• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Noah's Flood versus Reality[W:366]

Re: Noah's Flood versus Reality

Logicman said:
Tsk tsk...look who's talking.

You won't even answer a question about whether or not you believe in God, much less provide any evidence to back up such a belief one way or the other.
Click to expand...

ANd why should I? That's personal information that I don't feel like telling you;
 
Re: Noah's Flood versus Reality

RAMOSS said:
ANd why should I? That's personal information that I don't feel like telling you;
Click to expand...

Then don't expect answers to your claims and questions.
 
Re: Noah's Flood versus Reality

Logicman said:
Then don't expect answers to your claims and questions.
Click to expand...

There is a difference between you trying to get personal information from me, verses being able to back up your own claims. I know you are using it as an excuse because you can't back up your claims. However, my not talking about personal information about me is not making a claim. Therein lies the difference. You are making a positive statement you can't back up. I am not making a statement that I have to back up.
 
Re: Noah's Flood versus Reality

RAMOSS said:
There is a difference between you trying to get personal information from me, verses being able to back up your own claims. I know you are using it as an excuse because you can't back up your claims. However, my not talking about personal information about me is not making a claim. Therein lies the difference. You are making a positive statement you can't back up. I am not making a statement that I have to back up.
Click to expand...

See my previous post to you.
 
Re: Noah's Flood versus Reality

Logicman said:
Tsk tsk...look who's talking.

You won't even answer a question about whether or not you believe in God, much less provide any evidence to back up such a belief one way or the other. You just love to bash whoever does believe. Tacky.
Click to expand...

The positive claim is yours, you are just trying to shift the burden (no surprise there).
 
Last edited:
Re: Noah's Flood versus Reality

Logicman said:
See my previous post to you.
Click to expand...

I never expected you to answer any questions. I view it as an opportunity for you to show people that you indeed know what you are talking about, but you don't seem to be willing to show that. That's your loss.
 
Re: Noah's Flood versus Reality

William Rea said:
The positive claim is yours, you are just trying to shift the burden (no surprise there).
Click to expand...

You disputing the account of the flood in Genesis? I'll stand by it - that there was a great flood. As far as the animals and all that you can deal with them yourself.
 
Last edited:
Re: Noah's Flood versus Reality

RAMOSS said:
I never expected you to answer any questions. I view it as an opportunity for you to show people that you indeed know what you are talking about, but you don't seem to be willing to show that. That's your loss.
Click to expand...

Ramoss, don't bother me with your nonsense. I don't care to debate with someone who won't reciprocate properly.
 
Re: Noah's Flood versus Reality

Logicman said:
Ramoss, don't bother me with your nonsense. I don't care to debate with someone who won't reciprocate properly.
Click to expand...

I will back up any claim I make. If I can't back it up, I won't make it. You don't seem to be willing to back up your claims.

I don't ask personal questions of you. I don't ask what your faith is, nor do I expect you to answer any questions about your personal history.
 
Re: Noah's Flood versus Reality

RAMOSS said:
I will back up any claim I make. If I can't back it up, I won't make it. You don't seem to be willing to back up your claims.

I don't ask personal questions of you. I don't ask what your faith is, nor do I expect you to answer any questions about your personal history.
Click to expand...

The problem is, he doesn't have any claims, he has blind and fanatical beliefs which he doesn't have evidence for because blind faith requires no support. You can ask until the cows come home for evidence and he won't supply any because that's the fundamental nature of religion. That's just one reason why the fundamental nature of religion is so idiotic. It's based entirely on wishful thinking and not facts.
 
Re: Noah's Flood versus Reality

RAMOSS said:
I will back up any claim I make. If I can't back it up, I won't make it. You don't seem to be willing to back up your claims.

I don't ask personal questions of you. I don't ask what your faith is, nor do I expect you to answer any questions about your personal history.
Click to expand...

You don't listen.

I'm placing you on Ignore.

Bye bye.

<click>
 
Re: Noah's Flood versus Reality

Cephus said:
The problem is, he doesn't have any claims, he has blind and fanatical beliefs which he doesn't have evidence for because blind faith requires no support. You can ask until the cows come home for evidence and he won't supply any because that's the fundamental nature of religion. That's just one reason why the fundamental nature of religion is so idiotic. It's based entirely on wishful thinking and not facts.
Click to expand...

That's just more of your usual baloney.
 
Re: Noah's Flood versus Reality

Logicman said:
That's just more of your usual baloney.
Click to expand...

You can't even tell truth from baloney, that's not surprising.
 
Re: Noah's Flood versus Reality

Logicman said:
You disputing the account of the flood in Genesis? I'll stand by it - that there was a great flood.
Click to expand...

Ok, fine. How could someone deduce that such a flood occurred, and approximately how long ago, without the Bible? What I mean is that if someone was completely unaware of the Noahic flood story, what physical evidence would lead them to the conclusion of a giant catostophic flood?
 
Re: Noah's Flood versus Reality

Moderator's Warning:
Please keep in mind this portion of the stickied warning at the top of the forum:

Attempts to derail threads by continually and/or singularly attacking the idea of skepticism within theological discussions may result in thread bans and/or infractions. Expressions of ones personal faith as it relates to a topic is allowed; however, continual attempts to derail a thread by demanding others accept such views, and refusing to engage in substantive back and forth debate on the actual topic, may also result in thread bans and/or infractions.
Click to expand...

Violating that will result in a thread ban and/or points.

Also, discussing one's ignore list, is not the topic of the thread. Baiting and off-topic nonsense need to stop.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom