• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Why Intellectuals Laugh At Atheists

#22


Jesus never existed?

Believe it or not, there are atheists who think that the historical Jesus never existed. John Dickson deals with new atheists like Richard Dawkins (The God Delusion), Christopher Hitchens (God Is Not Great) and Michel Onfray (The Atheist Manifesto) who have argued that Jesus never exist.




 
#23


Rape Apologists

Real life 40-year old virgin Phil Mason thunderf00t (who never had a meaningful relationship with a woman... ever) was dumb enough to admit that rape doesn't occur even if it's non-consensual! This is what thunderf00t said in his video "TEACH THEM NOT TO RAPE!" (uploaded September 25, 2013), "Then you go through the transition between rape and just bad sex. And like it or not, such a transition exists. I mean, for example, 'Well, It was fully consensual to start with, but when we went at it, the sex was just awful, and at the end I asked them to stop, but they finished anyway.'"



 
#24


Resurrection Pagan Copycats?

Atheist Tim Callahan actually thinks the resurrection of Jesus is nothing more than a pagan and mythological copycat, like Isis, Dionysus, Osiris, Adonis, Attis, etc. But as historian and scholar Gary Habermas shows none of these mystery religions are like Jesus at all. Furthermore, no serious scholarly historian would say Jesus is like these mystery religions.



 
#25


Unscientific evidence of evolution

Stephen Jay Gould (an agnostic) expresses his blunt feelings and thoughts about Ernst Haeckel's famous drawings of embryos: they're false and anybody who uses them should be ashamed of themself. In fact, a real scientist would not use Haeckel's sketches to prove evolution. Well, unless, of course, you're famed atheist Richard Dawkins.

By the way, Dawkins is a staunch defender of evolution. Apparently, his desperation to prove evolution is blinding him from the facts and evidence. He thinks Haeckel's drawings are correct! He used them in his documentary The Genius of Charles Darwin.



 
#26

Lame Objections Against Resurrection of Jesus



 
#27

Rape is Arbitrary



 
#28


Contradictions are fine

Chad (the Christian who is a presuppositional apologist) debates Mike (the atheist) on the law of non-contradiction. Mike thinks that having a worldview that has contradictions in it is fine. Chad explains that such a worldview would be its undoing.



 
spam.jpg
 
#29

Jews Brought Holocaust on Themselves?


If there's ever a sick-minded person in the New Atheist movement, it would have to be Sam Harris (author of The End of Faith and Letter to a Christian Nation). This atheist actually suggests that Jews brought their troubles (from antisemitism to the Holocaust) on themselves: "The gravity of Jewish suffering over the ages, culminating in the Holocaust, makes it almost impossible to entertain any suggestion that Jews might have brought their troubles upon themselves. This is, however, in a rather narrow sense, the truth."



 
Spam! Lovely (not) Spam!!!!! What a farrago of nonsense from WooToob.
 
#30


Science Makes Impossible Possible

Listen as Richard Dawkins says science reclassifies literally anything impossible to be only improbable, thus literally anything impossible is possible! Furthermore, Lawrence Krauss and Kari Enqvist openly admit that science makes classical logic false! They don't seem to realize that they are assuming classical logic in order to make said claim. Is this what atheism has turned into?



 
Looks like the list is endless! :mrgreen:
 
Through the help of some volunteers who responded .....

Here's my contribution why intellectuals laugh at atheists.


#31

SPAM takes on a whole new meaning!


Giving a lists of reasonable reasons suddenly is......spam.


Imagine that. All they get from all that is this:


]
spam.jpg


:mrgreen:


See what I mean? They don't see reason. They don't want reason. They don't seem to understand reason.


They don't even know when they volunteered themselves as perfect examples........to support the title of this thread! :lol:


It all fits nicely in the package.

I rest my case.
 
Last edited:
It all fits nicely in the package.

The package consists of your delusions. Carry on spamming. It is amusing. No scientific studies, just crap from YouTube.
 
Being a moronic dickhead isn't limited to any theological viewpoint. True, there are lots of atheists who are unreasonable jackasses. This is also true of Christians, Jews, Muslims, Deists, Agnostics... the list goes on endlessly. The exception to this is Scientologists. They are all moronic dickheads.
 
Being a moronic dickhead isn't limited to any theological viewpoint. True, there are lots of atheists who are unreasonable jackasses. This is also true of Christians, Jews, Muslims, Deists, Agnostics... the list goes on endlessly. The exception to this is Scientologists. They are all moronic dickheads.

I agree with that. Isn't it odd that Tosca believes that if you are an intellectual then you can't be an atheist. I could post a long list of intellectual atheists but we have had enough spam.
 
I think your definition of "intellectual" needs some work champ.
 
I think your definition of "intellectual" needs some work champ.

The intellectuals they refer in the title would be those who engage in academic study or critical evaluation of ideas and issues.

As shown by the videos - which systematically explained what's laughable about atheists. Needless to say, this does not necessarily mean that all atheists are laughable.
 
Of course, a lot of atheists featured in the videos are prominent atheists - like Dawkins, Harris etc., - who are influential to a lot of atheists in the way they think, believe, and try to reason. Any forum will give you good examples of atheists who'd been influenced by these people. These are the atheists that are being laughed at, along with their "poster boys."

But that's not saying that all atheists are therefore non-thinking individuals who just follow what these prominent atheists say.
 
Last edited:
I haven't seen the videos so I can't say. Somewhere around here, though, is an atheist humor thread where every anti religious and anti Christian meme and photoshopped Internet pic is heartily appreciated and immediately liked.

Glass houses must be a bitch to keep clean.

I was actually gonna ask, this MUST be in response to something?


This finger poking, kids in the back seat annoying each other crap isn't usually Tosca's bag...


But you gotta give what you get, sometimes.
 
Of course, a lot of atheists featured in the videos are prominent atheists - like Dawkins, Harris etc., - who are influential to a lot of atheists in the way they think, believe, and try to reason. Any forum will give you good examples of atheists who'd been influenced by these people. These are the atheists that are being laughed at, along with their "poster boys."

But that's not saying that all atheists are therefore non-thinking individuals who just follow what these prominent atheists say.

You know, as one thread earlier this week pointed out, it's entirely possible that it's IMPOSSIBLE to be an atheist. Agnostic? You bet. Atheist? Maybe not so much.
 
Back
Top Bottom