- Joined
- Feb 6, 2010
- Messages
- 100,421
- Reaction score
- 53,129
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Okay but you might have to agree that there has to be a single solitary point on that timeline where the first hominid appeared if for no other reason other than none existed up to that point. Looking at an evolution timeline chart with the ever-improving creatures branching off is an oversimplification without any explanation of what is it exactly the process that takes place in between each one, especially where changes appear that to any reasonable researcher would seem to require some sort of intelligent input. The mind-boggling designs we see in nature cannot be possible without some brilliant input. `Natural selection is driven by what? This is never adequately explained.
Natural selection is driven by the environment. Who gave you the impression that this was inexplicable?
Many people have trouble picturing these large changes, but the issue is that the changes...aren't large at all. They're very tiny changes. But a million tiny changes will eventually result in a radically different creature than you started with. Make sense?