Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Memory and legal/moral accountability

  1. #1
    Sage

    Skeptic Bob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Texas
    Last Seen
    04-25-19 @ 05:31 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Left
    Posts
    16,626

    Memory and legal/moral accountability

    Let’s say you commit a murder. Normally you are a law abiding person but in the heat of the moment, maybe due to adultery or something, you snap and kill a person. You are arrested, convicted, and sent to prison with a life sentence.

    A few months later something happens. Maybe you are hit over the head or get a disease or something. But the end result is you have retrograde amnesia, and have lost ALL memory from the past couple years, to include any memory of the crime. From your perspective you woke up in prison with zero idea of how you got there. Let’s also assume the medical technology is good enough to determine with certainty that you are not faking.

    Other than the amnesia, which doctors say is permanent, you have otherwise recovered and are physically healthy and can think rationally.

    Should you stay in prison or be released? Is any justice served by punishing a person for a crime that they have no memory of committing or planning?

    This is going to eventually lead into some other questions about the self, memory, technology and the law.

    My personal belief is that we ARE our memories. Remove a chunk of those memories and we are a different person. So my current position is that in the scenario above the convict should have their sentence commuted. In real life I would worry about the person faking, but in this hypothetical we know the person is not faking.
    “In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.” - Douglas Adams, Hitchhiker's Guide

  2. #2
    Sage
    Angel's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    New York City
    Last Seen
    Today @ 05:34 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    13,245
    Blog Entries
    17

    Re: Memory and legal/moral accountability

    Quote Originally Posted by Skeptic Bob View Post
    ...
    Should you stay in prison or be released? Is any justice served by punishing a person for a crime that they have no memory of committing or planning?
    ...
    Of course you stay in prison and serve out the sentence. The rest of society doesn't have amnesia. Justice is a broader concept than the OP makes it out to be.
    <a href=http://i.imgur.com/u68aMie.jpg target=_blank rel=nofollow>http://i.imgur.com/u68aMie.jpg</a>
    "I'm not 100% sure that you and I exist, but I'm surer that God exists than that you exist, and I'm as sure God exists as I am that I exist."
    Angel Trismegistus

  3. #3
    Advisor VINLO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Last Seen
    06-14-19 @ 03:27 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    335

    Re: Memory and legal/moral accountability

    Quote Originally Posted by Skeptic Bob View Post
    Let’s say you commit a murder. Normally you are a law abiding person but in the heat of the moment, maybe due to adultery or something, you snap and kill a person. You are arrested, convicted, and sent to prison with a life sentence.

    A few months later something happens. Maybe you are hit over the head or get a disease or something. But the end result is you have retrograde amnesia, and have lost ALL memory from the past couple years, to include any memory of the crime. From your perspective you woke up in prison with zero idea of how you got there. Let’s also assume the medical technology is good enough to determine with certainty that you are not faking.

    Other than the amnesia, which doctors say is permanent, you have otherwise recovered and are physically healthy and can think rationally.

    Should you stay in prison or be released? Is any justice served by punishing a person for a crime that they have no memory of committing or planning?

    This is going to eventually lead into some other questions about the self, memory, technology and the law.

    My personal belief is that we ARE our memories. Remove a chunk of those memories and we are a different person. So my current position is that in the scenario above the convict should have their sentence commuted. In real life I would worry about the person faking, but in this hypothetical we know the person is not faking.
    Our memories are part of our identity, even a large part of our identity, but they are not the totality of our identity.

    Also, losing the memory of the crime (regardless of how that happens) does not then excuse the fact that at the time the crime was committed, the criminal was deemed sane and morally responsible. As Angel said, justice goes way beyond just the convicted's sense of memory or guilt.

    Now, if this criminal with sudden memory loss actually cannot remember why he is in prison, we are morally obligated to inform him. You can't imprison someone who doesn't understand why they are in prison. So, as soon as he is sufficiently recovered to ask questions, we must answer them.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •