• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Do You Want Higher Taxes?

Why should anyone be forced to pay more taxes while we waste in on things such as..


#1 A total of $3 million has been granted to researchers at the University of California at Irvine so that they can play video games such as World of Warcraft. The goal of this “video game research” is reportedly to study how “emerging forms of communication, including multiplayer computer games and online virtual worlds such as World of Warcraft and Second Life can help organizations collaborate and compete more effectively in the global marketplace.”

#2 The U.S. Department of Agriculture gave the University of New Hampshire $700,000 this year to study methane gas emissions from dairy cows.

#3 $615,000 was given to the University of California at Santa Cruz to digitize photos, T-shirts and concert tickets belonging to the Grateful Dead.

#4 A professor at Stanford University received $239,100 to study how Americans use the Internet to find love. So far one of the key findings of this “research” is that the Internet is a safer and more discreet way to find same-sex partners.

#5 The National Science Foundation spent $216,000 to study whether or not politicians “gain or lose support by taking ambiguous positions.”

#6 The National Institutes of Health spent approximately $442,340 to study the behavior of male prostitutes in Vietnam.

#7 Approximately $1 million of U.S. taxpayer money was used to create poetry for the Little Rock, New Orleans, Milwaukee and Chicago zoos. The goal of the “poetry” is to help raise awareness on environmental issues.

#8 The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs spent $175 million during 2010 to maintain hundreds of buildings that it does not even use. This includes a pink, octagonal monkey house in the city of Dayton, Ohio.

#9 $1.8 million of U.S. taxpayer dollars went for a “museum of neon signs” in Las Vegas, Nevada.

#10 $35 million was reportedly paid out by Medicare to 118 “phantom” medical clinics that never even existed. Apparently these “phantom” medical clinics were established by a network of criminal gangs as a way to defraud the U.S. government.

#11 The Conservation Commission of Monkton, Vermont got $150,000 from the federal government to construct a “critter crossing”. Thanks to U.S. government money, the lives of “thousands” of migrating salamanders are now being saved.

#12 In California, one park received $440,000 in federal funds to perform “green energy upgrades” on a building that has not been used for a decade.

#13 $440,955 was spent this past year on an office for former Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert that he rarely even visits.

#14 One Tennessee library was given $5,000 in federal funds to host a series of video game parties.

#15 The U.S. Census Bureau spent $2.5 million on a television commercial during the Super Bowl that was so poorly produced that virtually nobody understood what is was trying to say.

#16 A professor at Dartmouth University received $137,530 to create a “recession-themed” video game entitled “Layoff”.

#17 The National Science Foundation gave the Minnesota Zoo over $600,000 so that they could develop an online video game called “Wolfquest”.

#18 A pizzeria in Iowa was given $60,000 to renovate the pizzeria’s facade and give it a more “inviting feel”.

#19 The U.S. Department of Agriculture gave one enterprising group of farmers $30,000 to develop a tourist-friendly database of farms that host guests for overnight “haycations”. This one sounds like something that Dwight Schrute would have dreamed up.

#20 Almost unbelievably, the National Institutes of Health was given $800,000 in “stimulus funds” to study the impact of a “genital-washing program” on men in South Africa.

Prison Planet.com » Government Waste: 20 Of The Craziest Things That The U.S. Government Is Spending Money On


How is it right to tax persons more only to waste it in areas the government has no business to be involved?
 
Why should anyone be forced to pay more taxes while we waste in on things such as..





Prison Planet.com » Government Waste: 20 Of The Craziest Things That The U.S. Government Is Spending Money On


How is it right to tax persons more only to waste it in areas the government has no business to be involved?

great point-

I believe the burden is on the government to come up with massive spending cuts to show good faith before anyone's taxes are raised. especially on those who are tasked with paying most of the federal income taxes and all the federal death taxes.
 
I believe the burden is on the government to come up with massive spending cuts to show good faith before anyone's taxes are raised

I think there's something we can finally agree on :)
 
I believe the burden is on the government to come up with massive spending cuts to show good faith before anyone's taxes are raised. especially on those who are tasked with paying most of the federal income taxes and all the federal death taxes.

been there...done that.

GOP refuses to play ball.
 
Dems have a plan that cuts spending and removes tax-loopholes.

let me know when the GOP agrees to work with that plan.

dems want to raise taxes on those who pay too much of the income tax

that's a non-starter

why cannot the dems agree to spending cuts without trying to derail them with tax hikes

do the dems believe that EVERY PENNY OF GOVERNMENT SPENDING IS GOOD AND PROPER?

that is the only possible argument they have for getting tax hikes as a concession to cutting spending
 
And India is a socialist nation which is growing faster than we are

The GLF was communism. It would help if you understood what the words you use really mean

Obviously India is growing faster than the US. The US still has a greater GDP. US is 1st, India is 10th. India also doesn't make the top 100 when it comes to GDP per capita. US is in the top 10.

