Why is it so essential for Christian to enforced 'God Loves You' with non-Christians?

tosca1 · Oct 25, 2014

Re: Why is it so essential for Christian to enforced 'God Loves You' with non-Christi

Tuatara said:
Could you imagine the stink if I or any other atheist went around telling other people's children that there was no god and actively pursued this agressively say like a missionary.

Oh, that's been happening for quite a while now.

Why should we have to listen to atheists and secularists spew their own preachings against religion and God?

Look at the books written to malign religion - especially Christianity. They even try to indoctrinate our children to that mentality, to accept the secular values.....

zyzygy · Oct 25, 2014

Re: Why is it so essential for Christian to enforced 'God Loves You' with non-Christi

tosca1 said:
Oh, that's been happening for quite a while now.

Why should we have to listen to atheists and secularists spew their own preachings against religion and God?

Look at the books written to malign religion - especially Christianity. They even try to indoctrinate our children to that mentality, to accept the secular values.....

William Rea · Oct 25, 2014

Re: Why is it so essential for Christian to enforced 'God Loves You' with non-Christi

zyzygy said:
View attachment 67174955

Little morsels of humanity just waiting to be filled with hate and bigotry.

tosca1 · Oct 25, 2014

Re: Why is it so essential for Christian to enforced 'God Loves You' with non-Christi

zyzygy said:
View attachment 67174955

Not surprising.

Why do you think "progressive" societies would love to have our children in institution-like places like, subsidized "universal daycares?"

Secularism takes from the pages of Communism.

We must create out of the younger generation a generation of Communists. We must turn children, who can be shaped like wax, into real, good Communists.... We must remove the children from the crude influence of their families. We must take them over and, to speak frankly, nationalize them. From the first days of their lives they will be under the healthy influence of Communist children's nurseries and schools. There they will grow up to be real Communists. - Communism Party Education Workers Congress

Give me four years to teach the children and the seed I have sown will never be uprooted. - Lenin

The education of all children, from the moment that they can get along without a mother's care, shall be in state institutions at state expense.
- Marx

Education is a weapon, whose effect depends on who holds it in his hands and at whom it is aimed.
- Stalin

zyzygy · Oct 25, 2014

Re: Why is it so essential for Christian to enforced 'God Loves You' with non-Christi

tosca1 said:
Not surprising.

Why do you think "progressive" societies would love to have our children in institution-like places like, subsidized "universal daycares?"

Secularism takes from the pages of Communism.

We must create out of the younger generation a generation of Communists. We must turn children, who can be shaped like wax, into real, good Communists.... We must remove the children from the crude influence of their families. We must take them over and, to speak frankly, nationalize them. From the first days of their lives they will be under the healthy influence of Communist children's nurseries and schools. There they will grow up to be real Communists. - Communism Party Education Workers Congress

Give me four years to teach the children and the seed I have sown will never be uprooted. - Lenin

The education of all children, from the moment that they can get along without a mother's care, shall be in state institutions at state expense.
- Marx

Education is a weapon, whose effect depends on who holds it in his hands and at whom it is aimed.
- Stalin

Do you think that baby Hindus are spawn of the anti-christ? And brainwashing children into christianity is acceptable? I am against the brainwashing of children, they should be allowed to make up their own minds when they are mature enough.

William Rea · Oct 25, 2014

Re: Why is it so essential for Christian to enforced 'God Loves You' with non-Christi

tosca1 said:
Not surprising.

Why do you think "progressive" societies would love to have our children in institution-like places like, subsidized "universal daycares?"

Secularism takes from the pages of Communism.

We must create out of the younger generation a generation of Communists. We must turn children, who can be shaped like wax, into real, good Communists.... We must remove the children from the crude influence of their families. We must take them over and, to speak frankly, nationalize them. From the first days of their lives they will be under the healthy influence of Communist children's nurseries and schools. There they will grow up to be real Communists. - Communism Party Education Workers Congress

Give me four years to teach the children and the seed I have sown will never be uprooted. - Lenin

The education of all children, from the moment that they can get along without a mother's care, shall be in state institutions at state expense.
- Marx

Education is a weapon, whose effect depends on who holds it in his hands and at whom it is aimed.
- Stalin

Nice strawman you built there.

