• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

LOL "Big Bang"[W:19,438]

Michael Johnson

Libturd Destroyer
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 29, 2012
Messages
5,818
Reaction score
924
Location
Hell's Kitchen - Where I cook Lying Libs for break
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D5uWkHALd0Q

While I do recommend the whole video to watch - as well as the whole video series - fast-forward to 1:16:47 that easily debunks the "Big Bang Theory."

Clinging to the notion that something came from nothing, like two atoms forming together and then BOOM, out of nowhere the universe "expanded."


"4.6 Billion years ago." LOL! Show me the evidence!
 
Re: LOL "Big Bang"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D5uWkHALd0Q

While I do recommend the whole video to watch - as well as the whole video series - fast-forward to 1:16:47 that easily debunks the "Big Bang Theory."

Clinging to the notion that something came from nothing, like two atoms forming together and then BOOM, out of nowhere the universe "expanded."


"4.6 Billion years ago." LOL! Show me the evidence!

Due to the severity of ignorance in this post I'm going to keep my answer short as to avoid wasting much time on this. The Big Bang Theory does NOT say anything about something coming from nothing, and it didn't come from nowhere. We know that the universe is at least 13.8 billion years old. The number you're trying to refer to is the age of the earth, but you are too uneducated on the subject to know the difference. The evidence is out there for those who are intelligent enough to comprehend it.

The universe was not created 6,000 years ago by a wizard.
 
Re: LOL "Big Bang"

images



LOL



Kent Hovind - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Re: LOL "Big Bang"

"4.6 Billion years ago." LOL! Show me the evidence!

We can try find the oldest piece of our planet, and then figure out how old that piece is using radiometric dating. This process measures the decay of radioactive isotopes. Similarly we can look at the speed at which the radioactive decay of uranium into lead occurs and come up with an informed estimate.

Did you know that there exists rocks on every continent that are older than 3.5 billion years old? I think that's pretty cool.

Clinging to the notion that something came from nothing, like two atoms forming together and then BOOM, out of nowhere the universe "expanded."

That's not what the Big Bang model states.
 
Re: LOL "Big Bang"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D5uWkHALd0Q

While I do recommend the whole video to watch - as well as the whole video series - fast-forward to 1:16:47 that easily debunks the "Big Bang Theory."

Clinging to the notion that something came from nothing, like two atoms forming together and then BOOM, out of nowhere the universe "expanded."


"4.6 Billion years ago." LOL! Show me the evidence!

Only a scientifically illiterate person would think that Kent Hovind has disproved the big bang theory.
 
Re: LOL "Big Bang"

Due to the severity of ignorance in this post I'm going to keep my answer short as to avoid wasting much time on this. The Big Bang Theory does NOT say anything about something coming from nothing, and it didn't come from nowhere. We know that the universe is at least 13.8 billion years old. The number you're trying to refer to is the age of the earth, but you are too uneducated on the subject to know the difference. The evidence is out there for those who are intelligent enough to comprehend it.

LOL you mad? As I said, prove to me that the universe as a whole is "13.8 billion years old." I mean wow, listen to yourself. Is that even a number in terms of age or time? Ridiculous.

See when I hear you atheists make asinine claims in order to suit your alternative belief, the burden of proof is on you.

The universe was not created 6,000 years ago by a wizard.

You're the one stating he's a wizard. Clearly you haven't read the Bible on black magic.
 
Re: LOL "Big Bang"

Only a scientifically illiterate person would think that Kent Hovind has disproved the big bang theory.

A "scientifically illiterate" person only needs common sense to see through such hogwash.

Sorry but meaningless equations are not to answer to everything in life.
 
Re: LOL "Big Bang"

LOL you mad? As I said, prove to me that the universe as a whole is "13.8 billion years old." I mean wow, listen to yourself. Is that even a number in terms of age or time? Ridiculous.

See when I hear you atheists make asinine claims in order to suit your alternative belief, the burden of proof is on you.



You're the one stating he's a wizard. Clearly you haven't read the Bible on black magic.


Did it ever occur to you that atheists are atheists because they're still waiting for 'you Christians' to prove there is a God? So how about you proving there is a God first and then you can talk about if, who or what created the big bang....mk?
 
