• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Let the force be with you

zyzygy said:
No. There are no positrons in an atom. A positron is an anti-electron - it's antimatter. It will combine with an electron when it can (pretty much as soon as it can) in mutual annihilation. Both it (the positron) and the electron will have their entire mass converted into energy. In translation, that means a positron (antimatter) will not survive in a "regular" matter universe. It won't exist here with us for very long. So not much understanding of physics.
Click to expand...
And YOUR understanding of physics leaves much to be desired, If thereis any.
 
RGacky3 said:
1. Based on what ... you're udnerstanding of cosmology? Or just guessing?

2. God is by definition, uncreated, he's the ground of all being, so it's a nonsensicle question.

3. No believes in a dude With a gray beard looking Down on us.

4. Yes there are some dumb religious People, there are dumb atheists as well ... so what?

5. No .... you won't.

6. So what?

7. You have absolutely NO way of showing that, and 0 evidence for that.

8. you do realize biblical scholarship has been done for centuries, and historical Jesus studies for over a Century now ... and yes, the WRITERS of the gospel interpreted Jesus throught the Hebrew bible ... and what? that's how anceint history Works, ancient historians ALWAYS interpreted important People in the religio-cultural context they lived in.
Click to expand...
Apparently you have no answers just disagreements It is called "Finding fault" I am simply explaining my experiences, knowlege and understanding, if you disagree show the alternative, don't just deny.
 
doniston said:
thank you. too long didn't read would have been much clearer. (they are likely to have that problem with a lot of my posts. completeness is my thing)
Click to expand...

It's ok to do posts like that. I can't speak for anyone else but I generally go on DebatePolitics between activities or classes so reading and fully analyzing before responding to huge texts can be a little hard.

Anyways, like I said, welcome to DP, we discuss anything and everything! :D
 
doniston said:
And YOUR understanding of physics leaves much to be desired, If thereis any.
Click to expand...

There are no positrons in a computer, you were wrong. Have you ever studied physics? I have.
 
doniston said:
Apparently you have no answers just disagreements It is called "Finding fault" I am simply explaining my experiences, knowlege and understanding, if you disagree show the alternative, don't just deny.
Click to expand...

1. The Universe had a begining, an absolute begining according to most modern cosmologists, I'm not a cosmologist so I tend to defer.

2. This is basic theology and has been known for thousands of years.

3. Again, basic theology.

4. Yes it's finding fault in this one, but you're the one trashing religious People by pointing out the dumb ones amung them.

6. Again, you're making a point that doesn't really matter when it comes to religion.

7. There is no answer here, the answer is you're full of ****, you're saying that aleins are among us, og Ahead, and prove it ...

8. Again, the answer here is that the gospels give us historically accurate information about Jesus, some of it is theologized, some of it is historical.
 
Dragonfly said:
Erm.....how old are you? Where did you go to school?

Many universes?

"We know there are billions of universes"????????

We know that do we?
Click to expand...
That was in the prelude, I'm 85
Minnesota, California and school of hard knocks
Most of us do, if we watch the news, and pay attention to science.
 
doniston said:
That was in the prelude, I'm 85
Minnesota, California and school of hard knocks
Most of us do, if we watch the news, and pay attention to science.
Click to expand...

Where is it stated, factually speaking, that it is "known" that there are billions of universes?

Are you confusing galaxies with universes perhaps?
 
.
Paleocon said:
Look, I can't help it if you're clueless, but electrons and positrons annihilate with the release of energy when they come in contact.
Click to expand...
Speaking of cluelessness, are you sure of your facts, add Protons and negatrons into the mix, then reconsider
 
zyzygy said:
There are no positrons in a computer, you were wrong. Have you ever studied physics? I have.
Click to expand...
apparently you haven't studied English or your comprehension is simply weak. I didn't say "OR DENY" that there were positrons in a computer. You are the one who keeps bringing up the computer. not I
 
There really needs to be a limit on number of words in posting...z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z
 
RGacky3 said:
1. The Universe had a begining, an absolute begining according to most modern cosmologists, I'm not a cosmologist so I tend to defer.

2. This is basic theology and has been known for thousands of years.

3. Again, basic theology.

4. Yes it's finding fault in this one, but you're the one trashing religious People by pointing out the dumb ones amung them.

6. Again, you're making a point that doesn't really matter when it comes to religion.

7. There is no answer here, the answer is you're full of ****, you're saying that aleins are among us, og Ahead, and prove it ...

8. Again, the answer here is that the gospels give us historically accurate information about Jesus, some of it is theologized, some of it is historical.
Click to expand...
VERY GOOD< (You're learning) Now you've given me something to work with.

1. we are in agreement on this
2 & 3, My beliefs are based on Science, with solid evidence behind it, your's is base on theory, supposition, stories, and simple faith. Not withstanding verified facts from the Bible and relative evidence that certain Biblical stories are relatively true.----- fine , to each his own, The man with the grey beard is oftimes depicted
4. You are wrong, I was pointing out my differnces of opinion with so-called Christians, not making fun of them or calling them dumb or stupid. apparently you have a very thin skin.
6. Your SO WHAT? told me nothing of the content you were disputing
7. There is a great deal of evidence that they are, or have been here and the possibility that they may have propigated us or at least had a hand in it. regardless, these are my beliefs, I need not prove they are accurate, nor you, that your God is real.
8. what you are saying is accurate as far as it goes, but it does not actually prove a great deal, only that there were great writers back then.

Actually what you need to understand is that I am not trying to "PROVE" anything. these are my BELIEFS that I am imparting, NOTHING MORE
 
Dragonfly said:
Where is it stated, factually speaking, that it is "known" that there are billions of universes?

Are you confusing galaxies with universes perhaps?
Click to expand...
If you watch scientific programs you will know where the information comes from, much of it is still theory. as for the second, The Milky way is a galaxy within the known universe, the new telescopes are showing the exisstence of many universes, I don't know who they determined that. there is also the String theory which depicts numerous universes
 
doniston said:
VERY GOOD< (You're learning) Now you've given me something to work with.

1. we are in agreement on this
2 & 3, My beliefs are based on Science, with solid evidence behind it, your's is base on theory, supposition, stories, and simple faith. Not withstanding verified facts from the Bible and relative evidence that certain Biblical stories are relatively true.----- fine , to each his own, The man with the grey beard is oftimes depicted
4. You are wrong, I was pointing out my differnces of opinion with so-called Christians, not making fun of them or calling them dumb or stupid. apparently you have a very thin skin.
6. Your SO WHAT? told me nothing of the content you were disputing
7. There is a great deal of evidence that they are, or have been here and the possibility that they may have propigated us or at least had a hand in it. regardless, these are my beliefs, I need not prove they are accurate, nor you, that your God is real.
8. what you are saying is accurate as far as it goes, but it does not actually prove a great deal, only that there were great writers back then.

Actually what you need to understand is that I am not trying to "PROVE" anything. these are my BELIEFS that I am imparting, NOTHING MORE
Click to expand...

2 & 3: What science? The big bang theory is pretty solid science.

As far as the man With the grey beard, Yeah ... he's depicted that way ... and wisdom is depicted as a woman, but never in theology has anyone actually thought God was actually a guy With a grey beard in the sky.

4. Who are these Christians? they are the tiny tiny minority of them who believe in 6 day creationism, and certainly not any of the theologians.

6. My point is what does whether or not the flood was glocal have anything to do With religion?

7. What evidence .... go head.

8. Actually it does, the New testament documents as well as plenty of other evidence shows that Jesus was a real person and the gospels give us accurate information about his life.

If you arn't trying to prove anything, and just giving Your hair brained beliefs With NO evidence whatsoever ... you're wasting everyone's time ...
 
Dragonfly said:
Please provide a link or two to this claim.

Discovery of alternate universes is not something I'm reading about.
Click to expand...
Point1, Did you read what I said??? It came off of TV News and scientific programs, NO LINKS

Second. You have never heard if String theory (alternate universes)??? Wherehave you been??
 
doniston said:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SAbJjktk7E

Second. You have never heard if String theory (alternate universes)??? Wherehave you been??
Click to expand...

Point 3. String theory is a theory. There is no actual proof of alternate universes. The Many Worlds Theory is merely a theory too, nobody knows if it is reality.
 
doniston said:
. Speaking of cluelessness, are you sure of your facts, add Protons and negatrons into the mix, then reconsider
Click to expand...

negatron
expressing denial or refusal; saying "no"
Did you see the game yesterday? negatron.
 
doniston said:
If you watch scientific programs you will know where the information comes from, much of it is still theory. as for the second, The Milky way is a galaxy within the known universe, the new telescopes are showing the exisstence of many universes, I don't know who they determined that. there is also the String theory which depicts numerous universes
Click to expand...

My italics. Are you confusing universes with galaxies? No telescope has yet shown us another universe. How did you get that idea from watching your scientific programs?
 
I must apologize for getting two posters mixed up.
 
doniston said:
Point1, Did you read what I said??? It came off of TV News and scientific programs, NO LINKS
Click to expand...

No links? What a surprise. Name one of these scientific programs.
 
Zyzygy,

I'm beginning to think doniston may be a POE. With his incoherent babbling about positrons being in atoms, proven multiple universes, and some brand new particle called the negatron, he's gotten us on the same side of an argument.

He can't really be this clueless.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom