• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

The World without a World View

SayMyName

Live, Love, Laugh.
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 17, 2013
Messages
2,016
Reaction score
3,391
Location
Shanghai, China
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Has the world that we live in entered a new age of post-structuralism, lacking world vision, as anthropologist Alan MacFarlane asserts in his latest study? Are we truly becoming a species on the planet shifting, treading, and simply reacting mindlessly, constantly in motion as people, organizations, and nation states, but lacking a common vision for the next step in the evolution of humankind. I am not yet sure, but there is much to his argument that sways me to believe this might be so.

 
Has the world that we live in entered a new age of post-structuralism, lacking world vision, as anthropologist Alan MacFarlane asserts in his latest study? Are we truly becoming a species on the planet shifting, treading, and simply reacting mindlessly, constantly in motion as people, organizations, and nation states, but lacking a common vision for the next step in the evolution of humankind. I am not yet sure, but there is much to his argument that sways me to believe this might be so.


The idea that our vision matters the least in the next evolutionary step is rather preposterous. It got this far without need of our vision.

I have no interest in watching thirty min of a crank pontificating to youtube.
 
Has the world that we live in entered a new age of post-structuralism, lacking world vision, as anthropologist Alan MacFarlane asserts in his latest study? Are we truly becoming a species on the planet shifting, treading, and simply reacting mindlessly, constantly in motion as people, organizations, and nation states, but lacking a common vision for the next step in the evolution of humankind. I am not yet sure, but there is much to his argument that sways me to believe this might be so.



Now that was an interesting little vid. Really very good. Thx.
 
The idea that our vision matters the least in the next evolutionary step is rather preposterous. It got this far without need of our vision.

I have no interest in watching thirty min of a crank pontificating to youtube.

Somehow, I thought of you as that kind of guy.
 
Somehow, I thought of you as that kind of guy.

The phrase post- structuralism put me off watching it. I do not believe that there has ever been a common vision for mankind's next step. In the days before mass communication how was this common vision propagated over the population of the Earth and have you an example of such a common vision?
 
Has the world that we live in entered a new age of post-structuralism, lacking world vision, as anthropologist Alan MacFarlane asserts in his latest study? Are we truly becoming a species on the planet shifting, treading, and simply reacting mindlessly, constantly in motion as people, organizations, and nation states, but lacking a common vision for the next step in the evolution of humankind. I am not yet sure, but there is much to his argument that sways me to believe this might be so.

video=youtube ...
I listened to the video and I guess that you paraphrased it just right with the title = "The World without a World View".

There is no vision or purpose any more, and I see it as dangerous and inhuman.

But I really just mean for the USA as we have become mostly infidels to our Christianity.

Religion is what gives humans our world view, and Christianity has been largely trampled and suppressed in the USA.

In other places like China has plenty of vision, and India is booming, and all Islamic Countries are dynamic, and Catholic Countries are very happy people, so it really is just Protestant Christianity which has fallen under foot and lost its vision and purpose.

This is why the US elections have become so stale, in that the Politicians have nothing of substance to say.

This is why we have stupid wars going onward with no vision to win or to stop as we have no point or purpose.

If we the USA would honestly turn to God to find out what is right from wrong THEN yes then we would find out our purpose glowing like a star.
 
If we the USA would honestly turn to God to find out what is right from wrong THEN yes then we would find out our purpose glowing like a star.

Would the god Krishna serve the purpose?
 
Would the god Krishna serve the purpose?
Yes - for me it would - but for the USA we here need to stop our infidelity to Christianity first.

My understanding is that the person (or demigod) Krishna is the same person (or demigod) as Jesus Christ.

The names are just in different languages.

Christ in Greek is Christos and it is equivolent to Christna as in Krishna = Christ.

Christ is translated as anointed one.

Krishna means the dark one.

Both have the same root meaning.

In the Bhagavadgita it tells that the message of Krishna is "dark" to those who can not see, but to the enlightened person it is NOT dark but bright as daylight.
 
Back
Top Bottom