• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Do the results of the market have a moral quality?

Do the results of the market have a moral quality?

  • I am conservative and I am not sure

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I am conservative and I think they do not

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I am liberal and I am not sure

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I am libertarian and I think they do

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I am libertarian and I am not sure

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I am libertarian and I think they do not

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    6

Slartibartfast

Jesus loves you.
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
71,966
Reaction score
58,547
Location
NE Ohio
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
In other words, success, failure, being rich, being poor, being middle class, enough resources for all, or enough for some. In general, are the results of the free market moral?
 
Morality, social justice, and all other similar ideas have no part in the market and they shouldn't.
 
How one implements and runs a free market is where morality comes in. The freemarket, in itself, has nothing to do directly with morality. However, I think it’s the best general market philosophy for supporting a moral society if regulated. Note, all types markets are regulated; sometimes to benefit a few or to benefit as many as possible. Sorry, I have no way to answer your poll given the options.
 
How one implements and runs a free market is where morality comes in. The freemarket, in itself, has nothing to do directly with morality. However, I think it’s the best general market philosophy for supporting a moral society if regulated. Note, all types markets are regulated; sometimes to benefit a few or to benefit as many as possible. Sorry, I have no way to answer your poll given the options.

I agree, that is a problem with my question. I was unable to come up with a way to make the question more specific, so this was the best I could come up with. But I think that is ok, because often if you leave things undefined, the answers become more interesting.
 
The market is amoral
 
Markets have results.
It's up to individual interpretation, on whether or not, they are moral.

Unfortunately, this is true. Morality is subjective, and the market often works in favor of the greedy. Whether or not that is immoral is up to individual interpretation.
 
In other words, success, failure, being rich, being poor, being middle class, enough resources for all, or enough for some. In general, are the results of the free market moral?

Never absolutely, and the degree depends on socio-cultural conditions.

Morality, social justice, and all other similar ideas have no part in the market and they shouldn't.

I have a hard time believing morality and justice have no bearing on the management of society's resources.
 
Last edited:
Market types and morality types interact with each other, but are independent features of a culture. Both develop recursively over time. But again there is no exact one to one relationship. This seems like nit picking, but if you don’t keep them separated in your thinking errors as to causality can be made.
 
In other words, success, failure, being rich, being poor, being middle class, enough resources for all, or enough for some. In general, are the results of the free market moral?

ultimately we are compensated based on how well we serve others. I would say that trends towards moral net results.
 
In other words, success, failure, being rich, being poor, being middle class, enough resources for all, or enough for some. In general, are the results of the free market moral?

Do they have to be?
 
ultimately we are compensated based on how well we serve others. I would say that trends towards moral net results.

I think manipulation is a stronger influence in contemporary capitalism than service.

My father was just commenting on how quality standards in the service industry have plummeted since he was young, because public reliance on those services is compelling enough that providers have very little incentive to strain themselves or their wallets providing a positive experience, as opposed to a necessary one.

There was a time in the United States where providing a good product or service in-and-of-itself was as important in value to a producer/service provider as making a profit, because the two were seen as one in the same; the one who provided a better service always and ought to win. The contemporary global/telecommuting financial apparatus does not share that old value.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom