- Joined
- Jun 6, 2014
- Messages
- 43,804
- Reaction score
- 8,671
- Location
- Flanders.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
A hoax and a mistake and no lost civilizations described in detail.
I've been intrigued by the increasing number of scientists that proclaim it's very likely that we're living in a computer simulation, "The Matrix" if you will.
Do you believe it's possible that one day, say in a thousand years, quantum computers will be so powerful as to create a world where the beings believe they're actually real? Say, if you could take The Sims 4 and make those beings think their world existed. And if these computers could do that, couldn't these computers run billions of simulations at once?
So, is it more likely that we're the actual civilization that invents this technology one day, or is it more likely that we're just one of billions of simulations that our ancestors are running?
I've been intrigued by the increasing number of scientists that proclaim it's very likely that we're living in a computer simulation, "The Matrix" if you will.
Do you believe it's possible that one day, say in a thousand years, quantum computers will be so powerful as to create a world where the beings believe they're actually real? Say, if you could take The Sims 4 and make those beings think their world existed. And if these computers could do that, couldn't these computers run billions of simulations at once?
So, is it more likely that we're the actual civilization that invents this technology one day, or is it more likely that we're just one of billions of simulations that our ancestors are running?
Not in my experience.
I think the most obvious proof that it's a plausible theory is when we are able to develop that technology ourselves. It may not prove for sure that this universe is a simulation, but it'll be very compelling evidence of the possibility that we're just a simulation running inside a simulation inside a simulation...Tell me, how do you use science to determine if this is a simulation or not? If this is a stimulation then science is part of it.
The only universal factor is consciousness, in terms of observational power. The answer has to lie there, not in externalities like scientific tools.
Do you disagree?
As for real AI ? I doubt we'll see it in our lifetime or our childrens llifetime.
The fastest supercomputer is still just crunching 1 and 0's, data in and data out.
I sometimes agree with the other sentiment though, that its not the computing speed that limits us. We have and have had the technology to create AI for some time now.
Its the size of the project, and the enormous time investment in TEACHING the AI, that is the only real hurdle.