William Rea · Oct 25, 2014

Re: Why is it so essential for Christian to enforced 'God Loves You' with non-Christi

zyzygy said:
Do you think that baby Hindus are spawn of the anti-christ? And brainwashing children into christianity is acceptable? I am against the brainwashing of children, they should be allowed to make up their own minds when they are mature enough.

No, the rules of the entitlement culture are primarily that they must never be allowed to make up their own mind, ever! So they fight as dirty as it needs to get to keep their religious bullcrap ingrained in the host culture, they are the human equivalent of the Hymenoepimecis argyraphaga.

tosca1 · Oct 25, 2014

Re: Why is it so essential for Christian to enforced 'God Loves You' with non-Christi

zyzygy said:
Do you think that baby Hindus are spawn of the anti-christ? And brainwashing children into christianity is acceptable? I am against the brainwashing of children, they should be allowed to make up their own minds when they are mature enough.

Pure rant! Obviously biased. Double standard.

csbrown28 · Oct 25, 2014

Re: Why is it so essential for Christian to enforced 'God Loves You' with non-Christi

tosca1 said:
Not surprising.

Why do you think "progressive" societies would love to have our children in institution-like places like, subsidized "universal daycares?"

Secularism takes from the pages of Communism.

We must create out of the younger generation a generation of Communists. We must turn children, who can be shaped like wax, into real, good Communists.... We must remove the children from the crude influence of their families. We must take them over and, to speak frankly, nationalize them. From the first days of their lives they will be under the healthy influence of Communist children's nurseries and schools. There they will grow up to be real Communists. - Communism Party Education Workers Congress

Give me four years to teach the children and the seed I have sown will never be uprooted. - Lenin

The education of all children, from the moment that they can get along without a mother's care, shall be in state institutions at state expense.
- Marx

Education is a weapon, whose effect depends on who holds it in his hands and at whom it is aimed.
- Stalin

Assuming you've read some of my many opinions on religion and god, would it surprise you to know that I have never told my children (they are 10 and 11) that god does not exist?

William Rea · Oct 25, 2014

Re: Why is it so essential for Christian to enforced 'God Loves You' with non-Christi

csbrown28 said:
Assuming you've read some of my many opinions on religion and god, would it surprise you to know that I have never told my children (they are 10 and 11) that god does not exist?

No it wouldn't, I did exactly the same, I let them decide for themselves.

Not once in their 16 and 18 years respectively have I forced any religion or non-religion on them.

tosca1 · Oct 25, 2014

Re: Why is it so essential for Christian to enforced 'God Loves You' with non-Christi

csbrown28 said:
Assuming you've read some of my many opinions on religion and god, would it surprise you to know that I have never told my children (they are 10 and 11) that god does not exist?

No, that wouldn't surprise me at all. Same way that it wouldn't surprise me to know that there are Chrsitians who'd never properly introduced their children to the faith - who hold the view that they'll let their children choose their own spirituality.

csbrown28 · Oct 25, 2014

Re: Why is it so essential for Christian to enforced 'God Loves You' with non-Christi

tosca1 said:
No, that wouldn't surprise me at all.

So then why all the vitriol about atheists spewing their non-belief?

Does that mean I'm an "improper atheist"?

I mean clearly, I am outspoken about my ideas and most outspoken Christians would introduce their children to the idea that god exists.

zyzygy · Oct 25, 2014

Re: Why is it so essential for Christian to enforced 'God Loves You' with non-Christi

csbrown28 said:
So then why all the vitriol about atheists spewing their non-belief?

Some branches of the christian cult encourage that.

zyzygy · Oct 25, 2014

Re: Why is it so essential for Christian to enforced 'God Loves You' with non-Christi

tosca1 said:
Pure rant! Obviously biased. Double standard.

An obvious dodge. All children are born as atheists. You know that too.

csbrown28 · Oct 25, 2014

Re: Why is it so essential for Christian to enforced 'God Loves You' with non-Christi

zyzygy said:
Some branches of the christian cult encourage that.

