• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Which Is Worse Killing Or Hating?

rhinefire

DP Veteran
Joined
May 3, 2007
Messages
10,399
Reaction score
3,021
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Independent
Example: A person fatally shoots a bank teller during a robbery versus a person that hates some people because they are "different"? Which is the better person?
 
Example: A person fatally shoots a bank teller during a robbery versus a person that hates some people because they are "different"? Which is the better person?

I'm answering the title, since your example is poorly worded.

Hatred can be unlearned. Death is not currently correctable.
 
Hate when kept to oneself is just one's own problem. When directed at others, such as killing, it becomes others' problem
 
Example: A person fatally shoots a bank teller during a robbery versus a person that hates some people because they are "different"? Which is the better person?

Hate is an emotion.

Killing someone is actually an action.


It depends on your subjective viewpoint as well what you are discussing.
 
Example: A person fatally shoots a bank teller during a robbery versus a person that hates some people because they are "different"? Which is the better person?

You mean because the dead don't know after the dying is done, while a destroyed life takes years of pain to finish?
 
Hmmm...we could change up the example even further. Suppose a person is driving along a road they don't realize is icy, and as a result, they wreck, killing a pedestrian. In such a case, at best, one could say the driver is culpable for being negligent, but we wouldn't judge that person to be a bad person in the same way we would someone who was constantly yelling out racial slurs.

The point is that there are two distinct readings of "better." An act can be morally worse or better, or consequentially worse or better.
 
Example: A person fatally shoots a bank teller during a robbery versus a person that hates some people because they are "different"? Which is the better person?


If you're talking only about unjustifiable killings then killing is worse than hate.
 
I'm answering the title, since your example is poorly worded.

Hatred can be unlearned. Death is not currently correctable.

Many people have been returned from the dead.
 
Example: A person fatally shoots a bank teller during a robbery versus a person that hates some people because they are "different"? Which is the better person?

Worse in what way? Guilt? Societal consequences?

Does the person act on the hatred? I.E. though they don't kill, do they imprison those who they hate due to the difference?

This question is not answerable with an absolute.

I will subjectively answer the question you asked: fatally shooting someone is worse than silently hating a group of people.
 
If you mean premeditated killing then the answer is clearly killing. People have the freedom to hate and I would not want to see that freedom taken away. One of our most basic freedoms. But one doesn't have the freedom to take a life. Even "accidental" killing, due to negligence, stupidity, etc. is worse than hate.
 
Which is worse. Being a moron or an idiot. You should know.
And worst of all, the name-caller. You apparently don't know this.

As for the topic, well, we all know what's wrong with killing, but will someone kindly tell me what's wrong with hatred?
 
Which is worse, torturing a person or condoning torture by others?
 
Example: A person fatally shoots a bank teller during a robbery versus a person that hates some people because they are "different"? Which is the better person?

Silly question, everyone hates, if they say they don't they are either a liar, or mentally ill. It is only when thoughts turn to actions that criminality occurs.
 
Which is worse, torturing a person or condoning torture by others?

Every tax paying American has condoned the torture of others... It is the old issue of sins of commission vs. sins of omission.
 
Example: A person fatally shoots a bank teller during a robbery versus a person that hates some people because they are "different"? Which is the better person?

Me thinks you did not think this out real well before posting it. Just saying...........
 
Every tax paying American has condoned the torture of others... It is the old issue of sins of commission vs. sins of omission.

Some of us tax payers have objected by writing their elected representatives, allowing one's conscience to be clear at least.

Others remain silent. The former is not condoning it, the latter is.
 
Back
Top Bottom