• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Are Al Sharpton, Jeremiah Wright, Farrakan, and Malik Shabbaz... Racists?

Are they Racists?


  • Total voters
    25
LMAO nobody is trolling nice deflect but Im not doing anything of the sory except exposing your flawed examples/logic.

You are crying with your examples saying "its unfair" and acting like those retards that judged you set the standard when they dont.

And yes I agree the you are discussing hypocrisy and you are an example of it. You are giving examples of what was done to you and you think its wrong but yet turned around and did the same thing. You want to judge things because "hey it was done to me"

You made blanket statements like everyone feels the way those idiots that judged you do but thats not true.

This may not be what you intended to do but its what you did.

Can you show me where I judged something in this thread?
 
And at least you are applying the same standard you apply to whites of comparable caliber to these folks.
Its commendable.

more blanket statements that get you in trouble. How do you know that everybody else here isnt doing the same?

oh thats right because if they dont agree with you they must not be or you can read everyones mind LMAO

and save me some emotional filled deflection with cussing or name calling just answer the question like a man.

HOW DO YOU KNOW THAT OTHERS HERE DIDNT DO WHAT YOU THINK THIS POSTER DID?

answer honestly, if you have any other answer beside admitting you dont, you are dishonest or lack the understanding of reality or both
 
Can you show me where I judged something in this thread?

easy go to the post where you replied to mine, where you THINK im being partial to al by calling him knee jerk but if a white guy did it it would be racist.

After that go to post 123 where you asumed what you think that poster did others in this thread did not. (judge equally)

any other questions? LMAO
 
easy go to the post where you replied to mine, where you THINK im being partial to al by calling him knee jerk but if a white guy did it it would be racist.

After that go to post 123 where you asumed what you think that poster did others in this thread did not. (judge equally)

any other questions? LMAO

I didn't state that I believed what you think.
Your message of use of the term knee jerk about "white culture" reminded me of more examples of how unequal people apply the term racist... thats all it was........ I was just replying to it because I saw the term and it reminded me of another way the term is applied unequally.


Post 123 the guy stated that he believed the question to be racist, right after saying the people mentioned in the poll weren't.
Apparently you missed that part.......
 
more blanket statements that get you in trouble. How do you know that everybody else here isnt doing the same?

oh thats right because if they dont agree with you they must not be or you can read everyones mind LMAO

and save me some emotional filled deflection with cussing or name calling just answer the question like a man.

HOW DO YOU KNOW THAT OTHERS HERE DIDNT DO WHAT YOU THINK THIS POSTER DID?

answer honestly, if you have any other answer beside admitting you dont, you are dishonest or lack the understanding of reality or both

Because I know how Kali feels about racism in general. I know this specifically.

I also know others on this board are not going to apply the standard equally.




So you always assume that because I make a point piggy backing off of someone else's post that I am instantly accusing them of something?
 
I really do think Al Sharpton has some race issues to get over, but I wouldn't call him racist.

I used to think that but he has changed over the years and the thing about Al? He is not only racist he is a leech that latches on to anything just to make money. I used to think he meant well but woke up to the fact that he is a media whore only out to make a buck. He does not give a crap about black plight as if he did? He would still be trying to make changes in hoods where he gets no press. He latches onto any "black" thing in the press and cries racism when there may not be any there. He used to be cool but he has turned into a person that comes off as hating those that are not black.
 
Because I know how Kali feels about racism in general. I know this specifically.

I also know others on this board are not going to apply the standard equally.



So you always assume that because I make a point piggy backing off of someone else's post that I am instantly accusing them of something?


thanks I have all I need now, that fact that you couldnt answer honestly gives me all the info I need. No real need discussing it futher with thoose type of blanket assumptions.

Like I said dont let the idiots set the standard, be better than them. You let the retards set the standards and it pulls everyone down.

Those guys that accused you of being racists for non liking hip hop and basketball have serious issues and are part of the problem, they dont matter so not let them. The irony and hypocrisy in their thinking is so backwards you could probably argue them mentally retarded, or at least socially :D

Be better than them dont let them pollute you.
 
I used to think that but he has changed over the years and the thing about Al? He is not only racist he is a leech that latches on to anything just to make money. I used to think he meant well but woke up to the fact that he is a media whore only out to make a buck. He does not give a crap about black plight as if he did? He would still be trying to make changes in hoods where he gets no press. He latches onto any "black" thing in the press and cries racism when there may not be any there. He used to be cool but he has turned into a person that comes off as hating those that are not black.

thats how I view him but I use the term media mutt :D
 
Racism implies unreasonable or unwarranted action to promote one race over another. Trying to overcome past injustice does not qualify. I do not think these men are racist. I think they are overzealous at times, and sometimes look for conflict where none exists, but I criticize their methods, not their intent. Minorities, especially black people, still face a lot of discrimination in this country.

maybe where u live but here not happenin, it's the other way around.
 
You obviously have no understanding of what racism is which is ironic since conservatives are always bitching about liberals pulling the racism trigger to often. Accusing the U.S. government of "genocide" does not indicate the blacks are superior to whites. It's a conspiracy theory that comes from legitimate distrust in the U.S. government. When you remember things like this Tuskegee syphilis experiment - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia when the U.S. government purposely kept blacks ignorant of having syphilis and watched them die and pass it on to their children just for government experiments, it becomes easier to understand. In other words, it's legitimate distrust in the government intensified.



You also neglect to understand that he blames the GOVERNMENT, not the white race.

claiming one race is capable of genocide implies that race is inferior = racism
the US govt is and has been predominantly white (particularly when AIDS first came out), ie he is blaming "the man"

buy a clue. your bending over backwards to defend these turds shows just what a hack you really are.
 
Another black person, anymore??

the point is, contrary to crybaby, pants pissing, hand-wringing, liberal belief, black people can be racist too.
 
No, that's not at all what I said. I said it's ok, IMO, for them to be racist because they were themselvs victims of racism. Turnabout is fair play.

so then it becomes OK for whites to be racist against them because of their racism. afterall....turnabout is fair play
 
wheres the "racism" meaning where does he condemn ALL WHITES in this case for it to be RACISM?

so, using that logic, I can call one black man the dreaded "N" word and not be a racist...as long as I don't say all blacks are the "N" word.
 
Maybe I'm missing something but I don't see where it matters to me personally. Give me any race or religion or nationality and I'll give you racists, zealots and self aggrandizing buttheads. Why is it that I need to spend my time trying to define and categorize any of them?

I'm not black, but I have to ask what is the purpose of the OP? Why is it that a white guy starts a thread asking addressing the intent of selected black leaders? It is my opinion that the question itself is racist.

using the logic of the defenders in this thread, how is the question racist, since it doesn't imply that whites are superior? ;)
 
It's also strange how quick some folks are quick to brand blacks as racist, but object to the use of the term when applied to whites because "liberals and blacks pull the race card to often". Why the double standard?

The fact is a lot of people don't understand what racism means and they only see it within their partisan lines.

pot meet kettle.
 
pot meet kettle.
You just proved that you're willing to blindly accuse others of things without evidence. I'm very careful not to call posters or really anybody racist since it's a difficult thing to gauge. In fact, I've defended the GOP and its affiliates several times against accusations of racism. This is clearly accusing others of racism only within party lines. :roll:
 
Last edited:
claiming one race is capable of genocide implies that race is inferior = racism
the US govt is and has been predominantly white (particularly when AIDS first came out), ie he is blaming "the man"

buy a clue. your bending over backwards to defend these turds shows just what a hack you really are.

Accusing the government of "genocide" is not racist. You keep stretching this and you aren't acknowledging the fact that the government has in fact experimented on blacks specifically with syphilis without informing them of their disease and watched them die and give it to their children for 30 years. Accusing another race of genocide is not racism either, for the record.

For more information, see my other post to you. And for the first time, I'm reporting someone since I'm over your refusal to have a conversation without freaking out.
 
Last edited:
Could we see some YouTube and other examples for enlightenment, please?

They prove their racism all the time.. you have a computer, go look them up on youtube. Whaddya lazy or something?
 
so then it becomes OK for whites to be racist against them because of their racism. afterall....turnabout is fair play
Nah, that would be turnabout on turnabout and that is poor form.
 
Accusing the government of "genocide" is not racist. You keep stretching this and you aren't acknowledging the fact that the government has in fact experimented on blacks specifically with syphilis without informing them of their disease and watched them die and give it to their children for 30 years. Accusing another race of genocide is not racism either, for the record.

For more information, see my other post to you. And for the first time, I'm reporting someone since I'm over your refusal to have a conversation without freaking out.

denial, obviously, is not just a river in Egypt. what the govt has/has not done is not relevant to this question posed by the OP. it's a red herring you threw in to detract from your blind defense of these 4 turds.
 
You just proved that you're willing to blindly accuse others of things without evidence.

and you just proved I was correct..

I'm very careful not to call posters or really anybody racist since it's a difficult thing to gauge.

BS, you've been slinging implications of racism around in this thread like you were sprinkling salt.

This is clearly accusing others of racism only within party lines. :roll:

your pathetic attempts to paint this as a political issue is sad beyond belief.
 
and you just proved I was correct..

BS, you've been slinging implications of racism around in this thread like you were sprinkling salt.

your pathetic attempts to paint this as a political issue is sad beyond belief.

nonsense...:)
 
denial, obviously, is not just a river in Egypt. what the govt has/has not done is not relevant to this question posed by the OP. it's a red herring you threw in to detract from your blind defense of these 4 turds.

what are you talking about. the post we were having a conversation about was your assertion that Wright accusing the government of creating aids was evidence of racism. i didn't bring up government, YOU DID. Good job. :applaud

Sharpton: the tawana brawley scandal
Wright: AIDS was invented by the white US govt to wipe out the blacks
Shabazz: white man is the devil
Farrakan: white people are potential humans, they haven't evolved yet
 
what are you talking about. the post we were having a conversation about was your assertion that Wright accusing the government of creating aids was evidence of racism. i didn't bring up government, YOU DID. Good job. :applaud

for people like wright... govt = whitey
 
Back
Top Bottom