DDD
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2012
- Messages
- 12,351
- Reaction score
- 1,918
- Location
- Republic of Dardania
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Is anything there false? How about you refute with something of substance, childish attacks like this mean nothing if you're simply going to provide one liners as support.
Provide real references before for me to evaluate. Weak-o-pedia never counts.
Such data is hardly available due to the loose definition of what a "scientist" really is.
Then it is just a mere opinion. No one needs to take your word for it and believe that religious people are anywhere near contributing to science compared to non-religious ones. That is just an opinion while religion is not required.
The above statement is surely just an opinion, in fact, every single thing ever claimed by science is just that, an opinion based on observation. Science creates theories, not facts. (and I don't mean this in a demeaning way towards science, if you actually understood a shred of what science is, you would then also understand why everything is in reality a theory as compared to a fact, it's more a semantics kind of thing)
There are sciences that create facts such as chemistry for instance. Joint chemical substances will create another one, and the new substance then is fact. It is not a suggestion in such a case, it is a fact.
Well, first off, the Holy Spirit IS god. It's the triune god. The son of God is also God, they are all one God. Also, that's not what I necessarily meant when I said they preach other things.
Your ignorance is noted though.
There is no actual empirical evidence regarding all of those, yet ignorance is assumed on my posts.
Not vague, it is simply a level up above you in terms of conceptual/critical thinking and reading comprehension. I did that on purpose, if you can figure what that statement means then you may be able to get somewhere. As it stands, you are incapable of understanding the words of a 16 year old.
Or the statement is vague and makes no sense.