Re: The Onion:Evangelical Scientists Refute Gravity With New 'Intelligent Falling' Th
A person might view the subject in such hopeless terms when they read garbage like the "Onion" because otherwise there are very sensible and realistic views which align both science and religion together as one.
As in = "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind." ~ Albert Einstein
Einstein believed religion was Silly and would Laugh at your posts about Jesus-whoever and your bizarro Pick-and-choose-NT.
He specifically castigated a personal god.
JP Cusick said:
As like the "Big Bang" is scientific proof of a real creation day, just as "evolution" is just another way of saying that God (a Creator) is still in that process of creating / of evolving.
And as soon s you can show anything like god being involved in evolution..
DO let us know.
Cause right now you post VOODOO Crap.
JP Cusick said:
The "onion" claim about denying gravity is not a real story or report as it is just a lie.
It's a PARODY of 'Intelligent Design' which has No more credibility than 'intelligent falling'.
You Yourself legitimized the OP and it's 'Push' rather than pull concept.. and ergo it's at least One-UP on ID.
Anyone altering the OP Title is at least ill advised and Probably acting with Conflict of Interest because:
1. It's nearly Unprecedented.
2. Most likely it was a conflict of Interest and done it for a co-religionist.
3. Religion and Philosophy USED to be one section.
They were split because the religious did not want to be criticized when making claims or discussing Logically Baseless doctrine.
4. So they split off religion into a 'no criticize the overall concept zone'.
Ergo there should be especially WIDE latitude in the Philosophy section for ridicule as everyone understands IT'S where the rubber meets the road. Pretty much Everything goes.
5. When I see an OP Title, ie, "Obama Sucks", Or "Obamacare has Zero takers", I think to myself, "this is gonna a be a great link, mebbe FOX/WND/Townhall."
I do NOT have a right to See it on the title line.
Virtually NO strings get altered for that reason.
JP CUsick said:
To understand evolution is simply not enough.
Not enough for what?
It's only designed, like other subjects, to Teach that subject, not Family planning, Buddhism, or the best way to live your life, etc.
JP CuSick said:
The schools teach evolution as a false kind of scientific religion where people are degraded into animals and beast of burden.
Every person really needs to de-program the brainwashing that we all received.
What?
Deluded God FREAKS only take issue with one science.. that's because it contradicts their Indoctrinated MYTH.
All other sciences, including ones of overlapping proof, are not contested by the JERKS who know nothing about ANY science except told that this one contradicts their Creationist Myth.
People are NOT "degraded into animals and beast of burden".
They are taught that life/animals share a common ancestry, which is 100% True.
Religionists like to say Evolution or atheism are other religions because they see it in a battle with their BaseLess beliefs.
But its just another Valid science that people like YOU see as a threat to their BaseLess god.
JP Cusick said:
Many if not most people simply believe what they are told and then call that as thinking which it is not.
We all get told stuff and we all got taught stuff, so we each need to think everything through and make our own decisions based on our own sincere perception of the truth.
Nonsense again.
You believe in the NT, at least sections, such a Gen 1:1.
The resemblance of that particular passage to the Big Bang
is coincidence, as the next Dozen Clunker passages will verify.
This is like believing in
Vague Prophecies which can inevitably be connected to some event over the next few thousand years.
You think you can pick and choose from from this dart board of mostly false information As If anything it says that is true is something more than Pure Chance.
We see other Beauties come here and do the Same with the Koran/Allah.
No doubt I could do it with ANY Holy Book such as the Bhagavad Gita or any other legend/Myth religion, even though Most Contradict each other in Basic ways.
JP Cusick said:
It must not depend on whoever says what, or who is more knowledgeable because the final judgement must be our own.
To think has to mean using self generated thought, and as such we must never simply believe what we are told.
And the ONLY way you 'know' about Jesus and his 'divinity' IS what you are told. Period.
If you grew up on a Desert Island you would be capable of discerning certain truths from nature (as Darwin did in the Galapagos).
But you, like other VOODOOists before you, would have to Fabricate your own god/s as Thousands of civilizations/CULTures have done.
Most gods now gone/made obsolescent by the truth.
JP Cusick said:
I agree that the childish kind of creationism of a literal 6 days and 6,000 years is foolish, but the Bible is far more pertinent then are those who claim to represent the Bible.
Believing in Jesus of Immaculate conception, his resurrection, and his divinity is nearly as (perhaps more) Foolish.
JP Cusick said:
YES - at least all of the important stuff - yes, go out and verify everything.
I do believe that is what is meant by maturity.
Verify god.
Please tell us all WHICH/WITCH one you're going to attempt to do it, as Most people believe in a different one than you, and most people are Necessarily wrong, even if one scripture coincidentally got One thing write.
More on your Preposterous positions to follow, including Possible Aliens as Adam-and-Eve etc And "Chariots across the Sky" as the ships that brought them.
Oh my.
If there's One piece of magic/fantasy, there's always more to fill the need.
JP Cusick also WHIFFED on my post #23 in which he was quoted/Busted.
