more terrorist attacks while Bush was president than there were while Clinton was president?

in the world where "strawman argument" has been redefined to have a different meaning.
 
I do not think there is any case that can possibly be plausibly made, that, had Clintons' term somehow extended another year, that with him still as President, that the 9/11 attacks would not have taken place exactly the same way they did with Bush as President.
Of course there is a case. We know this because it happened. While Clinton was president, he too received a PDB warning of a potential attack inside the U.S., only unlike Bush who did absolutely nothing in response to his PDB, Clinton took action. The same day Clinton read a warning that Al-Qaeada was planning an attack inside America, he took action leading to airport security being raised at suspected airports until the threat passed.

Clinton responds to a warning, results in zero planes hijacked ... zero people killed ... zero buildings bombed ... no attack.

Bush ignores warnings -- results in 4 planes hijacked in under 2 hours ... 3,000 people killed ... 3 buildings destroyed ... worst terrorist attack in history.
 
I do not think there is any case that can possibly be plausibly made, that, had Clintons' term somehow extended another year, that with him still as President, that the 9/11 attacks would not have taken place exactly the same way they did with Bush as President. Clinton's administration, in spite of the warning in 1993, had done nothing of any value to prevent such an attack.

Of course there is a case. We know this because it happened. While Clinton was president, he too received a PDB warning of a potential attack inside the U.S., only unlike Bush who did absolutely nothing in response to his PDB, Clinton took action. The same day Clinton read a warning that Al-Qaeada was planning an attack inside America, he took action leading to airport security being raised at suspected airports until the threat passed.

Clinton responds to a warning, results in zero planes hijacked ... zero people killed ... zero buildings bombed ... no attack.

Bush ignores warnings -- results in 4 planes hijacked in under 2 hours ... 3,000 people killed ... 3 buildings destroyed ... worst terrorist attack in history.

OK, I'll concede on this point. There is indeed a case to be made that 9/11 wouldn't have happened if Clinton was still present, if one accepts the premise that such a case is allowed to be made by just making stuff up out of thin air, with no documentation or support to prove that it has any basis in truth.
 
..While Clinton was president, he too received a PDB warning of a potential attack inside the U.S., only unlike Bush who did absolutely nothing in response to his PDB, Clinton took action. The same day Clinton read a warning that Al-Qaeada was planning an attack inside America, he took action leading to airport security being raised at suspected airports until the threat passed.

Clinton responds to a warning, results in zero planes hijacked ... zero people killed ... zero buildings bombed ... no attack.

Bush ignores warnings -- results in 4 planes hijacked in under 2 hours ... 3,000 people killed ... 3 buildings destroyed ... worst terrorist attack in history.

indeed. very sad & pathetic huh?
 
indeed. very sad & pathetic huh?
And on top of that, W ordered the bombing of the levees in New Orleans during the midst of Hurricane Katrina. He may have also ordered large quantities of high explosives to be buried deep beneath the ocean floor off the coast of Malaysia resulting in one of the worst Tsunami disasters in modern history. We can't forget his role in the Kennedy assassination as well. Geez! How'd this guy ever get elected in the first place with such an ominous rap sheet? :thinking
 
OK, I'll concede on this point. There is indeed a case to be made that 9/11 wouldn't have happened if Clinton was still present, if one accepts the premise that such a case is allowed to be made by just making stuff up out of thin air, with no documentation or support to prove that it has any basis in truth.
What is it you believe was made up out of thin air?
 
And on top of that, W ordered the bombing of the levees in New Orleans during the midst of Hurricane Katrina. He may have also ordered large quantities of high explosives to be buried deep beneath the ocean floor off the coast of Malaysia resulting in one of the worst Tsunami disasters in modern history. We can't forget his role in the Kennedy assassination as well....

I think you have posted in the wrong section.
 
No, not at all. I am simply adding to the long list of infractions for which we must hold Bush 43 accountable. :shrug:
You go right ahead and blame Bush for whatever you feel like holding him accountable for.
 
Last edited:
History will record that GWSpongeForBrains caused the Great GWSpongeForBrains Depression so I guess he will be blamed forever. That would be logical.. Must have been Cheney that bombed the levees, GWSnotForBrains was in the crapper reading his daily update "The Flintstones."
 
Two of the worst tragedies in American history happened under Shrub's watch:

9-11

the mortgage collapse
 
History will record that GWSpongeForBrains caused the Great GWSpongeForBrains Depression so I guess he will be blamed forever. That would be logical.. Must have been Cheney that bombed the levees, GWSnotForBrains was in the crapper reading his daily update "The Flintstones."

sponge for brains? interesting claim.
 
Two of the worst tragedies in American history happened under Shrub's watch:

9-11

the mortgage collapse

Both tragedies were developed under Clinton
 
Both tragedies were developed under Clinton


911 was certainly caused by clinton doing absolutely nothing in response to repeated attacks by alqueda and other terrorists...the first WTT attack happened under clinton....the USS cole...the african embassy...the 200 marines killed in the Riad barracks attack...and on and on....
 
911 was certainly caused by clinton doing absolutely nothing in response to repeated attacks by alqueda and other terrorists...

this is 100% untrue, as I have shown in this thread with evidence.


...the first WTC attack happened under clinton...

yeah, like a month after he was sworn in. you really gonna blame him for that????????????
 
this is 100% untrue, as I have shown in this thread with evidence.




yeah, like a month after he was sworn in. you really gonna blame him for that????????????

your evidence has proved no such thing
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom