I mean, I watch Ghost Adventurers, I like that stuff. But there's no real proof. If there were, then there is perhaps stronger case for an afterlife, or perhaps it could all still be explained by natural phenomenon. I'm not 100% sure if it's going to net you exactly what you think it would.
I am not saying to believe any TV shows or believe some books or even to believe me, as you and we all can experience the Ghost and spirits and Demons for our self, and I expect you to see the Ghosts and then believe your own experience.
That way you would have the 100% proof for your self just as I already have the 100% proof for my self.
And I am happy to view the Ghost and Demons as "natural phenomenon" because they are real and being real makes them as natural as we are.
It could just be a natural phenomenon, I think that perhaps you read too much into it. You're ascribing significance that isn't represented by the data set. Vacuum fluctuations (which we know exist even now) could have started everything. And a vacuum genesis explains a flat universe (a flat universe can exist for infinity).
The Big-Bang is a natural phenomenon even if it is the creation of God, because Nature is just another name for God.
The point is that the Big-Bang is a "confirmed miracle" being real while it is NOT supernatural and not magic.
And the Big-Bang would still be a miracle even if it was not done by any God.
Plus there's a new theory out there using quantum gravity that challenges the Big Bang in its entirety. It claims the universe has always been. But that's very very preliminary, and there's not much more than math to back it up at this point. If one wanted to challenge the Big Bang, they'd have quite the mountain to climb.
Yes I read about it, but it just says that there was not a small singularity and that the universe was still huge if not infinite and then started to expand as we see it expanding now.
So it still is telling that there was "A BEGINNING" as in Genesis 1:1 "In the beginning ..."
To me it is logical and understandable that science can not figure out what was really first (the beginning) because that is where we find God.
=================================================
Yes, it is important that the animal is not stupid enough or without feelings because otherwise their slaughter would not make their meat as tasteful as they are.
That is correct - that the ugly violent death is the true flavor in the meat.
What gets to me is that you say it so you know it and yet you are not ashamed of it, as you take a low pride for being inhumane and for feeding your self with cruelty.
Unfortunately it is myself who carries your guilt and the guilt of humanity, because I am ashamed of you and of all humans who do such things.
