Says who? How is it that the child is not effected by his parents neglect?
says me and dont play word games with me and appeal to emotion it wont work LMAO
neglect? really because some dad beat dad giving his $200 dollars a month, when he actually does it, but never does anything else is the opposite of neglect???
give me a break, like I said this is about REALITY and TRYING to force a person to pay money every month that has no want to be a parent does just about NOTHING for the kid. Thats the reality. and thats why you point is moot because it doesnt have and substantial effect.
It is not. The op argued that abortion gave some right to women that was not enjoyed by men. That is not true. Men enjoy the same right to control their own body. A man's control over his reproductive acts and his part in human reproduction ends when he plants his seed. A woman's clearly does not end at that point. You cant change a fact of biology via the law.
yes it is nonsense and dishonesty, its just like the morons that say gays have the same rights as straight because they too can merry whoever they want if its the opposite sex, its stupid and dishonest.
Nobody is trying to change biology the objective people are just trying to use reality.
Nobody wants to fore women to give birth but the fact remains they can get abortions with or without the guys say (THE WAY IT SHOULD BE) but the laws dont reflect that and make it fair and equal.
So yes saying a guy is free to get an abortion if a doctor will do it is in reality, nonsense. lol
Human beings have a long childhood and require a large amount of care in childhood. The state has some duty to ensure that their welfare is protected but the burden of care can only justly fall on the parents. Fathers should not be allowed to deny their responsibility to help care for the child.
1. BOTH PARENTS CAN ALREADY DO THIS by adoption or god forbid just barely care for the kid or worse abuse it
2. ON PARENT can avoid this by getting an abortion but if she choices not to it FORCES the guy. Her CHOICE, FORCES the guy and thats the issue. Meanwhile his choices dont matter.
this is the hear of the debate and why it needs fixed.
TRYING to force a person to give child support that doesnt want to be a parent fixes little to nothing LOL
the rights of the man and women must be as close to equal as possible, currently they are not, the are bias, unfair and discriminative.
If the law is changed that the man can agree to give up all rights to the kid in the same time frame as the women must decide if she wants to abort that would be more fair and just. And the welfare of the child would be impacted just about NIL for obvious reasons.
The opposite option should also exist but Im sure would be much more unlikely. The women could also agree not to abort if she chooses but give up the child to the man.