- Joined
- Oct 31, 2010
- Messages
- 18,536
- Reaction score
- 2,438
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
I think it's a fair question. Based on my years debating, whenever a user posts sources, the other users are usually never persuaded. It may persuade a few viewers, but typically, if you watch closely, you'll discern a general pattern when a source is posted. It's either ignored entirely, questioned, or countered with another source until both users get frustrated.
I'm currently amassing a written notebook of multiple credible sources, organized by issues(general arguments and counters are listed as well).
Basically, is it worth it if it virtually never persuades the opponent?
I'm currently amassing a written notebook of multiple credible sources, organized by issues(general arguments and counters are listed as well).
Basically, is it worth it if it virtually never persuades the opponent?
Last edited: