• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Science and Religion, a comparative study [W:222]

Angel

Angel

DP Veteran
Joined
May 3, 2017
Messages
18,001
Reaction score
2,909
Location
New York City
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Mhxifg4.jpg

The Legacy of Religion

...

32lzpEL.jpg

The Legacy of Science


:)

Irony
irony​
 
The legacy of religion.

September_11_Photo_Montage.jpg
 
Angel said:
You're confusing politics and religion, my friend, just like the terrorists.
You're being facile.
;)
Click to expand...

I hope you realise that politics are influenced by religion all the time.
 
TheGoverness said:
I hope you realise that politics are influenced by religion all the time.
Click to expand...
Yes, I do realize that. Still, politics is politics and religion religion. Music may be influenced by sexuality, or sexuality by music, without music or sexuality becoming anything other than music and sexuality.
:)
 
Quag said:
Do you know what a truther is?
Click to expand...
You're answering a question with a question, but I'll bite. Yes, I know what "a truther" is.
Now what sort of irony were you dispensing in that other post of yours? ;)
 
Angel said:
You're answering a question with a question, but I'll bite. Yes, I know what "a truther" is.
Now what sort of irony were you dispensing in that other post of yours? ;)
Click to expand...

You need to know what a truther is to understand both Governess`s and my posts hence my question. But Ill explain anyway

Truthers believe the steel in the WTC had to have beem melted for the buildings to collapse and cite the fact that jet fuel does not reach sufficient temperature to melt steel, thus there had to be some sort of nefarious plot by the evil govt using C4, mini-nukes, nanothermite, ray beam or a combination of them to cause the collapse.
Gonzo posted some pictures of the 911 attacks, Governess made a funny by stating that jet fuel cannot melt steel beams, thus it wasnt an attack by religious zealots on 911 but an ebil govt conspiracy (usually the reason is because America wanted to take over Iraqi oil fields by invading Afghanistan but if we get down into the confusing minutia of Trutherdom we will spend days, nay months or years trying to figure out how all their conflicting claims fit together).
My post was making a funny by stating that if the terrorists had God on their side then God coudl have made the steel melt and no need for C4, mini-nukes, nanothermite, ray beams or a combination of some/all of them.

To simplify, Governess was making a funny by saying religion wasnt involved in 911, it was the govt and I was making a funny on Governess`s funny by saying religion is involved if God did it.
 
Angel said:
You're confusing politics and religion, my friend, just like the terrorists.
You're being facile.
;)
Click to expand...

My post wasn't at all directed at Gonzo Rodeo's post.
It was specifically in regards to your OP.

Apparently we were both responding to you at the same time.
His post just snuck in before mine did, by seconds.
 
Dragonfly said:
:screwy

:inandout:
Click to expand...

Dragonfly said:
My post wasn't at all directed at Gonzo Rodeo's post.
It was specifically in regards to your OP.

Apparently we were both responding to you at the same time.
His post just snuck in before mine did, by seconds.
Click to expand...
Then would you kindly explain in text what your little icons were meant to say by way of comment on the OP?
I would appreciate the effort. :)
 
Angel said:
Then would you kindly explain in text what your little icons were meant to say by way of comment on the OP?
I would appreciate the effort. :)
Click to expand...

The OP is moronic. Asinine. Perhaps a little crazy.

be careful what you ask for, you just might get it
 
Dragonfly said:
The OP is moronic. Asinine. Perhaps a little crazy.

be careful what you ask for, you just might get it
Click to expand...

If you take out a 'little' then you could also remove the word 'perhaps'.
 
Dragonfly said:
The OP is moronic. Asinine. Perhaps a little crazy.

be careful what you ask for, you just might get it
Click to expand...

RAMOSS said:
If you take out a 'little' then you could also remove the word 'perhaps'.
Click to expand...
Would you stout fellows care to account for your negative opinions of the OP, i.e., would you care to point out just what, if anything, lies behind your judgments of asininity, moronicy, and craziness?

Or are you only throwing stones today? ;)
 
Angel said:
Would you stout fellows care to account for your negative opinions of the OP, i.e., would you care to point out just what, if anything, lies behind your judgments of asininity, moronicy, and craziness?

Or are you only throwing stones today? ;)
Click to expand...

No, I am looking at claims, and seeing that someone lives in a glass house.
 
RAMOSS said:
No, I am looking at claims, and seeing that someone lives in a glass house.
Click to expand...
It does not matter where you live, my friend. What are these "claims" and on what do you form your negative judgments of them? :)
 
Angel said:
It does not matter where you live, my friend. What are these "claims" and on what do you form your negative judgments of them? :)
Click to expand...

It was a very stupid OP. I am alive because of science, religion was no help to me.
 
Angel said:
Would you stout fellows care to account for your negative opinions of the OP, i.e., would you care to point out just what, if anything, lies behind your judgments of asininity, moronicy, and craziness?

Or are you only throwing stones today? ;)
Click to expand...

I tell you what, how about you expand on your pathetic OP and actually state outright what it is you were trying to convey?

Why did you chose those specific pictures? I don't even know what the first one is supposed to represent at all in terms of religion.
It could equally be a picture representing bestiality for all I know.

The ball is in your court mr. stout fellow. Explain your OP, in detail (not pictorially) and then we'll see if there's anything else worth discussing.
 
Angel said:
It does not matter where you live, my friend. What are these "claims" and on what do you form your negative judgments of them? :)
Click to expand...

The claims are your OP, and the negative judgement comes from the OP's unjust evaluation.
 
Let us not forget that religion brought us the Crusades, the Inquisition, the St. Bartholomew's Day Massacre, the Magdalene Laundries and many other evil episodes.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom