• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Are rights objectively real?

RAMOSS said:
I find it amusing that he does the logical fallacy of equivocation between the philosophy of objectivity and the definition of something being objective.
Click to expand...

I would say that Frank err I mean Po is shooting himself in the foot with this new line he's taking but I think he's actually staring down the barrel while he pulls the trigger.
 
Master PO said:
how many times did you search the internet trying to show philosphy being subjective, and were disappointed?
Click to expand...

Still refusing to answer questions I see.
I'm guessing its completely fogged in
 
Master PO said:
i said a princple is a truth, and the DOI is he founding prinples of america, by stating "these truths"
Click to expand...

A principle is not a "truth" in that it is objectively true. The existence of the sun is true and not because a document says it is true. Words written by men may reflect their principles, but this does not make their chosen principles objectively true. A document written by men expresses only their personal ideas. Just because they call these ideas "truths" does not make them so. They were expressing their philosophical beliefs, which we may or may not agree with. They are debatable for all time.
 
Last edited:
Quag said:
Still refusing to answer questions I see.
I'm guessing its completely fogged in
Click to expand...

Quag said:
I would say that Frank err I mean Po is shooting himself in the foot with this new line he's taking but I think he's actually staring down the barrel while he pulls the trigger.
Click to expand...
:doh

twice now you have referenced me in a personal way ,this tells me you flat out have nothing any more, you are not even continuing with your "philosophy is subjective" theme.
 
Last edited:
Master PO said:
:doh

twice now you have referenced me in a personal way ,this tells me you flat out have nothing any more, you are not even continuing with your "philosophy is subjective" theme.
Click to expand...

Still refusing to answer questions I see
 
Master PO said:
talking about me, and dropping your position does not bode well for you
Click to expand...

Nothing for me to do, you already destroyed your own position all by yourself.
So will you answer my questions?
 
Quag said:
Nothing for me to do, you already destroyed your own position all by yourself. So will you answer my questions?
Click to expand...
sorry no..... my position is sound, your position is not tenable because:

you have no provided anything for your case you have made claims for, you have derailed your own thread and talked about me being frank, which was a sign of weakness

you have dropped your philosophy is subjective postings.

you will continue you keep asking for questions and playing your little game, but i really don't care, and until you provide something we cannot go any further.but iam here for you when you choose to do that, if ever
 
Last edited:
Master PO said:
sorry no..... my position is sound, your position is not tenable because:

you have no provided anything for your case you have made claims for, you have derailed your own thread and talked about me being frank, which was a sign of weakness

you have dropped your philosophy is subjective postings.

you will continue you keep asking for questions and playing your little game, but i really don't care, and until you provide something we cannot go any further.but iam here for you when you choose to do that, if ever
Click to expand...
Nothing for me to do, you already destroyed your own position all by yourself. So will you answer my questions?
 
Quag said:
Nothing for me to do, you already destroyed your own position all by yourself. So will you answer my questions?
Click to expand...

i know you wish to forget your claim of our government creates rights, which you have failed to show, when you can produce something, come talk to me;)
 
Master PO said:
i know you wish to forget your claim of our government creates rights, which you have failed to show, when you can produce something, come talk to me;)
Click to expand...

Your blindness to how badly you have destroyed your own position is probably the same reason you held that position in the same place.
But please continue to post, you are only hurting yourself.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom