• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Atheist Evolution is racist.

If I were black I would be proud of the fact that our species evolved in Africa.
 
Actually the Big Bang is the very beginning of evolution.

The Big Bang is the Creation Day.

Without the BB there would not be evolution, but the two events are so distantly separated in time that most do not relate the two as conjoined events.
 
First - evolution being the work of God is fine and not racist because God created all people as equal.

Taking the Creator God out of the "evolution" has that theory as racist indeed.

The thing is that the claim that evolution is just some happen-chance or non-Godly event is thereby claiming that the African people are the lower evolved while the white race is the highest evolve.

This makes so the Atheist idea of evolution is just a new guise of the never ending racism, and that is also the motivation for keeping God out of the equation even when the evidence is there of the Creator God.

There really is no sensible reason for a religious person to deny the obvious truth of evolution except for the Atheist intrusion in that the Atheist evolution thereby promotes injustice and iniquity against any person or group of people who are deemed to be lower evolved.

What.
 
First of all it's NOT scientific fact by any means. Just a simple theory.

The naturalistic evolutionist believes that the universe began about 14 billion years ago. The earth is about 4.5 billion years old. Life began, probably as bacteria deep in rocks and has been evolving ever since. Purely natural forces without any input from any god or other deity have driven the evolutionary process. Some of these evolutionists do not believe in any type of god. -

See more at: What Is An Evolutionist

I don't think you know what a scientific theory is. PROTIP: It is not a synonym for "guess."
 
It is implied and it is understood in the teaching of evolution.

No, it's not. You're simply making stuff up. In no actual teachings of evolution is "white" somehow "more evolved."
 
Why do you believe that? Do you really think people in Africa stopped evolving after the migration event?

Evolution doesn't stop, there's no such thing as more highly evolved.
I did not say that I believe the racist claims even though I do know about them.

What I know for certain is that there is a Creator God who works in this world and evolution is a part of God working.

Actually the idea that Africans are inferior is a concept which had its summit when its believers started the US Civil War, and continued onward into today and beyond.

Your claim that there is no such thing as "more highly evolved" is utterly completely wrong, because if there is no higher evolved then there is no evolution.

====================================

Nope, still nonsense. Evolution has nothing to do with the Big Bang.
All you are really doing is sidetracking this thread into a nonsense debate - and I will not play along with that.

What Evolution does have a thing to do with is in prolonging the racist ideals of white superiority into the next generation and beyond.

=====================================

Well, frankly, many people just never really take the time to think about it, nor understand it. It's also not quite so simple as you make it out to be, but you make some valid points. It is a huge span of time, and many different adaptations which have occurred, as the migrations took place out of Africa. The racism that you are referring to isn't (imo) anything to do with evolution itself, but with cultural differences and merging diverse populations.
I love this comment and I applaud you for giving it.

Those who feel superior by the evolutionary message do not research it any farther, just as those who are made to feel inferior by it do not research it any further.

I also agree that the racism that I am referring to does not have anything to do with evolution itself because evolution is just being misused to feed the racist agenda as that racist superiority is wanted rather than the truth.
 
Your claim that there is no such thing as "more highly evolved" is utterly completely wrong, because if there is no higher evolved then there is no evolution.

Spoken like someone who doesn't know anything about evolutionary theory.

There is no such thing as "more highly evolved;" there is simply "better adapted to one's environment."
 
Everything and everyone is evolved to their present state. There is no hierarchy involved, that's a religious idea.
 
Last edited:
The political correctness of today makes so it can not be officially declared, but the racist superiority and racial inferiority is well understood without it being said.

As like the picture = Evolving.

And again your argument fails and is thus impeded by your lack of understanding right from the beginning.

The picture you referenced has nothing to do with evolution as it is actually understood. It is often cited by creationist and theist alike as a jumping point for their array of contentions, but it ultimately serves as only another folly of theirs.



March of Progress - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Scientists have noted that early human evolution did not progress in any linear, sequential fashion nor did it move along a "road" toward any predetermined "ideal form"; they have faulted the image with being misleading in implying these things. With regard to the picture's notoriety, Howell remarked that "The artist didn't intend to reduce the evolution of man to a linear sequence, but it was read that way by viewers.… The graphic overwhelmed the text. It was so powerful and emotional"


 
Actually, if God is behind evolution then He is a racist, for favoring the fairer races over the darkies. :cool:
That is what I am referring to, and even though I resent such words - there they are.

Just take out the word "God" as the Atheist do and there is the racist ideal.
 
What Evolution does have a thing to do with is in prolonging the racist ideals of white superiority into the next generation and beyond.

Prove it, otherwise it will remain merely your opinion.
 
That is what I am referring to, and even though I resent such words - there they are.

Just take out the word "God" as the Atheist do and there is the racist ideal.

