• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

More Strong Evidence for Evolution: Anatomical Vestiges

No it does not mention how they traveled before they were cursed, BUT it does show that they did not crawl before.

But not enough evidence here for you to admit there is a connection?

science admits yes snakes did not always crawl and the bible states the snake was cursed to crawl on their belly.

Again, no it does not. Ancestors of snakes are not snakes.
 
No it did not. All the sentence says is that they will be cursed to crawl forever, not that they didn't crawl before. It's basic grammar.

Also, your understanding of evolution is just plain laughable. Educate yourself on a topic before you wish to discuss it, please.

Evolution is a theory and a joke. I am not going to study something that they even admit is a theory.

yea yea how is cursing something a curse if nothings changes? makes no sense .
 
Evolution is a theory and a joke. I am not going to study something that they even admit is a theory.

yea yea how is cursing something a curse if nothings changes? makes no sense .

I don't think you understand what a scientific theory is.

A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that is acquired through the scientific method, and repeatedly confirmed through observation and experimentation.[1][2] As with most (if not all) forms of scientific knowledge, scientific theories are inductive in nature and aim for predictive power and explanatory force. [3][4]

Scientific theory - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Gravity, technically, is a theory. So is plate tectonics.
 
Should i trust people that think we came from apes?

Humans didn't come from apes. Humans and apes share a common ancestor. You really don't know anything about evolutionary theory, do you?
 
Humans didn't come from apes. Humans and apes share a common ancestor. You really don't know anything about evolutionary theory, do you?

Must be they changed what they teach huh? back when i was in the indoctrination centers known as schools they taught the theory of evolution and that humans came from apes.

have they changed it already? how can they change something they claim to be fact? Oh wait reminds me of global warming, climate change bleh bleh bleh.

Human Evolution in 12 Pictures | Bored Panda

2109925-human-evolution.jpg

They no longer teach this above picture?
 
Must be they changed what they teach huh? back when i was in the indoctrination centers known as schools they taught the theory of evolution and that humans came from apes.

have they changed it already? how can they change something they claim to be fact? Oh wait reminds me of global warming, climate change bleh bleh bleh.

Human Evolution in 12 Pictures | Bored Panda

View attachment 67167093

They no longer teach this above picture?

They never taught me the above picture, or that humans came from apes. Maybe you just went to a terrible school, I dunno.
 
Should i trust people that think we came from apes?

That's the great thing about science, you don't have to trust people, or anything. All you have to do is look at the evidence and you can see the truth for yourself. Though, this only works if you are willing.
 
Should i trust people that think we came from apes?

No, but it doesn't matter. That means nothing changes from you because no one who accepts evolution and understands it thinks that and only dumb creationist use that line but don't think it either. Therefore you've excluded no one.
 
Hmmmmmmm so they have changed it already? LMAO How can they change something they claim to be fact?

Pictures of Human Evolution & Timeline of Prehistoric, Early & Modern Man

*Sigh*

Those are pictures of the stages of human evolution. A more accurate picture of primate evolution would be something like this:

primate_family_tree.gif


I dont believe evolution theory.

And one reason for that is that you clearly don't know anything about it.
 
*Sigh*

Those are pictures of the stages of human evolution. A more accurate picture of primate evolution would be something like this:

primate_family_tree.gif




And one reason for that is that you clearly don't know anything about it.


Oh look its the "new" evolutionary tree hmmmm what was wrong with the old one?
 
Oh look its the "new" evolutionary tree hmmmm what was wrong with the old one?

The "old" one showed the path of human evolution, which gives people who don't comprehend evolution the idea that apes turn into humans, which isn't how evolution works at all. The "new" one shows the evolution of various types of primates from common ancestors. This is not particularly difficult to understand.

Here's one for reptiles, since you're so hung up on snakes:

The-Reptile-Family-Tree.jpg
 
So the LORD God said to the serpent, "Because you have done this, "Cursed are you above all livestock and all wild animals! You will crawl on your belly and you will eat dust all the days of your life.
Genesis 3:14

It happened in the garden of eden.

So a lizard tempted Eve?
 
So a lizard tempted Eve?

The desire to decide right and wrong for oneself tempted Eve. Same as Lucifer. The whole deal is about establishing God's sovereignty.
 
Would love to see staunch evolutionists apply the theory to flyers. So far no one can satisfactorily answer my question of how birds evolved. There are skeletal vestiges of intermediate species that have some feathers, but so what? How does that translate from being on the ground to being an aerial species, when evolution takes millions of years? There is no practical reason for that random mutation. It's not like generations of creatures spent their days jumping off cliffs until one day one of them grew some feathers and a million years later we have birds

Flying animals glided first. Flying is an improvement on gliding.

Dogs alone prove the MECHANISM of evolution exists.
 
No the serpent did but it according to science had legs at the time. Then God cursed the SNAKE and things changed.

NO. NO IT DID NOT. Serpents *never* had legs. Serpents' ancestors did.

Snakes' ancestors are not snakes.
 
Would love to see staunch evolutionists apply the theory to flyers. So far no one can satisfactorily answer my question of how birds evolved. There are skeletal vestiges of intermediate species that have some feathers, but so what? How does that translate from being on the ground to being an aerial species, when evolution takes millions of years? There is no practical reason for that random mutation. It's not like generations of creatures spent their days jumping off cliffs until one day one of them grew some feathers and a million years later we have birds

The "skeletal vestiges" show you EXACTLY how birds evolved -- from species of avian dinosaurs. The split between flying and non-flying animals came long before birds, as we know them, existed.

"How does that translate from being on the ground to being an aerial species, when evolution takes millions of years?"

The overall development DID take millions of years. That's the difference between macroevolution and microevolution.
 
Overcomeproblems.com - Theory of Evolution Disproved

Piltdown Man- The “Piltdown “ skull was first “ discovered” in England in1912 by Charles Dawson. For Forty –one years it was leading evidence for evolution until in 1953 it was discovered to be a forgery . It was actually found to be a recent human skull combined with a female orangutan jaw, and was dyed and slightly modified to give it the appearance of age. It’s interesting to note how all textbooks before 1953 showed Piltdown man in every human’s family tree, then one day it was no longer “true”. The British Museum has documented other discoveries by Dawson as forgeries as well.

Piltdown Man - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Piltdown Man was a paleoanthropological hoax in which bone fragments were presented as the fossilised remains of a previously unknown early human. These fragments consisted of parts of a skull and jawbone, said to have been collected in 1912 from a gravel pit at Piltdown, East Sussex, England. The Latin name Eoanthropus dawsoni ("Dawson's dawn-man", after the collector Charles Dawson) was given to the specimen. The significance of the specimen remained the subject of controversy until it was exposed in 1953 as a forgery, consisting of the lower jawbone of an orangutan deliberately combined with the cranium of a fully developed modern human.
 
Back
Top Bottom