Re: LOL "Big Bang"

LOL you mad? As I said, prove to me that the universe as a whole is "13.8 billion years old." I mean wow, listen to yourself. Is that even a number in terms of age or time? Ridiculous.

See when I hear you atheists make asinine claims in order to suit your alternative belief, the burden of proof is on you.



You're the one stating he's a wizard. Clearly you haven't read the Bible on black magic.


LOL!

"Wow that numbers really big! I can't understand big numbers! It can't be true!"

Thanks I needed the laugh...
 
Re: LOL "Big Bang"

Did it ever occur to you that atheists are atheists because they're still waiting for 'you Christians' to prove there is a God? So how about you proving there is a God first and then you can talk about if, who or what created the big bang....mk?

Prove that the universe is exactly 13.8 billion years old. LOL
 
Re: LOL "Big Bang"

A "scientifically illiterate" person only needs common sense to see through such hogwash.

Sorry but meaningless equations are not to answer to everything in life.

My God, this is classic. 'Common sense'! Thanks, my first good laugh of the day.
 
Re: LOL "Big Bang"

Did it ever occur to you that atheists are atheists because they're still waiting for 'you Christians' to prove there is a God? So how about you proving there is a God first and then you can talk about if, who or what created the big bang....mk?

In it's most simple of arguments, if you believe the universe is expanding, as scientists are learning, what is it expanding into? And if you think that space beyond is infinite, as scientists suggest, then infinity reveals that God could exist, or couldn't exist. Since it can't be proved God can't exist, your question has been answered.

So step up and provide the proof asked. Or dodge the question again.
 
Re: LOL "Big Bang"

Prove that the universe is exactly 13.8 billion years old. LOL

If you can't believe that a number like 13.7 billion even exists, then it seems unlikely you'll be able to follow a conclusive proof.

They're several proofs, for the record. We can find the age of specific elements, the oldest stars, the oldest star clusters (measuring luminosity enables an estimation of the upper limit of the age of the cluster), the oldest white dwarfs, or use cosmological models hinging on the Hubble constant for even greater accuracy.
 
Re: LOL "Big Bang"

In it's most simple of arguments, if you believe the universe is expanding, as scientists are learning, what is it expanding into? And if you think that space beyond is infinite, as scientists suggest, then infinity reveals that God could exist, or couldn't exist..

Look at a technical definition of the universe and you'll get an answer to your question.

And if you think that space beyond is infinite, as scientists suggest, then infinity reveals that God could exist, or couldn't exist. Since it can't be proved God can't exist, your question has been answered.

So step up and provide the proof asked. Or dodge the question again.

You're affirming a proposition and therefore the burden of proof lies on your shoulders to make a case for said proposition. If God cannot be proven to exist or not exist, then the proposition is nonsensical by definition.
 
Last edited:
Re: LOL "Big Bang"

Prove that the universe is exactly 13.8 billion years old. LOL

This is why people laugh at religious zealots. If you want to understand science, go to a scientist or read a science journal. We have literally thousands of the brightest people on earth working as physicists and studying this every day, running experiments and tests on this every day, and every bit of evidence we have points towards a universe of around 13.8 billion years in age. We have no evidence that points toward a universe that's only thousands of years old.

And btw, since you can't even comprehend billions of years...

Hubble Finds Small Galaxy More Than 13 Billion Light-Years Away - SciTech Daily

Are you saying that these galaxies aren't 13 billion light years away? Do you understand that if the universe were 10,000 years old, we wouldn't be able to see these galaxies since the light from them wouldn't have even reached us yet?
 
Re: LOL "Big Bang"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D5uWkHALd0Q

While I do recommend the whole video to watch - as well as the whole video series - fast-forward to 1:16:47 that easily debunks the "Big Bang Theory."

Clinging to the notion that something came from nothing, like two atoms forming together and then BOOM, out of nowhere the universe "expanded."


"4.6 Billion years ago." LOL! Show me the evidence!

A more recent theory based in part on quantum physics postulates that there was no singularity, that the universe expanded according to quantum trajectories, meaning that it has always been kept at a finite size and therefore might be infinite in duration.

So, instead of a big bang it's more like a big boing boing boing ....

One interesting aspect of this theory is that it doesn't require dark matter or energy. Instead it postulates that gravitons form Bose-Einstein condensates that serve the same role.

With this model the difficult aspects of the Big Bang, such as the singularity, hyperexpansion, and dark matter and energy, are avoided. [1411.0753] Dark matter and dark energy from Bose-Einstein condensate

No Big Bang? Quantum equation predicts universe has no beginning
 
Re: LOL "Big Bang"

In it's most simple of arguments, if you believe the universe is expanding, as scientists are learning, what is it expanding into? And if you think that space beyond is infinite, as scientists suggest, then infinity reveals that God could exist, or couldn't exist. Since it can't be proved God can't exist, your question has been answered.

So step up and provide the proof asked. Or dodge the question again.

According to the theory, the only space that exists is the space in the universe. There was no space before the universe, space was created when the matter of the universe expanded outward. The universe expands into nothing, the universe is enlarging and thereby expanding the space within it. This is the picture we get from deep space astronomy. We can look out in all directions and see remnants of the older, much smaller, universe.

There is no proof. There is only the fact that the theory fits the available data pretty well. As I have posted there are other theories that might explain the data.
 
Re: LOL "Big Bang"

Only a scientifically illiterate person would think that Kent Hovind has disproved the big bang theory.

Only a scientifically illiterate person would think that Kent Hovind knows anything about science, well, unless evading taxes is a science...hmmmm
 
Re: LOL "Big Bang"

Moderator's Warning:
Let's knock off the personal comments and baiting. Stick to the topic and move on.
 
re: LOL "Big Bang"[W:19,438]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D5uWkHALd0Q

While I do recommend the whole video to watch - as well as the whole video series - fast-forward to 1:16:47 that easily debunks the "Big Bang Theory."

Clinging to the notion that something came from nothing, like two atoms forming together and then BOOM, out of nowhere the universe "expanded."


"4.6 Billion years ago." LOL! Show me the evidence!
It wasn't two atoms. As for evidence, I cite the cosmic background radiation.
 
Re: LOL "Big Bang"

LOL you mad? As I said, prove to me that the universe as a whole is "13.8 billion years old." I mean wow, listen to yourself. Is that even a number in terms of age or time? Ridiculous.

.

It is a number, in terms of anything.
 
Re: LOL "Big Bang"

A "scientifically illiterate" person only needs common sense to see through such hogwash.

Sorry but meaningless equations are not to answer to everything in life.

Common yes. Sense not so much.
 
Re: LOL "Big Bang"

In it's most simple of arguments, if you believe the universe is expanding, as scientists are learning, what is it expanding into? And if you think that space beyond is infinite, as scientists suggest, then infinity reveals that God could exist, or couldn't exist. Since it can't be proved God can't exist, your question has been answered.

So step up and provide the proof asked. Or dodge the question again.
Space itself is expanding.
 
Re: LOL "Big Bang"

Prove that the universe is exactly 13.8 billion years old. LOL


Prove that it isn't.

Here, I'll help you.....

jesus-dinosaur8.jpg



:lamo









Explanation[edit]

The Lambda-CDM concordance model describes the evolution of the universe from a very uniform, hot, dense primordial state to its present state over a span of about 13.8 billion years[3] of cosmological time. This model is well understood theoretically and strongly supported by recent high-precision astronomical observations such as WMAP. In contrast, theories of the origin of the primordial state remain very speculative. If one extrapolates the Lambda-CDM model backward from the earliest well-understood state, it quickly (within a small fraction of a second) reaches a singularity called the "Big Bang singularity". This singularity is not understood as having a physical significance in the usual sense, but it is convenient to quote times measured "since the Big Bang" even though they do not correspond to a physically measurable time. For example, "10−6 seconds after the Big Bang" is a well-defined era in the universe's evolution. If one referred to the same era as "13.8 billion years minus 10−6 seconds ago," the precision of the meaning would be lost because the minuscule latter time interval is swamped by uncertainty in the former.

Though the universe might in theory have a longer history, the International Astronomical Union[4] presently use "age of the universe" to mean the duration of the Lambda-CDM expansion, or equivalently the elapsed time since the Big Bang in the current observable universe.


220px-Ilc_9yr_moll4096.png



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_universe
 
Back
Top Bottom