I said, at various points:
1. IF you claim God exists, THEN you have to prove God exists. You do not get to claim God exists and then say it's on everyone else to disprove God's existence.
2. You responded "no one has to prove that God exists. No one can prove that God exists", then demanded everyone else step up to disprove God's existence. So I responded by pointing out that just as nobody can prove God's existence, nobody can disprove God's existence. I first pointed out that you have no business demanding that other people prove their claims if you don't want to prove yours. I next pointed out how dishonest it was to say that you don't have to prove God's existence because it's impossible, but that someone else has a burden to disprove it despite its being impossible.
3. You then moved the goal-posts by saying you aren't making any claims or alleging anything, you just have this "faith" that is apparently beyond question. I shot down the argument on the new field of battle by pointing out that when someone dismisses someone else's faith, they are not necessarily and in fact rarely making a claim that God does not exist - as you pretend - but rather are dismissing the act of the faithful in believing something despite knowing it to be beyond proof or disproof.
So you see, I haven't in fact said anyone with faith has to prove God exists. However, I am saying that if such persons tell other people that their faith is in some way correct or logical, then that necessarily involves a claim that some God or Spiritual Whatsit exists, and therefore it's on them to prove that this thing exists. If they cannot do that, then someone else can rightfully dismiss the claim without proving it.
Play by your own rules.
If you think you are being somehow misunderstood, I'd suggest making your point clear in the OP. You created an OP only talking about the burden of proof, and then proceeded to argue with various people and demanding that they disprove God's existence. I can only imagine you created this thread as a response to some other religious-type argument you had elsewhere. The most reasonable reading of all you said is that the only people who have a burden of proof on the question of religion are those people who dismiss the religion. That is wrong for multiple reasons, all of which I've said more than enough times. If that wasn't what you intended to communicate, then you should have posted what you meant right in the OP.
(And, PS, some of those posts you are "liking" actually run counter to what you are saying, at least as of the time of this edit.)