Sure, but Idon't think he is being genuine when he claims that atheists try to prosthiatize their beliefs, but not be surprised that, as an outspoken atheist, that I don't prosthitize to my own children.

zyzygy · Oct 25, 2014

Re: Why is it so essential for Christian to enforced 'God Loves You' with non-Christi

csbrown28 said:
Assuming you've read some of my many opinions on religion and god, would it surprise you to know that I have never told my children (they are 10 and 11) that god does not exist?

Me neither. I let them make up their own mind. I even let them attend Catholic schools. They rejected religion. They were smart enough to see through the nonsense.

zyzygy · Oct 25, 2014

Re: Why is it so essential for Christian to enforced 'God Loves You' with non-Christi

tosca1 said:
No, that wouldn't surprise me at all. Same way that it wouldn't surprise me to know that there are Chrsitians who'd never properly introduced their children to the faith - who hold the view that they'll let their children choose their own spirituality.

Then why all the anti-atheist verbiage? We all have to live on the same planet. You must accept that many people do not believe in a god.

tosca1 · Oct 25, 2014

Re: Why is it so essential for Christian to enforced 'God Loves You' with non-Christi

csbrown28 said:
So then why all the vitriol about atheists spewing their non-belief?

Does that mean I'm an "improper atheist"?

I mean clearly, I am outspoken about my ideas and most outspoken Christians would introduce their children to the idea that god exists.

Have I used you as an example in any way to be the representatives of all atheists and secularists?

Are you saying there are no atheists who spew their vitriol towards believers, and religion?

As an example, have you heard of that so-called scientist named, Richard Dawkins? His book about The God Delusion?

csbrown28 · Oct 25, 2014

Re: Why is it so essential for Christian to enforced 'God Loves You' with non-Christi

zyzygy said:
An obvious dodge. All children are born as atheists. You know that too.

Friad I'm going to have to disagree with this one.

Babies lack the cognitive ability to contemplate the existence of god. An atheist is a person who denies that god exists. An informed atheist would probably add that his lack of belief is based on a lack of evidence.

Babies, imo, are simply non-believers. hat they believe is determined by their nature and their nurture.

Atheists are much more likely (though certainly not all) to teach their children a practical method of thinking based on evidence, rather then try to indoctrinate them with ideas based on the ideas the parent (teacher) holds.

How many Christian children have been shunned or worse, disowned by their parents because they didn't believe in god, or acted in a way that was contrary to Christian teaching?

tosca1 · Oct 25, 2014

Re: Why is it so essential for Christian to enforced 'God Loves You' with non-Christi

csbrown28 said:
So then why all the vitriol about atheists spewing their non-belief?

Care to read the title of this topic....

Why is it so essential for Christian to enforced 'God Loves You' with non-Christians?

Have you read some of the comments from atheists? Why all this fuss about Christians saying, God loves you?

William Rea · Oct 25, 2014

Re: Why is it so essential for Christian to enforced 'God Loves You' with non-Christi

tosca1 said:
Have I used you as an example in any way to be the representatives of all atheists and secularists?

Are you saying there are no atheists who spew their vitriol towards believers, and religion?

As an example, have you heard of that so-called scientist named, Richard Dawkins? His book about The God Delusion?

Yeah, too right, what kind of scientist publishes crap like this...

Books[edit]
Dawkins, R. (1976). The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-286092-5.
Dawkins, R. (1982). The Extended Phenotype. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-288051-9.
Dawkins, R. (1986). The Blind Watchmaker. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 0-393-31570-3.
Dawkins, R. (1995). River Out of Eden. New York: Basic Books. ISBN 0-465-06990-8.
Dawkins, R. (1996). Climbing Mount Improbable. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 0-393-31682-3.
Dawkins, R. (1998). Unweaving the Rainbow. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. ISBN 0-618-05673-4.
Dawkins, R. (2003). A Devil's Chaplain. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. ISBN 0-618-33540-4.
Dawkins, R. (2004). The Ancestor's Tale. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. ISBN 0-618-00583-8.
Dawkins, R. (2006). The God Delusion. New York: Bantam Books. ISBN 0-618-68000-4.
Dawkins, R. (2007). Richard Dawkins: How a Scientist Changed the Way We Think. New York: Bantam Books. ISBN 0199214662.
Various (2008). Richard Dawkins, ed. The Oxford Book of Modern Science Writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-921680-0.
Dawkins, R. (2009). The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution. Free Press (United States), Transworld (United Kingdom and Commonwealth). ISBN 0-593-06173-X.
Dawkins, R. (2011). The Magic of Reality: How We Know What's Really True. Free Press (United States), Bantam Press (United Kingdom). ISBN 1-4391-9281-2. OCLC 709673132.
Dawkins, R. (2013). An Appetite for Wonder: The Making of a Scientist. Bantam Press (United States and United Kingdom). ISBN 0593070895.
Popular articles[edit]
Dawkins, R. (December 1992). "Is god a computer virus?". New Statesman 5 (233): 42–45.
Dawkins, R. (June 1993). "Meet my cousin, the chimpanzee". New Scientist 138 (1876): 36–38.
Dawkins, R. (1993). "Viruses of the Mind". Free Inquiry: 34–41.
Dawkins, R. (September 1995). "The Evolved Imagination". Natural History 104 (9): 8.
Dawkins, R. (November 1995). "God's Utility Function". Scientific American 273 (5): 80–85. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1195-80.
Dawkins, R. (10 April 1999). "Snake Oil and Holy Water". Forbes: 235+.
Dawkins, R. (2 October 2000). "Hall of Mirrors". Forbes: 273.
Dawkins, R. (January 2001). "What is science good for?". Harvard Business Review 79 (1): 159–63, 178. PMID 11189460.
Dawkins, R. (2004-09-11). "Gerin Oil". Free Inquiry.
Dawkins, R. (2005-02-19). "The Giant Tortoise's Tale". The Guardian (London).
Dawkins, R. (2005-02-26). "The Turtle's Tale". The Guardian (London).
Dawkins, R. (2005-05-21). "God's Gift to Kansas". The Times (London).
Dawkins, R. "The Lava Lizard's Tale". The Guardian (London)....

William Rea · Oct 25, 2014

Re: Why is it so essential for Christian to enforced 'God Loves You' with non-Christi