Before you can have communism, you must have socialism, or so it says in Marxist doctrine. If you want to debate the Great Leap Forward, I have no problem with that/ However, I prefer you give me reasons for such a conclusion instead of insulting me.
 
But you still can't post an example of a free market economy lifting its' people out of poverty

Hong Kong is probably the closest to a current free market. US, Germany, Sweden, etc are largely free market economies. They are becoming more and more regulated, but are largely based on free markets. And India is definitely more capitalist than socialist right now.
 
why cannot the dems agree to spending cuts without trying to derail them with tax hikes

They already made concessions to get the spending cuts with the Republicans. They're just also looking to close tax loopholes. It seems more to me in this situation that the Repubs more than the Dems are playing the "have my cake and eat it too" game.
 
Not exactly what I said.

If someone holds almost nothing in the company why should they have a great sway in the company? Why shouldn't they be the cricket in the room? If they hold a sufficient holdings in the company they have sufficient say. I'm not seeing the problem.

No you're changing from "sway anything" to "great sway". Your change is obvious, and your motive transparent
 
Last edited:
That is how it should be in some cases. As long as this corporation is doing nothing illegal, it's really non of the governments business how big it's ego gets.

So what the law says is legal is none of the govts' business :roll:
 
This is very much like claiming that the U.S. is not a capitalist country because it isn't purely capitalist. Same with China and India. Both certainly have capitalist aspects to them.

As I said earlier, there are no true isms.

And that's what I have been saying. That's why it's truly absurd for the wingnuts to use China and India as examples of "free markets"
 
I've argued for regulations. I noted where it is frustrating that the govenment would pass Sarbanes/Oxley and then completely ignore it. There is no reason that the government should set what a CEO should get paid though. (as long as they are not bailing them out) which is wrong in the first place and not something they seem to want to do anyway.

There's more to the obscene bonuses and salary the rich are getting. We don't have to pass a law limiting pay; just pass a law so that the corporate committees that decide the pay and bonuses aren't loaded with the executives friends.
 
great point-

I believe the burden is on the government to come up with massive spending cuts to show good faith before anyone's taxes are raised. especially on those who are tasked with paying most of the federal income taxes and all the federal death taxes.

The burden is on the people, who are soveriegn. They decide how our tax moneys are to be spent.
 
There's more to the obscene bonuses and salary the rich are getting. We don't have to pass a law limiting pay; just pass a law so that the corporate committees that decide the pay and bonuses aren't loaded with the executives friends.

where does the federal government get the power to do that? let me guess "general welfare clause?
 
The burden is on the people, who are soveriegn. They decide how our tax moneys are to be spent.


reality seems to be absent from that point
 
dems want to raise taxes on those who pay too much of the income tax

that's a non-starter

why cannot the dems agree to spending cuts without trying to derail them with tax hikes

do the dems believe that EVERY PENNY OF GOVERNMENT SPENDING IS GOOD AND PROPER?

that is the only possible argument they have for getting tax hikes as a concession to cutting spending

dems want to raise taxes on those who pay too little of the income tax

that's a non-starter for the corporate appologists on the right

The dems have agreed to spending cuts far larger than the repukes are willing to swallow
 
Obviously India is growing faster than the US. The US still has a greater GDP. US is 1st, India is 10th. India also doesn't make the top 100 when it comes to GDP per capita. US is in the top 10.

Before you can have communism, you must have socialism, or so it says in Marxist doctrine. If you want to debate the Great Leap Forward, I have no problem with that/ However, I prefer you give me reasons for such a conclusion instead of insulting me.

We're still waiting for you to come up with an example of the free market lifting a people out of poverty.
 
Hong Kong is probably the closest to a current free market. US, Germany, Sweden, etc are largely free market economies. They are becoming more and more regulated, but are largely based on free markets. And India is definitely more capitalist than socialist right now.

Hong Kong is not a free market, not by any stretch of the imagination

Let us know when you can come up with an example of a free market that has lifted its' people up from poverty. "Closest to a free market" does not mean "A free market"
 
dems want to raise taxes on those who pay too little of the income tax

that's a non-starter for the corporate appologists on the right

The dems have agreed to spending cuts far larger than the repukes are willing to swallow

another one of the 100 or so lies you have posted

the top 2 percent are paying more income tax than any other group of the similar number of people so you are completely totally and thoroughly dishonest

and your juvenile attempts to copy my posts and respam them is childish
 
Back
Top Bottom