I agree and he did pay for that, perhaps not with his death but he sons death was payment due. That said, we must remember that we we must make our enemies into monsters so that killing them will be a lot easier and moral. Libya and the U.S. have what in similarity and or common interest, none that is and so I ask why are we attacking this country.
Show me where in the constitution does this give us the authority to do so currently and perhaps I will go along with your idea. What right to we have to befriend Gadaffi and then defriend him only to friend him again and then declare him a terrorist, so which is going to be and and what will be the price. Now if we want war then lets declare it, all or nothing this endless limited campaigns we find ourselves in is becoming very expensive both in blood and money, we are broke as a country. If this is the case then we have a lot of leaders to eliminate, so where to we begin and then where to we stop.
That I understand, but what constitutional right do we have to interfere with Libya's internal affairs. Now under the template we currently operate under we have a lot of attacking to do. Now remember that Russia order the Korea airliner to be shot down, so under the current template we need to attack Russia, we also need to attack N. Korea not to mention Pakistan. This country has been at war for better than 10 years and at what cost and we still haven't achieved our victory goal. Now if it is all out war we want then let those go before congress and declare it.
me and my crack had nothing to do with it.
I know just piggy backing on your post.
It did and we killed his kid and bombed his palace, debt paid perhaps not in full. What we really should have done is declared war and attacked Libya and defeated him in a more complete method.
That is why I voted no, in one time or another I suppose all countries have been a terrorist in one form or another.