• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Noahs Ark.[W:109, W:140]

tecoyah

Illusionary
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 30, 2005
Messages
10,453
Reaction score
3,844
Location
Louisville, KY
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Conservative
With all the current hype concerning the new Hollywood adaptation of Gods novel (screenplay by some scribe with broken sandals), I thought it an interesting time to discuss the logistics involved in this story....please add as needed:

Material required:
For an estimated =/- 400, 000 animals of various sizes we can place the craft size to be roughly 4 miles long by 1 mile wide minimum. The required lumber to build such a thing might be approaching 1-200,000 mature trees. The timeframe to cut down and mill these materials (considering 7 able bodied people), would likely run into decades before manufacturing could begin.

Supplies needed:
To feed said animals for 40 days one would likely require a craft of similar size to the initial Ark as a storage facility for foodstuffs. We also run into the logistical nightmare of picking proper foods for individual animal diets and distributing appropriately. Obviously once fed the animals would digest this food and eliminate the waste product, which would also need to be removed at some point.
 
I think it's safe to assume the fauna and flora were what existed within the area of where the Ark was built.
 
I think it's safe to assume the fauna and flora were what existed within the area of where the Ark was built.

So the whole "2 of every animal" thingy and the "Worldwide" flood need to be revised?

Cool, I'll get the writers right on it.
 
I think it's safe to assume the fauna and flora were what existed within the area of where the Ark was built.

A safer assumption is that it is a fable that may have been based on a small nugget of truth before the fantastic elements were included to turn it into a moral lesson
 
So the whole "2 of every animal" thingy and the "Worldwide" flood need to be revised?

Cool, I'll get the writers right on it.

Who's to say there weren't several Arks? Hmmm?

You have to remember during that time, reality of the world was fairly localized. There were people who thought they might fall off the edge if they ventured too far.
 
What about other religions? God spoke to many. IMO

True....but this movie is based on the Christian Bible version, I mean come on....the original Sumerian one would have been pretty lame and no special effects would even need to come into play.

A huge boat full of every animal beats a guy an a raft with some goats hands down.
 
With all the current hype concerning the new Hollywood adaptation of Gods novel (screenplay by some scribe with broken sandals), I thought it an interesting time to discuss the logistics involved in this story....please add as needed:

Material required:
For an estimated =/- 400, 000 animals of various sizes we can place the craft size to be roughly 4 miles long by 1 mile wide minimum. The required lumber to build such a thing might be approaching 1-200,000 mature trees. The timeframe to cut down and mill these materials (considering 7 able bodied people), would likely run into decades before manufacturing could begin.

Supplies needed:
To feed said animals for 40 days one would likely require a craft of similar size to the initial Ark as a storage facility for foodstuffs. We also run into the logistical nightmare of picking proper foods for individual animal diets and distributing appropriately. Obviously once fed the animals would digest this food and eliminate the waste product, which would also need to be removed at some point.

your incorrect in something here, it rained for 40 days and nights, Noah and his family were in the ark longer then those 40 days, also the animals did not require feeding every day, because if i am correct the animals were in a hibernation mode during most of the time aboard the ark.

Noah with his sons labored, for a very long time building the ark more then the modern life time.
 
True....but this movie is based on the Christian Bible version, I mean come on....the original Sumerian one would have been pretty lame and no special effects would even need to come into play.

A huge boat full of every animal beats a guy an a raft with some goats hands down.

i have not seen the movie, however i am told it does not follow biblical scripture.
 
I've always been amused at how it could be explained that 8.7 million species piled onto this arc, and supposedly it happened within a day. Nevermind the species in remote parts of the world undiscovered at the time, or the fact that this would mean thousands of animals per second. Or the climate meaning some animals would not be able to survive. Or the needed food. Or the fact that Noah came from a people that had no tradition in ship building. Or that this whole story is a retelling of a Sumerian story. Et cetera ad infinitum.

I respect those who say it is a parable or allegory. At least that's a dependable position.
 
yes, it would be impossible for it to take place, if GOD was not part of the story.

however God is part, and with GOD anything is possible.

Except its not a literal story, there's no evidence or reason to suggest that it ever happened and it would be impossible for it to occur as described in the Bible.
 
how can you say that?

there is a link in this thread, in which a small text was recently deciphered a 4,000-year-old clay tablet from ancient Mesopotamia

British Museum: Prototype for Noah's Ark was round | Nation & World | The Seattle Times

A recently deciphered 4,000-year-old clay tablet from ancient Mesopotamia -- modern-day Iraq -- reveals striking new details about the roots of the Old Testament tale of Noah. It tells a similar story, complete with detailed instructions for building a giant round vessel known as a coracle -- as well as the key instruction that animals should enter "two by two."

Its a SIMILAR STORY, not the same story, and just because someone wrote down a story 4,000 years ago doesn't make it true. You know people can thought of the idea of fictional storytelling by then correct?

Just because someone wrote something down, even 4000 years ago, doesn't automatically make it true.

AND this source specifically tells the reader to forget the Biblical verison of the ark, so how is this evidence of it?
 
Last edited:
Its a SIMILAR STORY, not the same story, and just because someone wrote down a story 4,000 years ago doesn't make it true. You know people can thought of the idea of fictional storytelling by then correct?

Just because someone wrote something down, even 4000 years ago, doesn't automatically make it true.

the ark and the flood are not exclusive to the bible.

there are several stories of the ark /flood, from different cultures....they all make the suggestion.

so i am am not teling you its is true, i am telling you, the story has been around ,which predates most of the bible itself.
 
the ark and the flood are not exclusive to the bible.

there are several stories of the ark /flood, from different cultures....they all make the suggestion.

so i am am not teling you its is true, i am telling you, the story has been around ,which predates most of the bible itself.

And its all fictional dude, it didn't actually happen. There's no evidence of a global flood ever happening and there's no way one dude,his family, and two of each animal can repopulate the entire Earth, you also couldn't fit so many animals on a single boat of that size anyway, AND what the **** would all the meat eating animals eat? Other animals?

Its fiction, its not meant to be taken literally
 
And its all fictional dude, it didn't actually happen. There's no evidence of a global flood ever happening and there's no way one dude,his family, and two of each animal can repopulate the entire Earth, you also couldn't fit so many animals on a single boat of that size anyway, AND what the **** would all the meat eating animals eat? Other animals?

Its fiction, its not meant to be taken literally

how do you know this?

you have not read the bible because you proposing questions that are already answered in the bible.
 
how do you know this?

you have not read the bible because you proposing questions that are already answered in the bible.

The Bible is not a source on whether the Bible is correct, thats circular logic.
 
The Bible is not a source on whether the Bible is correct, thats circular logic.


you were applying questions to the story, in a sense, asking how can that be.......well the bible answers your questions.

and you seem to be forgetting something here...

if you believe GOD does not exist...that's fine, the story is not true.

if you believe GOD exist, then you believe it true, and with GOD anything is possible.
 
you were applying questions to the story, in a sense, asking how can that be.......well the bible answers your questions.

and you seem to be forgetting something here...

if you believe GOD does not exist...that's fine, the story is not true.

if you believe GOD exist, then you believe it true, and with GOD anything is possible.

What? No dude, truth and reality is not dependant on your personal beliefs. Something either happened or it didn't happen, something either is possible or not possible. "Believing" in something doesn't let you change reality
 
What? No dude, truth and reality is not dependant on your personal beliefs. Something either happened or it didn't happen, something either is possible or not possible. "Believing" in something doesn't let you change reality

i believe the word .."faith" as escaped you.
 
Back
Top Bottom