• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Neo-masculinity is the same thing as machismo

Celebrity

DP Veteran
Joined
May 13, 2016
Messages
5,257
Reaction score
761
Location
VT, USA
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
An increased amount of backlash toward feminist indoctrination and socialism is taking place in America. Third wave feminists are no longer viewed as heroes by men, since the agenda of feminism now comes at a direct cost to men. Why is it that in recent years, men, some of whom are very close to their mothers and sisters and may have been raised by single mothers, are subscribing to the so-called "red pill theory?"

I would argue that it is not sexist to speculate about "what women want," although men realize that they may never fully appreciate or understand that. Instead, neo-masculinity will strengthen families by weeding out less resourceful men from a pool of eligible bachelors. That will help women and men by improving the quality of resources in marriage and the integrity of a relationship between a man and women.

 
An increased amount of backlash toward feminist indoctrination and socialism is taking place in America. Third wave feminists are no longer viewed as heroes by men, since the agenda of feminism now comes at a direct cost to men. Why is it that in recent years, men, some of whom are very close to their mothers and sisters and may have been raised by single mothers, are subscribing to the so-called "red pill theory?"

I would argue that it is not sexist to speculate about "what women want," although men realize that they may never fully appreciate or understand that. Instead, neo-masculinity will strengthen families by weeding out less resourceful men from a pool of eligible bachelors. That will help women and men by improving the quality of resources in marriage and the integrity of a relationship between a man and women.



So women no longer have to get married to avoid starvation or poverty... because of welfare?
 
Okay, after doing a bit of digging, neomasculinity is one of those unique internet subcultures that could never get off the ground in the real world, mostly because of how inane and ludicrous it is.

A blogger named Daryush Valizadeh, or as he's known online, "Roosh," is the creator of the neomasculinity movement. He claims to be a pickup artist who has no permanent address because he is too busy traveli.g the world seducing countless scores of women, many of which he also claimed were too drunk to give consent. He is also a paranoid imbecil who has responded to reporters' questions with brilliant comments like "Do you even lift?" He's also the guy who advocated legalizing rape on private property to protect women from rape, if you guys remember that incident last year.
 
Men are experimenting trying to find some form of masculinity that women will accept outside of the bedroom that does not result in the complete removal of our balls.

We are not there yet.
 
Me and Son#1 have this philosophy about all that: We just be ourselves and if somebody don't like it, they can seek their entertainment elsewhere. :D


tombstone17.jpg
 

I wasn't attempting to answer the question, just commenting on it. Maybe you can answer it better. I think it's a very pertinent question since relating gender theory to political or economic theory means taking something for granted along the way. I guess the conclusion which is drawn from that theory is that men who stay well away from socialism should be better off in the long term as individuals.

I guess I'm not qualified to provide a real answer on where socialism is in this country, because I'm not a socialist and I have very limited contact with any socialism. The last time I discussed socialism in person or in a forum was around 2009. Still, it seems that current policies on issues like healthcare (e.g. single payer, Obamacare) are described as "socialist" by right wingers.
 
Okay, after doing a bit of digging, neomasculinity is one of those unique internet subcultures that could never get off the ground in the real world, mostly because of how inane and ludicrous it is.

A blogger named Daryush Valizadeh, or as he's known online, "Roosh," is the creator of the neomasculinity movement. He claims to be a pickup artist who has no permanent address because he is too busy traveli.g the world seducing countless scores of women, many of which he also claimed were too drunk to give consent. He is also a paranoid imbecil who has responded to reporters' questions with brilliant comments like "Do you even lift?" He's also the guy who advocated legalizing rape on private property to protect women from rape, if you guys remember that incident last year.

I don't advocate rape.

There's a black sheep in every flock.

I think it's more likely that masculinism lags behind feminism, which has built up quite a bit of momentum around empowering women. In fact, while masculinity is in the dictionary on my version of Chrome, masculinism is not.
 
I wasn't attempting to answer the question, just commenting on it. Maybe you can answer it better. I think it's a very pertinent question since relating gender theory to political or economic theory means taking something for granted along the way. I guess the conclusion which is drawn from that theory is that men who stay well away from socialism should be better off in the long term as individuals.

I guess I'm not qualified to provide a real answer on where socialism is in this country, because I'm not a socialist and I have very limited contact with any socialism. The last time I discussed socialism in person or in a forum was around 2009. Still, it seems that current policies on issues like healthcare (e.g. single payer, Obamacare) are described as "socialist" by right wingers.

Fair enough.
 
Okay, after doing a bit of digging, neomasculinity is one of those unique internet subcultures that could never get off the ground in the real world, mostly because of how inane and ludicrous it is.

A blogger named Daryush Valizadeh, or as he's known online, "Roosh," is the creator of the neomasculinity movement. He claims to be a pickup artist who has no permanent address because he is too busy traveli.g the world seducing countless scores of women, many of which he also claimed were too drunk to give consent. He is also a paranoid imbecil who has responded to reporters' questions with brilliant comments like "Do you even lift?" He's also the guy who advocated legalizing rape on private property to protect women from rape, if you guys remember that incident last year.

Thanks. I was wondering what the heck he's talking about. It's some kind mens rights garbage.
 
It's not, and neither is machismo.
 
An increased amount of backlash toward feminist indoctrination and socialism is taking place in America. Third wave feminists are no longer viewed as heroes by men, since the agenda of feminism now comes at a direct cost to men. Why is it that in recent years, men, some of whom are very close to their mothers and sisters and may have been raised by single mothers, are subscribing to the so-called "red pill theory?"

I would argue that it is not sexist to speculate about "what women want," although men realize that they may never fully appreciate or understand that. Instead, neo-masculinity will strengthen families by weeding out less resourceful men from a pool of eligible bachelors. That will help women and men by improving the quality of resources in marriage and the integrity of a relationship between a man and women.

It will leave the feminist women isolated as North American men seek women from other cultures, both as mates and co-workers. One tool against the Socialist is to use their own rules and favored groups against each other. Notice how Muslims are overlooked by the Gaystapo for example. If I hire an Indian woman over an American woman, aren't I just "practicing diversity"?
 
An increased amount of backlash toward feminist indoctrination and socialism is taking place in America. Third wave feminists are no longer viewed as heroes by men, since the agenda of feminism now comes at a direct cost to men. Why is it that in recent years, men, some of whom are very close to their mothers and sisters and may have been raised by single mothers, are subscribing to the so-called "red pill theory?"

I would argue that it is not sexist to speculate about "what women want," although men realize that they may never fully appreciate or understand that. Instead, neo-masculinity will strengthen families by weeding out less resourceful men from a pool of eligible bachelors. That will help women and men by improving the quality of resources in marriage and the integrity of a relationship between a man and women.



Why?
Because the rather persistent message of modern feminism is "women have problems, men are problems."
 
Back
Top Bottom