- Joined
- Oct 18, 2007
- Messages
- 31,276
- Reaction score
- 19,786
- Location
- East Coast - USA
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
So, which came first - the chicken or the egg?
Why?
Why?
Last edited:
So, which came first - the chicken or the egg?
Why?
So, which came first - the chicken or the egg?
Why?
So, which came first - the chicken or the egg?
Why?
So, which came first - the chicken or the egg?
Why?
I chose the chicken, since the egg is the reproductive process of the host, who lays it, so you can't reproduce something that wasn't previously in existence.
That is precisely why it is the egg. Whatever final mutation was required for the "pre-chicken" to become the "chicken" occurred first in an egg form, and then hatched and gave forth to a chicken who then had more eggs, etc.
I chose the chicken, since the egg is the reproductive process of the host, who lays it, so you can't reproduce something that wasn't previously in existence.
Dinosaurs laid eggs.
So, which came first - the chicken or the egg?
Why?
I chose the chicken, since the egg is the reproductive process of the host, who lays it, so you can't reproduce something that wasn't previously in existence.
The egg existed in the linear transition to the chicken.
say a feathered-lizard creature was laying eggs 1 million years before the modern chicken...through variation that lizard bird became more bird....then more chicken-like ...then chicken. the egg was alone for the transition since before the lizard-bird.
If the question were what came first the chicken egg or the chicken...then your answer would be better utilized.
I'm not getting your point
Unless you believe that an egg evolved from a single cell organism, don't you have to accept that a "creature" of some sort existed before the first egg was laid?
dinosaur has sex with another dinosaur.
DNA replication causes mutation generating a new species - the chicken
chicken lays egg.
therefore, you could say that the egg came first, because the egg came from the dinosaur and then the chicken came next.
of course, you could say that that dinosaur didn't really lay a chicken egg, it laid a dinosaur egg, and out popped a chicken, which would mean chicken came first.
A reasonable hypothesis, although wrong
So, which came first - the chicken or the egg?
Why?
Sorry, but no. Given that the mutations that lead to evolution occur at sexual reproduction, logically whatever the final mutation was that creates "Chickens" would have shown up first in Egg Form. You are correct that something would have had to have lain that egg, but that something would not be a chicken, but rather, a Pre Chicken.
Look CJ, I really don't want to be a jerk about this, but the science is settled on this issue. If you are so desperate to be an Eggist Denier, well, that's you're freedom of speech, I suppose, but you need to understand that, for the good of the children, we're going to have to limit your ability to speak in public on this issue.
I have a feeling you're egging me on and I just want you to know I'm no chicken so I'll scramble to come up with a witty response.