If I were a member of the KKK I might agree with you, but you don't seem to know that not all whites are racist bigots.
 
First of all it's NOT scientific fact by any means. Just a simple theory.

The naturalistic evolutionist believes that the universe began about 14 billion years ago. The earth is about 4.5 billion years old. Life began, probably as bacteria deep in rocks and has been evolving ever since. Purely natural forces without any input from any god or other deity have driven the evolutionary process. Some of these evolutionists do not believe in any type of god. -

See more at: What Is An Evolutionist

It is a fact. Unless somehow you can prove the creationist point by recreating a supernatural miracle in a controlled lab condition.

crea.jpg

creationism-1-300x231.jpg
 
Your claim that there is no such thing as "more highly evolved" is utterly completely wrong, because if there is no higher evolved then there is no evolution.

The "goal" of evolution is reproduction, the continuation of the species in a shifting environment. If you want the most successful species, it's nematodes, yet I doubt you'd class them as highly evolved.
 
Just take out the word "God" as the Atheist do and there is the racist ideal.

You keep insisting this, but you have yet to demonstrate how it actually works. First, you're assuming the premise that white people are superior. Most everyone else in this thread is disputing that premise. Then you're assuming the premise that this superiority is somehow morally less objectionable if it came about through a god and not by natural processes. That premise doesn't even make sense. Then you take these premises to somehow conclude that atheism is racist. Atheism isn't anything. It's just not believing in gods. But more to the point, most atheists (at least in industrialized nations) embrace a humanist view, which loudly rejects racism. So, there's a lot of evidence and explanation that you need to produce for your bizarre assertion.
 
Everything and everyone is evolved to their present state. There is no hierarchy involved, that's a religious idea.
The idea of hierarchy is a human idea, which is one reason why Atheism is considered as another religion.

If we have a secular government here in the USA then our hierarchy here is human and not religious.

People always jump to hierarchies in everything, and that is why they jumped to superiority and inferiority in the Evolution and many people got it wrong using evolution to feed into the racist ideals.
 
'Religious evolution'? Those words do not go together. Which religion, for a start?
 
The idea of hierarchy is a human idea, which is one reason why Atheism is considered as another religion.

By whom? Do you know the literal meaning of the word 'atheist'?
 
Someday, the theory of evolution and the theory of gravity will be disproven <disproven isn't a word?> and you'll all be sorry.
 
Someday, the theory of evolution and the theory of gravity will be disproven <disproven isn't a word?> and you'll all be sorry.

And on that day we will all float off into space.
 
If I were a member of the KKK I might agree with you, but you don't seem to know that not all whites are racist bigots.
There are ways of proving that all of us whites (including myself) do indeed get white privileges - which privileges the non whites do not get.

All whites are not racist bigots, but all whites do receives (to different degrees) the racist superiority privileges.

Teaching and believing the Atheist version of evolution just feeds into that racist reality as a justification for it.
 
There are ways of proving that all of us whites (including myself) do indeed get white privileges - which privileges the non whites do not get.

All whites are not racist bigots, but all whites do receives (to different degrees) the racist superiority privileges.

Teaching and believing the Atheist version of evolution just feeds into that racist reality as a justification for it.

No. No proof, yet again. Just your opinion. In my town we have had a lot of immigration during the past three years. Many of them are African and not a few have recieved social housing from the local council, ahead of local caucasians who were higher up on the waiting list. It doesn't seemed to have caused any bad feeling, in fact some Africans have formed a band and are plying in the park next week. The world is a much nicer place than you think.
 
Last edited:
You keep insisting this, but you have yet to demonstrate how it actually works. First, you're assuming the premise that white people are superior. Most everyone else in this thread is disputing that premise. Then you're assuming the premise that this superiority is somehow morally less objectionable if it came about through a god and not by natural processes. That premise doesn't even make sense. Then you take these premises to somehow conclude that atheism is racist. Atheism isn't anything. It's just not believing in gods. But more to the point, most atheists (at least in industrialized nations) embrace a humanist view, which loudly rejects racism. So, there's a lot of evidence and explanation that you need to produce for your bizarre assertion.
You clearly misunderstood this entire thread.

Nothing you say here is consistent with the words in this thread.

As such there is no way for me to reply to your projected imagination here.

Just FYI.
 
Speaking of social constructs.

The OP is conflating the new liberal buzzword of "priviledge" and its meaning to being "more evolved". If whites are indeed privileged, its not a result of evolution. "Atheist evolution" does not result in privilege. Its a social construct - like gravity.
 
You clearly misunderstood this entire thread.

Nothing you say here is consistent with the words in this thread.

As such there is no way for me to reply to your projected imagination here.

Just FYI.

You must have read a different post. He spook sooth.
 
Back
Top Bottom