Dawkins, R.; Dawkins, R; Noble, D; Yudkin, M (2007). "Genes still central". New Scientist 196 (2634): 18–18. doi:10.1016/S0262-4079(07)63136-4.
Krauss, L.M.; Dawkins, R. (2007). "Should science speak to faith?". Scientific American 297 (1): 88–91. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0707-88. PMID 17695847.
Dawkins, R. (2008). "The group delusion". New Scientist 197 (2638): 17. doi:10.1016/S0262-4079(08)60086-X.
Dawkins, R. (2008). "The evolution of altruism – what matters is gene selection". New Scientist 197 (2638): 17–17. doi:10.1016/S0262-4079(08)60086-X.
Academic papers[edit]
1960s[edit]
Dawkins, R. (1968). "The ontogeny of a pecking preference in domestic chicks". Z Tierpsychol 25 (2): 170–186. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1968.tb00011.x. PMID 5684149.
Dawkins, R. (1969). "Bees Are Easily Distracted". Science 165 (3895): 751–751. doi:10.1126/science.165.3895.751. PMID 17742255.
1970s[edit]
Dawkins, R. (1971). "Selective neurone death as a possible memory mechanism". Nature 229 (5280): 118–119. doi:10.1038/229118a0.
Dawkins, R. (1976). "Growing points in ethology". In Bateson, P.P.G. and Hinde, R.A. Hierarchical organization: A candidate principle for ethology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dawkins, R.; Carlisle, T.R. (1976). "Parental investment, mate desertion and a fallacy". Nature 262 (5564): 131–133. doi:10.1038/262131a0.
Treisman, M.; Dawkins, R. (1976). "The "cost of meiosis": is there any?". Journal of Theoretical Biology (London: Academic Press) 63 (2): 479–484. doi:10.1016/0022-5193(76)90047-3. PMID 1011857.
Dawkins, R. (1976). "Universal Darwinism". In Bendall, D.S. Evolution from Molecules to Men. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 403–425.
Dawkins R (1978). "Replicator selection and the extended phenotype". Z Tierpsychol 47 (1): 61–76. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1978.tb01823.x. PMID 696023.
Dawkins, R.; Krebs, J.R. (1978). "Animal signals: information or manipulation". Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications. pp. 282–309.
Dawkins, R. (1979). "Twelve Misunderstandings of Kin Selection". Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 51: 184–200. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1979.tb00682.x.
Dawkins, R.; Krebs, J.R. (1979). "Arms races between and within species". Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 205 (1161): 489–511. doi:10.1098/rspb.1979.0081. PMID 42057.
Brockmann, H.J.; Dawkins, R.; Grafen A. (1979). "Joint nesting in a digger wasp as an evolutionarily stable preadaptation to social life". Behaviour (London: Academic Press) 71 (3): 203–244. doi:10.1163/156853979X00179.
Dawkins, Richard; Brockmann, H.J.; Grafen, A. (1979). "Evolutionarily stable nesting strategy in a digger wasp". Journal of Theoretical Biology 77 (4): 473–496. doi:10.1016/0022-5193(79)90021-3. PMID 491692.
1980s[edit]
Dawkins, R. (1980). "Good strategy or evolutionarily stable strategy". In Barlow, G.W. and Silverberg, J. Sociobiology: Beyond Nature/Nurture?. Colorado: Westview Press. pp. 331–337. ISBN 0-89158-960-0.
Dawkins, Richard; Brockmann, H.J. (1980). "Do digger wasps commit the concorde fallacy?". Animal Behaviour 28 (3): 892–896. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(80)80149-7.
Dawkins, Richard (1981). "In defence of selfish genes". Philosophy 56 (218): 556–573. doi:10.1017/S0031819100050580.
Krebs, J.R.; Dawkins, R. (1984). "Animal signals: mind-reading and manipulation". In Krebs, J. R. and Davies, N.B. Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications. pp. 380–402. ISBN 0-632-02702-9.
1990s[edit]
Dawkins, R. (1990). "Parasites, desiderata lists and the paradox of the organism". Parasitology. 100. Suppl: S63–73. PMID 2235064.
Dawkins, R. (June 1991). "Evolution on the Mind". Nature 351 (6329): 686–686. doi:10.1038/351686c0.
Hurst, L.D.; Dawkins, R. (May 1992). "Evolutionary Chemistry: Life in a Test Tube". Nature 357 (6375): 198–199. doi:10.1038/357198a0. PMID 1375346.
Dawkins, R. (1994). "Evolutionary biology. The eye in a twinkling". Nature 368 (6473): 690–691. doi:10.1038/368690a0. PMID 8152479.
Dawkins, R. (September 1995). "The Evolved Imagination". Natural History 104 (9): 8.
Dawkins, R. (December 1994). "Burying The Vehicle". Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (4): 616–617. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00036207.[dead link]
Dawkins, R.; Holliday, Robin (August 1997). "Religion and Science". BioEssays 19 (8): 743–743. doi:10.1002/bies.950190817.
Dawkins, R. (1997). "The Pope's message on evolution: Obscurantism to the rescue". The Quarterly Review of Biology 72 (4): 397–399. doi:10.1086/419951.
Dawkins, R. (1998). "Postmodernism Disrobed". Nature 394 (6689): 141–143. doi:10.1038/28089.
Dawkins, R. (1998). "Arresting evidence". Sciences (New York) 38 (6): 20–5. PMID 11657757.
2000s[edit]
Dawkins, R. (2000). "W. D. Hamilton memorial". Nature 405 (6788): 733. doi:10.1038/35015793.
Dawkins, R. (2002). "Should doctors be Darwinian?". Transactions of the Medical Society of London 119: 15–30. PMID 17184029.
Blakemore C, Dawkins R, Noble D, Yudkin M (2003). "Is a scientific boycott ever justified?". Nature 421 (6921): 314–314. doi:10.1038/421314b. PMID 12540875.
Dawkins, R. (2003). "The evolution of evolvability". On Growth, Form and Computers. London: Academic Press.
Dawkins, R. (2004). "Viruses of the mind". In Warburton, N. Philosophy: Basic Readings. New York: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-33798-4.
Dawkins, R. (June 2004). "Extended phenotype - But not too extended. A reply to Laland, Turner and Jablonka". Biology & Philosophy 19 (3): 377–396. doi:10.1023/B:BIPH.0000036180.14904.96.

I tell you, that guy has no right whatsoever to call himself a Scientist.

tosca1 · Oct 25, 2014

Re: Why is it so essential for Christian to enforced 'God Loves You' with non-Christi

zyzygy said:
We all have to live on the same planet. You must accept that many people do not believe in a god.

Well, I wish you'd ask that of Richard Dawkins and his ilks - the New Atheists. And all the atheists in this rally. And all the atheists who agrees with him.

Have you castigated them for being bigots and intolerant?

We all have to live on the same planet. They must accept that many people do believe in a god.

tosca1 · Oct 25, 2014

Re: Why is it so essential for Christian to enforced 'God Loves You' with non-Christi

William Rea said:
Dawkins, R.; Dawkins, R; Noble, D; Yudkin, M (2007). "Genes still central". New Scientist 196 (2634): 18–18. doi:10.1016/S0262-4079(07)63136-4.
Krauss, L.M.; Dawkins, R. (2007). "Should science speak to faith?". Scientific American 297 (1): 88–91. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0707-88. PMID 17695847.
Dawkins, R. (2008). "The group delusion". New Scientist 197 (2638): 17. doi:10.1016/S0262-4079(08)60086-X.
Dawkins, R. (2008). "The evolution of altruism – what matters is gene selection". New Scientist 197 (2638): 17–17. doi:10.1016/S0262-4079(08)60086-X.
Academic papers[edit]
1960s[edit]
Dawkins, R. (1968). "The ontogeny of a pecking preference in domestic chicks". Z Tierpsychol 25 (2): 170–186. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1968.tb00011.x. PMID 5684149.
Dawkins, R. (1969). "Bees Are Easily Distracted". Science 165 (3895): 751–751. doi:10.1126/science.165.3895.751. PMID 17742255.
1970s[edit]
Dawkins, R. (1971). "Selective neurone death as a possible memory mechanism". Nature 229 (5280): 118–119. doi:10.1038/229118a0.
Dawkins, R. (1976). "Growing points in ethology". In Bateson, P.P.G. and Hinde, R.A. Hierarchical organization: A candidate principle for ethology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dawkins, R.; Carlisle, T.R. (1976). "Parental investment, mate desertion and a fallacy". Nature 262 (5564): 131–133. doi:10.1038/262131a0.
Treisman, M.; Dawkins, R. (1976). "The "cost of meiosis": is there any?". Journal of Theoretical Biology (London: Academic Press) 63 (2): 479–484. doi:10.1016/0022-5193(76)90047-3. PMID 1011857.
Dawkins, R. (1976). "Universal Darwinism". In Bendall, D.S. Evolution from Molecules to Men. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 403–425.
Dawkins R (1978). "Replicator selection and the extended phenotype". Z Tierpsychol 47 (1): 61–76. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1978.tb01823.x. PMID 696023.
Dawkins, R.; Krebs, J.R. (1978). "Animal signals: information or manipulation". Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications. pp. 282–309.
Dawkins, R. (1979). "Twelve Misunderstandings of Kin Selection". Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 51: 184–200. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1979.tb00682.x.
Dawkins, R.; Krebs, J.R. (1979). "Arms races between and within species". Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 205 (1161): 489–511. doi:10.1098/rspb.1979.0081. PMID 42057.
Brockmann, H.J.; Dawkins, R.; Grafen A. (1979). "Joint nesting in a digger wasp as an evolutionarily stable preadaptation to social life". Behaviour (London: Academic Press) 71 (3): 203–244. doi:10.1163/156853979X00179.
Dawkins, Richard; Brockmann, H.J.; Grafen, A. (1979). "Evolutionarily stable nesting strategy in a digger wasp". Journal of Theoretical Biology 77 (4): 473–496. doi:10.1016/0022-5193(79)90021-3. PMID 491692.
1980s[edit]
Dawkins, R. (1980). "Good strategy or evolutionarily stable strategy". In Barlow, G.W. and Silverberg, J. Sociobiology: Beyond Nature/Nurture?. Colorado: Westview Press. pp. 331–337. ISBN 0-89158-960-0.
Dawkins, Richard; Brockmann, H.J. (1980). "Do digger wasps commit the concorde fallacy?". Animal Behaviour 28 (3): 892–896. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(80)80149-7.
Dawkins, Richard (1981). "In defence of selfish genes". Philosophy 56 (218): 556–573. doi:10.1017/S0031819100050580.
Krebs, J.R.; Dawkins, R. (1984). "Animal signals: mind-reading and manipulation". In Krebs, J. R. and Davies, N.B. Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications. pp. 380–402. ISBN 0-632-02702-9.
1990s[edit]
Dawkins, R. (1990). "Parasites, desiderata lists and the paradox of the organism". Parasitology. 100. Suppl: S63–73. PMID 2235064.
Dawkins, R. (June 1991). "Evolution on the Mind". Nature 351 (6329): 686–686. doi:10.1038/351686c0.
Hurst, L.D.; Dawkins, R. (May 1992). "Evolutionary Chemistry: Life in a Test Tube". Nature 357 (6375): 198–199. doi:10.1038/357198a0. PMID 1375346.
Dawkins, R. (1994). "Evolutionary biology. The eye in a twinkling". Nature 368 (6473): 690–691. doi:10.1038/368690a0. PMID 8152479.
Dawkins, R. (September 1995). "The Evolved Imagination". Natural History 104 (9): 8.
Dawkins, R. (December 1994). "Burying The Vehicle". Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (4): 616–617. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00036207.[dead link]
Dawkins, R.; Holliday, Robin (August 1997). "Religion and Science". BioEssays 19 (8): 743–743. doi:10.1002/bies.950190817.
Dawkins, R. (1997). "The Pope's message on evolution: Obscurantism to the rescue". The Quarterly Review of Biology 72 (4): 397–399. doi:10.1086/419951.
Dawkins, R. (1998). "Postmodernism Disrobed". Nature 394 (6689): 141–143. doi:10.1038/28089.
Dawkins, R. (1998). "Arresting evidence". Sciences (New York) 38 (6): 20–5. PMID 11657757.
2000s[edit]
Dawkins, R. (2000). "W. D. Hamilton memorial". Nature 405 (6788): 733. doi:10.1038/35015793.
Dawkins, R. (2002). "Should doctors be Darwinian?". Transactions of the Medical Society of London 119: 15–30. PMID 17184029.
Blakemore C, Dawkins R, Noble D, Yudkin M (2003). "Is a scientific boycott ever justified?". Nature 421 (6921): 314–314. doi:10.1038/421314b. PMID 12540875.
Dawkins, R. (2003). "The evolution of evolvability". On Growth, Form and Computers. London: Academic Press.
Dawkins, R. (2004). "Viruses of the mind". In Warburton, N. Philosophy: Basic Readings. New York: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-33798-4.
Dawkins, R. (June 2004). "Extended phenotype - But not too extended. A reply to Laland, Turner and Jablonka". Biology & Philosophy 19 (3): 377–396. doi:10.1023/B:BIPH.0000036180.14904.96.

I tell you, that guy has no right whatsoever to call himself a Scientist.

Wow. Quite a long list.

Too bad he threw all his credibility away for religion.

Ironic isn't it? :lol:

Personally, I think he's finally lost his marbles - he's what you'd call "THE MAD scientist."
I'd like to see him with a bad hair day! :mrgreen:

William Rea · Oct 25, 2014

Re: Why is it so essential for Christian to enforced 'God Loves You' with non-Christi

tosca1 said:
Too bad he threw all his credibility away for religion. Ironic isn't it? :lol:

Not in the least. The record speaks for itself my dear.

He is however only one of a myriad of Scientists who have made similar or greater contributions.